Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Colorado · Nonprofit

ACADEMY OF URBAN LEARNING

ACADEMY OF URBAN LEARNING (Colorado) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $846,945 to it, the largest being Caring for Denver Foundation ($574,684). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$3.6M
Revenue FY2025
8
Funders on record
$847k
Grants received
$1.3M
Net assets
5/8 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 7%

Against its field

ACADEMY OF URBAN LEARNING is better cushioned than half of the 922 youth development nonprofits its size.

Operating margin0% · below the median
Months of reserve6.4mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)10% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 922 youth development nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20212021 Revenue 100 ($2.5M) Expenses 100 ($2.0M) Net assets 100 ($304k)2022 Revenue 114 ($2.8M) Expenses 110 ($2.2M) Net assets 300 ($913k)2023 Revenue 132 ($3.3M) Expenses 155 ($3.1M) Net assets 344 ($1.0M)2024 Revenue 145 ($3.6M) Expenses 166 ($3.3M) Net assets 417 ($1.3M)2025 Revenue 147 ($3.6M) Expenses 180 ($3.6M) Net assets 422 ($1.3M)
20212022202320242025
Revenue (147)Expenses (180)Net assets (422)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 12% · 2022 15% · 2023 13% · 2024 17% · 2025 12%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

18% of ACADEMY OF URBAN LEARNING’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (82% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,026 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.

$452k
21
$608k
22
$134k
23
$224k
24
$14k
25
6.4
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 4 funders, grant income rose $10k → $120k.

2 of 8 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)5% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ACADEMY OF URBAN LEARNING’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 7 of 8 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ACADEMY OF URBAN LEARNING leans on a few funders — its largest provides 68% of grant income and the top three 85%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

85% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ACADEMY OF URBAN LEARNING.

68%
largest funder
85%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 77% · 2020 100% · 2022 69% · 2023 49%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

95% of ACADEMY OF URBAN LEARNING's grant income comes from Colorado funders.

CA
CO

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
22
23
Colorado out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $41k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 8 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like ACADEMY OF URBAN LEARNING

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Colorado

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

56% of spending goes to programs.

Program 56%Management 44%Fundraising 0%

Governance

6
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ACADEMY OF URBAN LEARNING: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ACADEMY OF URBAN LEARNING?
ACADEMY OF URBAN LEARNING (Colorado) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $846,945 to it, the largest being Caring for Denver Foundation ($574,684). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does ACADEMY OF URBAN LEARNING have?
IRS filings report 8 organizations giving $846,945 in grants to ACADEMY OF URBAN LEARNING, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ACADEMY OF URBAN LEARNING?
Caring for Denver Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $574,684 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ACADEMY OF URBAN LEARNING find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Colorado. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2021–2025), and the filings of 8funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing