How much did HOPE HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INCORPORATED grant in FY2024?

HOPE HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INCORPORATED reported 15 grants totaling $2,768,782 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is HOPE HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INCORPORATED based?

HOPE HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INCORPORATED is based in WI.

HOPE HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INCORPORATED

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

HOPE HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INCORPORATED

It is the mission of hope house "to end homelessness & create healthy communities," to this end hope house provides: temporary housing for families, rapid re-housing for families, permanent housing for homeless families, a low-cost medical clinic, emergency food pantry, and youth and adult education programs.

$2.8M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$67k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 40% of HOPE HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INCORPORATED’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

—

2021

—

2022

eviction preventionprevention behavioral

2023

eviction preventionprevention behavioral

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$66,666

Median grant

States reached

$8.6M

Total assets

Largest grants

COMMUNITY ADVOCATES INC$66,667
BENEDICT CENTER$66,667
HMONG AMERICAN FRIENDSHIP ASSOCIATION INC$66,667
MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF WISCONSIN INC$66,667
SAMAD'S HOUSE CORP$66,667
CHANGING HANDS MENTORING INC$66,667
CITY OF CUDAHY$66,667
OUTREACH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC$66,666
VIVENT HEALTH INC$66,666
SAFE AND SOUND INC$66,666
SERENITY INNS INC$66,666
MILWAUKEE TURNERS INC$50,000
INPOWER SOLUTIONS LLC$50,000
MANNA BEHAVIORAL SERVICES$50,000
GREAT LAKES DRY HOOTCH INC$50,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $247k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.8M · 11 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.8M

$938k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%

+31%

Still filing today

82%

45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $417k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthCrime & LegalHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

HEALTH CONNECTIONS INC
2× · 2020–2022 · $253k · revenue +578% · 28% of their budget
CA
COMMUNITY ADVOCATES INC
2× · 2022–2024 · $227k · revenue +29%
MH
MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF WISCONSIN INC
3× · 2020–2024 · $224k · revenue +107%

Funded once

NC
NEU-LIFE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INCgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $180k · revenue +39%
RUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC
one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -8%
MR
MERA RESPONSE TEAM
one grant, 2022 · $100k · 100% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Milwaukee Women's Center Inc

The milwaukee women's center, inc., a wisconsin not-for-profit corporation, provides innovative, culturally competent holistic care that will empower men, women, and children to live safe, independent, and healthy lives.

Human Services

Family Service Madison Inc

Provide human services to instill hope and promote wellness in our community.

—

The Mindful Group Inc

The Mindful Group Inc. is a Milwaukee-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit dedicated to empowering underserved communities through workforce training, job placement, and holistic support services. Our mission is to provide access to education,…

Community Improvement

Racine Kenosha Community Action Agency

Partnering in a thriving community and stabilizing lives by providing supportive programs and access to community resources for individuals and families.

Human Services

United Neighborhood Centers of Milwaukee

United Neighborhood Centers of Milwaukee's mission is to strengthen city neighborhoods by combining and enhancing the assets of our partner agencies to improve the quality of life for urban families.

Human Services

Milwaukee Community Service Corps Inc

The milwaukee community service corps (mcsc) is a non-profit vocational training organization providing employment, education and life skills to training youth adults and unemployed and underemployed of milwaukee, wisconsin.

Employment

Southwest Chicago Homeless Services

To provide food, clothing, case management and placement in housing, as well as referrals for additional supportive services. a commitment to helping homeless and housing-insecure persons and strive to end homelessness in our communities…

Human Services

Magdalene House Chicago Inc

Magdalene House Chicago, Inc. (MHC) is a home and enterprise for positive, personal change for women survivors of sex trafficking, prostitution, and addiction in the Chicagoland area. For women survivors, MHC promises the flexibility,…

—

The Center for Community Transitions

CCT strengthens our community by helping people with criminal records find a healthier and more productive way of living. Our work provides employment and transition services: supports alternatives to incarceration: and restores and…

—

Community Health Network Inc

Community health network, inc. ("chnw") is a 501(c)(3) corporation serving the health related needs of the citizens of the indianapolis metropolitan area and central indiana. chnw operates three general acute care hospitals and provides…

Health

Mha Speakout Speakup

We focus on making the maximum positive effort for our community. Our members and volunteers provide the momentum that helps us affect change. Using a range of human, social, cultural, religious and artistic services, these services are…

—

Urban Health and Wellness Inc

Provide free healthcare, education and support to those who are uninsured in metro atlanta.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health America of Wisconsin Inc and the most unlike its peers is Outreach Community Health Centers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 22. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2/38

the rest of the field

10%

602/5,750

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

26 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

24/26

Grantees still filing

20/26

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,307,315Health$995,133Arts & Culture$248,000Human Services$246,666Youth Development$148,053Crime & Legal$141,666International$46,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI38.6× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Milwaukee Bucks Foundation Inc · Brewers Community Foundation Inc · Rite-Hite Foundation Inc · Charles D Jacobus Family Foundation · Direct Supply Foundation Inc · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation HOPE HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INCORPORATED funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MANNA BEHAVIORAL SERVICES.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 10.6× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 274411819 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MANNA BEHAVIORAL SERVICES, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 94% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Hope House of Milwaukee Incorporated?

Find your warmest path to Hope House of Milwaukee Incorporated through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

HOPE HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INCORPORATED

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

26 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Hope House of Milwaukee Incorporated?

More from the funding graph

HOPE HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INCORPORATED

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

26 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Hope House of Milwaukee Incorporated?

More from the funding graph