Skip to content

Illinois · Nonprofit

DUPAGE FEDERATION ON HUMAN SERVICES REFORM

DUPAGE FEDERATION ON HUMAN SERVICES REFORM (Illinois) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $700,497 to it, the largest being ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS ($219,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.9M
Funders on record
8
Grants received
$700k
Net assets
$1.2M
5/8 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 14%
01What it does

What Dupage Federation on Human Services Reform does

Mission

To generate cross-sector solutions that leverage expertise to address the human services needs of the dupage region. We strive for a human services system that is robust, responsive, and effective, so that the well-being of our neighbors is optimal, and no one is disadvantaged.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Community planning - in fy25, community planning hosted four quarterly council of community leaders meetings, each with an average of 25 - 30 participants, to address urgent human service issues and strategies for equity. We participated in and co-hosted multiple sessions of the health equity & access response team, reaching over 100 participants with training and tools to strengthen local coalitions. In fy25, we participated in more than 25 community collaborations and provided public testimony or comment at the local, state, and federal levels, including issues of housing, health equity, and data quality. We led housing engagement through over 20 interviews, focus groups, and public meetings to document resident experiences and inform the county housing action plan. In may 2025, we hosted an immigrant integration forum with 225 registrants and 13 resource tables. In addition, we supported multiple community health needs assessments and strengthened the illinois welcoming centers network through site visits and technical support.

    $156,270 spent
    11% of program spending
  2. Language access resource center (larc) - in fy25, larc provided more than 10,000 hours of interpretation services, including 2,005 hours virtual, 7,230 hours in-person, and over 165,800 minutes telephonic. Translation services totaled more than 785,000 words across 260+ projects. Larc supported the community through 94 externs who provided free interpretation hours and we trained 93 students through multiple interpreter training sessions. In fy25, 86 individuals earned certificates of completion and 220 interpreters attended professional development workshops. We onboarded more than 20 new interpreters across 10+ languages.

    $1,154,654 spent
    78% of program spending
  3. Public benefits access (pba) - in fy25, pba delivered 12 live trainings reaching more than 1,000 participants on topics including medicaid redetermination, abe/ilogin, tanf, snap, public charge, and benefits for non-citizens. Over 150 learners enrolled in pba's five on-demand elearning modules. The program also hosted monthly q&a sessions with more than 115 total participants. Individual technical assistance was provided through private sessions and email consultations to support providers and consumers with complex cases, including non-citizen eligibility, medicaid coverage, and housing-related benefits. Pba participated in more than 35 community collaborations and advocacy meetings and provided resources such as updated desk aids, income limits, and online materials throughout the year.

    $161,879 spent
    11% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,472,803.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.9M) Expenses 100 ($1.9M) Net assets 100 ($1.1M)2018 Revenue 91 ($1.7M) Expenses 95 ($1.8M) Net assets 94 ($1.0M)2019 Revenue 78 ($1.5M) Expenses 83 ($1.5M) Net assets 86 ($923k)2020 Revenue 63 ($1.2M) Expenses 73 ($1.4M) Net assets 71 ($762k)2021 Revenue 68 ($1.3M) Expenses 65 ($1.2M) Net assets 79 ($840k)2022 Revenue 77 ($1.5M) Expenses 66 ($1.2M) Net assets 97 ($1.0M)2023 Revenue 85 ($1.6M) Expenses 85 ($1.6M) Net assets 97 ($1.0M)2024 Revenue 86 ($1.6M) Expenses 86 ($1.6M) Net assets 99 ($1.1M)2025 Revenue 99 ($1.9M) Expenses 94 ($1.8M) Net assets 109 ($1.2M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (99)Expenses (94)Net assets (109)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $1.2M to $1.1M (−9%).

$1.2M
$1.1M
$1.0M
$986k
$1.1M
$1.1M
$1.2M
$1.2M
$1.3M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 17% · 2018 17% · 2019 12% · 2020 14% · 2021 23% · 2022 24% · 2023 8% · 2024 11% · 2025 29%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

34% of DUPAGE FEDERATION ON HUMAN SERVICES REFORM’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (81% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 11,793 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$14k
’17
−$69k
’18
−$78k
’19
−$161k
’20
$74k
’21
$212k
’22
$2k
’23
$15k
’24
$106k
’25
2.9
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

David Roth

Exec. Dir

Board chair

Theresa Forthofer

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed311213121010121313
Joined·+0+1+1+1+0+4+4+2
No longer listed·190230232
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 4 funders, grant income rose $80k → $130k.

2 of 8 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 28% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $130k from 2 payers (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group). These are real filings, and they are not money DUPAGE FEDERATION ON HUMAN SERVICES REFORM raised.

From the IRS filings of DUPAGE FEDERATION ON HUMAN SERVICES REFORM’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

DUPAGE FEDERATION ON HUMAN SERVICES REFORM leans on a few funders — its largest provides 31% of grant income and the top three 78%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

63% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund DUPAGE FEDERATION ON HUMAN SERVICES REFORM.

31%
largest funder
78%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 36% · 2021 47% · 2022 50% · 2023 77% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

60% of DUPAGE FEDERATION ON HUMAN SERVICES REFORM's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 63% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

98% of DUPAGE FEDERATION ON HUMAN SERVICES REFORM's grant income comes from Illinois funders.

IL
NY
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’20
’21
’22
’23
Illinois out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $197k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

DUPAGE FEDERATION ON HUMAN SERVICES REFORM runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 6,891 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin6% · above the median
Months of reserve2.9mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−0% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,891 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like DUPAGE FEDERATION ON HUMAN SERVICES REFORM

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Illinois

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

84% of spending goes to programs.

Program 84%Management 14%Fundraising 2%

Governance

12
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

88%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

IL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for DUPAGE FEDERATION ON HUMAN SERVICES REFORM: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds DUPAGE FEDERATION ON HUMAN SERVICES REFORM?
DUPAGE FEDERATION ON HUMAN SERVICES REFORM (Illinois) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $700,497 to it, the largest being ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS ($219,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does DUPAGE FEDERATION ON HUMAN SERVICES REFORM have?
IRS filings report 8 organizations giving $700,497 in grants to DUPAGE FEDERATION ON HUMAN SERVICES REFORM, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of DUPAGE FEDERATION ON HUMAN SERVICES REFORM?
ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS is the largest funder on record, with $219,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like DUPAGE FEDERATION ON HUMAN SERVICES REFORM find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Illinois. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Dupage Federation on Human Services Reform →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 8 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing