· Private foundation
Sherlock Charitable Foundation
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k1 grant · $260
- $50k–250k2 grants · $114k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE SHERLOCK FAMILY FOUNDATION | $56,865 |
| THE SHERLOCK CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $56,865 |
| Individual grant recipient | $260 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2022, 35 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $114k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCALVARY FUND INC5× · 2017–2021 · $50k · revenue +14%
- WAWE ARE BLOOD3× · 2019–2021 · $32k · revenue +36%
- MLMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC4× · 2017–2021 · $13k · revenue +320%
Funded once
- ILI LIVE HERE I GIVE HEREone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -51%
Central Texas Food Bank Incone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -28%- WSWESTON SWIMMING INCone grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue +17%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.
Driven by the belief that access to healthy food is a basic right for all people, feeding westchester leads hunger action programs and mobilizes the resources needed to eradicate hunger in westchester county.
The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…
The foundation facilitates equitable access to healthcare services for the greater waterbury community. our founding principles are to provide for the healthcare needs (including medical equipment and expenses) of the 13-town greater…
Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.
Support westchester county health care corporation (wchcc) by being responsive to the needs and objectives of the hospital and related facilities and programs operated by wchcc and the health and welfare of the communities served by such…
To provide funds to benefit families affected by cancer and to support cancer research and education.
To inspire and mobilize people in the united states to support the mission of the u.n. world food programme to end hunger.
Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.
The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.
To pursue anti-hunger initiatives through the west side campaign against hunger (wscah) program whose mission is to alleviate hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access with dignity to a choice of healthy food and supportive…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sherlock Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 32% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE SHERLOCK CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHERLOCK FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CALVARY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds WE ARE BLOOD ↗
- Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
- Who funds I LIVE HERE I GIVE HERE ↗
- Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds PERSON TO PERSON INC ↗
- Who funds BUILDERS BEYOND BORDERS ↗
- Who funds ALS ANGELS INC ↗
- Who funds WESTON SWIMMING INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD RESCUE US INC ↗
- Who funds ASPETUCK LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds Mankind Project ↗
- Who funds WESTON WARM-UP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds LAND OF MY GRANDFATHERS INC ↗
- Who funds JUSTICE VENTURES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds WESTPORT POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FILLING IN THE BLANKS INC ↗
- Who funds Texas Mamma Jamma Ride Inc ↗
- Who funds ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CARITAS OF PORT CHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds THE MARFAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sherlock Family Foundation · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Shack Sackler Foundation · Newman's Own Foundation · Fernwood Foundation · Mutual of America Foundation · Joseph a Patrick Foundation Inc · Synchrony Foundation · Kurtz Family Foundation Trust · The Tiger Tail Family Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Mbia Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sherlock Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Family and Children's Aid Inc — 36% of income from government
- Mid-Fairfield Child Guidance Center Inc — 30% of income from government
- Aspetuck Land Trust — 28% of income from government
- Domestic Violence Crisis Center — 10% of income from government
- Person to Person Inc — 5% of income from government
- Sacred Heart University Incorporated — 1% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Sherlock Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Sherlock Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.