Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA INC

ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA INC (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $201,944 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($46,051). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 68% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$155k
Funders on record
7
Grants received
$202k
Net assets
$91k
5/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 22%
01What it does

What Election Integrity Project California Inc does

Mission

To defend, through education, research, and advocacy, the civil rights of U.S citizens to fully participate in the election process under Federal and state law.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Programs

  1. RESEARCH1. EIPCas observation program was updated in preparation for the Nov. 4, 2025 Special Election regarding Prop. 50 redistricting. 2. EIPCa made our Citizen Observer Guideline available to assist all citizens interested in observing the Special election. - The Guidelines will help citizens gain a better understanding of their right to observe as well as the responsibility to ask questions while not interfering with the election process. - EIPCa trained our EIPCa Observers to observe the election process, address the issues as they occurred, document the issues and our efforts to address them. 3. EIPCa researched the VoteCal voter rolls for the November 4, 2025 Special Election. - EIPCa purchased and researched the statewide voter rolls at the start of the Nov. 4th election; at the close of the Nov. 4th election; and 90 days after the Nov. 4th election. - Our research revealed the same issues identified in the research of the 2022 certified election results in that the county voter roll data, election methods used, and the number of votes cast does not match the Secretary of State reports. - EIPCa will take action in 2026 to address the egregious disenfranchisement of…

    $21,150 spent
    18% of program spending
  2. EDUCATION1. EIPCa delivered presentations to various groups in person and electronically, including 11 education/fundraising tours in CA and DC this year. - EIPCa was invited by national nonprofit organization Eagle Forum to join them in Washington, DC to meet with legislators regarding issues of concern to citizens across the country. EIPCa focused on our work with election integrity issues. - EIPCa President spoke nine times at citizens group events about the issues in the election system in California identified by EIPCa. - EIPCa educated citizens about the research done by EIPCa identifying issues that have resulted in the loss of integrity in CA elections. - EIPCa took the opportunity to update people about the legal action we are involved with and to raise funds to cover the costs. - In our presentations we invite CA citizens, regardless of party affiliation, to sign up with EIPCa to be trained to observe the election process as an EIPCa volunteer.2. EIPCa sent out educational articles explaining what the state and county election procedures are for managing elections and processing ballots. We also sent out educational articles explaining how citizens can observe the…

    $37,643 spent
    31% of program spending
  3. ADVOCACY1. EIPCa continues to challenge Californias unconstitutional election laws by submitting a Proposal for comprehensive Federal Election Integrity Legislation. - EIPCa worked with Advocates for Faith and Freedom to provide a Proposal to Congress for Federal Election Integrity Legislation. - EIPCa included in the Proposal an appendix of 101 citations of 15 years of our research and evidence that Californias election laws and procedures have created an election system that is easily manipulated through entry-points of corruption. - EIPCa provided the Proposal to Chairman Steil of Committee on House Administration who included all but two of EIPCas 17 points in the Make Elections Great Again: How to Restore Trust and Integrity in Federal Elections (MEGA Act). - The MEGA Act continues to go through the Congress process of getting a bill passed and will continue in 2026 with the goal of being voted on in 2027.2. EIPCa sent a team to Washington DC to provide a Proposal Packet to 20 legislators from across the nation who indicated concern with the lack of integrity in the election system in California and other states.3. EIPCa retained Advocates for Faith and Freedom (AFF) to…

    $61,005 spentof which $45,000 as grants
    51% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $119,798.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($159k) Expenses 100 ($152k) Net assets 100 ($17k)2020 Revenue 289 ($461k) Expenses 243 ($370k) Net assets 643 ($108k)2021 Revenue 277 ($441k) Expenses 358 ($545k) Net assets 24 ($4k)2022 Revenue 122 ($195k) Expenses 93 ($142k) Net assets 337 ($57k)2023 Revenue 100 ($159k) Expenses 74 ($113k) Net assets 616 ($103k)2024 Revenue 113 ($180k) Expenses 133 ($202k) Net assets 473 ($79k)2025 Revenue 98 ($155k) Expenses 103 ($157k) Net assets 543 ($91k)
2019202020212022202320242025
Revenue (98)Expenses (103)Net assets (543)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $50k to $113k (+125%).

$50k
$113k
$59k
$67k
$103k
$79k
$92k
2019202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (57% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 24,946 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$7k
’19
$91k
’20
−$104k
’21
$53k
’22
$47k
’23
−$23k
’24
−$1k
’25
1.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Linda Paine

Chair/President

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

20202021
Listed65
Joined·+0
No longer listed·1
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base narrowed from 4 funders to 2 funders, grant income fell $44k → $6k.

5 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 68% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA INC has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 23% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

68% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA INC.

23%
largest funder
62%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 56% · 2021 56% · 2022 43% · 2023 98% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

68% of ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA INC's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $65k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside California, across 2 states.

WI
NV

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’20
’21
’22
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $137k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA INC receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $202k to it.

Operating margin−1% · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−0% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 16,849 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

88%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA INC?
ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA INC (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $201,944 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($46,051). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 68% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA INC have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $201,944 in grants to ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA INC, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA INC?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $46,051 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Election Integrity Project California →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2019–2025), and the filings of 7 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing