Skip to content

New York · Nonprofit

ECONOMIC MOBILITY CORPORATION

ECONOMIC MOBILITY CORPORATION (New York) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,296,883 to it, the largest being LAURA AND JOHN ARNOLD FOUNDATION ($2,223,883). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$681k
Funders on record
4
Grants received
$3.3M
Net assets
$3.2M
2/4 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Economic Mobility Corporation does

Mission

The Economic Mobility Corporation (mobility) identifies, develops and evaluates programs and policies that enable disadvantaged individuals to acquire the education, skills and networks needed to succeed in the labor market so that they can support themselves and their families.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. The organization conducts research on promising strategies and evaluates programs that have the potential to make a meaningful difference in people's lives by helping adults with low incomes to acquire the education, skills, and networks needed to succeed in the labor market. In 2025, the organization worked with leading practitioners to conduct rigorous evaluations that will provide highly credible evidence to the workforce development and postsecondary education fields on effective strategies for helping workers access well-paying careers. Projects included evaluations of the replication of per scholas' it support training in columbus and silver spring, the replication of asap at two west virginia community colleges, and valley initiative for development and advancement (vida), a sister organization to project quest that helps residents of the rio grande valley in texas prepare for well-paying careers in high-demand sectors of the local economy. Evaluation of the replication of per scholas: per scholas was founded in 1995 in new york city's south bronx with a mission to help low-income individuals access well-paying careers in the technology field. Per scholas' it support…

    $637,181 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $637,181.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($551k) Expenses 100 ($640k) Net assets 100 ($1.1M)2018 Revenue 136 ($750k) Expenses 116 ($744k) Net assets 101 ($1.1M)2019 Revenue 224 ($1.2M) Expenses 92 ($587k) Net assets 160 ($1.7M)2020 Revenue 459 ($2.5M) Expenses 97 ($618k) Net assets 338 ($3.6M)2021 Revenue 68 ($375k) Expenses 95 ($607k) Net assets 316 ($3.4M)2022 Revenue 73 ($403k) Expenses 83 ($531k) Net assets 304 ($3.3M)2023 Revenue 344 ($1.9M) Expenses 105 ($673k) Net assets 332 ($3.6M)2024 Revenue 259 ($1.4M) Expenses 130 ($834k) Net assets 387 ($4.2M)2025 Revenue 124 ($681k) Expenses 115 ($738k) Net assets 292 ($3.2M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (124)Expenses (115)Net assets (292)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $1.9M to $3.9M (+104%).

$1.2M
$1.2M
$1.9M
$3.9M
$3.7M
$3.4M
$3.7M
$4.3M
$3.4M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 11%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

93% of ECONOMIC MOBILITY CORPORATION’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (91% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 23,940 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$89k
’17
$6k
’18
$646k
’19
$1.9M
’20
−$231k
’21
−$128k
’22
$1.2M
’23
$593k
’24
−$57k
’25
19
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Cynthia Shoss

Chair of the board

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed777786666
Joined·+0+0+0+1+0+0+0+0
No longer listed·00002000
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $350k → $681k.

Funder
'18
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
$125k
funders
1
2
1
1
2
2
1

From the IRS filings of ECONOMIC MOBILITY CORPORATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ECONOMIC MOBILITY CORPORATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 67% of grant income and the top three 96%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

67%
largest funder
96%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2020 58% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 78% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

ECONOMIC MOBILITY CORPORATION draws 96% of its grant income from funders outside New York, across 4 states in all.

WI
MI
NY
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’18
’20
’21
’22
’23
New York out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

ECONOMIC MOBILITY CORPORATION holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 13,917 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−8% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve18.6mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)3% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,917 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like ECONOMIC MOBILITY CORPORATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New York

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

86% of spending goes to programs.

Program 86%Management 10%Fundraising 3%

Governance

5
board members
80%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

40%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

NY

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ECONOMIC MOBILITY CORPORATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ECONOMIC MOBILITY CORPORATION?
ECONOMIC MOBILITY CORPORATION (New York) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,296,883 to it, the largest being LAURA AND JOHN ARNOLD FOUNDATION ($2,223,883). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does ECONOMIC MOBILITY CORPORATION have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $3,296,883 in grants to ECONOMIC MOBILITY CORPORATION, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ECONOMIC MOBILITY CORPORATION?
LAURA AND JOHN ARNOLD FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $2,223,883 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ECONOMIC MOBILITY CORPORATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Economic Mobility →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing