Loading…
Loading…
Maryland · Nonprofit
Counselors in the Community (Maryland) is funded by 2 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $40,000 in grants to it, the largest being NATIONAL RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION ($25,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
Counselors in the Community runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 9,629 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,629 health nonprofits under $100k, FY2023
Grant income rose $15k → $25k on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
From the IRS filings of Counselors in the Community’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
Counselors in the Community leans on a few funders — its largest provides 63% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2023 100% · 2024 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
Counselors in the Community draws 63% of its grant income from funders outside Maryland — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 2 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $10k on record.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2023–2023), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing