Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

The Chaparral Lands Conservancy

The Chaparral Lands Conservancy (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $432,158 to it, the largest being WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC ($171,658). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$516k
Funders on record
7
Grants received
$432k
Net assets
$105k
3/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 50%
01What it does

What The Chaparral Lands Conservancy does

Mission

The mission of the Conservancy is to protect shrubland ecosystems through land preservation and stewardship.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Otay Mesa Vernal Pool II&III - Uplands Habitat Restoration Project - To plan, permit and implement restoration of approximately seventeen acres of rare vernal pool wetlands, maritime succulent scrub, and several dependent imperiled plant and animal species in the City of San Diego community of Otay Mesa.

    $271,248 spent
    59% of program spending
  2. Sky Oaks Project - This project is designed to acquire for permanent conservation the 640-acre Sky Oaks property in Chihuahua Valley in eastern San Diego County

    $12,640 spent
    3% of program spending
  3. Del Mar Mesa I: Design, plan, permit, and implement restoration of rare vernal pool wetlands, chaparral, coastal sage scrub,and several dependent imperiled plant and animal species in and near the Del Mar Preserve in the northern city of San Diego.

    $169,352 spent
    37% of program spending
  4. Other Projects: Los Coyotes Condors Project - to work with the Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla and Cupeno Indians to support endangered species conservation on and around the Los Coyotes Reservation in eastern San Diego County.

    $8,028 spent
    2% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $461,268.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($346k) Expenses 100 ($346k) Net assets 100 ($105k)2018 Revenue 124 ($429k) Expenses 124 ($429k) Net assets 100 ($105k)2019 Revenue 123 ($425k) Expenses 123 ($425k) Net assets 100 ($105k)2020 Revenue 200 ($690k) Expenses 200 ($690k) Net assets 100 ($105k)2021 Revenue 130 ($449k) Expenses 130 ($449k) Net assets 100 ($105k)2022 Revenue 132 ($456k) Expenses 132 ($456k) Net assets 100 ($105k)2023 Revenue 83 ($286k) Expenses 83 ($286k) Net assets 100 ($105k)2024 Revenue 168 ($582k) Expenses 168 ($582k) Net assets 100 ($105k)2025 Revenue 149 ($516k) Expenses 149 ($516k) Net assets 100 ($105k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (149)Expenses (149)Net assets (100)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $759k to $566k (−25%).

$512k
$588k
$561k
$653k
$690k
$759k
$566k
$594k
$762k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 98% · 2018 89% · 2019 80% · 2020 86% · 2021 70% · 2022 63% · 2023 62% · 2024 48% · 2025 56%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of The Chaparral Lands Conservancy’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,629 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$0
’17
$0
’18
$0
’19
$0
’20
$0
’21
$5
’22
$0
’23
$0
’24
$0
’25
2.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed333333333
Joined·+0+2+0+0+0+1+0+0
No longer listed·02000100
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2021 → 2023: the base narrowed from 5 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $187k → $15k.

2 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 15% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of The Chaparral Lands Conservancy’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

The Chaparral Lands Conservancy leans on a few funders — its largest provides 40% of grant income and the top three 71%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund The Chaparral Lands Conservancy.

40%
largest funder
71%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 32% · 2022 75% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

60% of The Chaparral Lands Conservancy's grant income comes from California funders.

CA
CO
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’21
’22
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $65k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

The Chaparral Lands Conservancy's revenue grew 49% between 2017 and 2025.

Operating margin0% · below the median
Months of reserve2.4mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)5% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,433 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Government funding The Chaparral Lands Conservancy receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $52k on record.

Federal$52k
grants $0contracts $52k
Top agencies
  • Department of Homeland Security$52k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like The Chaparral Lands Conservancy

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

89% of spending goes to programs.

Program 89%Management 7%Fundraising 3%

Governance

3
board members
67%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for The Chaparral Lands Conservancy: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds The Chaparral Lands Conservancy?
The Chaparral Lands Conservancy (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $432,158 to it, the largest being WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC ($171,658). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does The Chaparral Lands Conservancy have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $432,158 in grants to The Chaparral Lands Conservancy, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of The Chaparral Lands Conservancy?
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC is the largest funder on record, with $171,658 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like The Chaparral Lands Conservancy find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Chaparral Lands Conservancy →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 7 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing