Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Zinn Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Recreation & Sports$103kReligion$92kEducation$12kInternational$10kPhilanthropy$10kFood & Nutrition$7kYouth Development$5kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $23k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$600
Median grant
6
States reached
$259k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FLORA YOUTH BASEBALL$52,000
BRINGHURST COMMUNITY CHURCH$9,500
CARROLL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
CARROLL COUNTY FOOD PANTRY$2,000
REBELLION YOUTH INC$1,000
CARROLL COUNTY COMMUNITY CENTER$1,000
KOKOMO RESCUE MISSION$800
CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S FUND$600
FLORA FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH$600
FLORA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT$500
Individual grant recipient$500
BRINGHURST COMMUNITY CHURCH$400
AMERICAN RED CROSS$300
CARROLL COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$300
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $300 → 14%SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CENTER: $650 → 16%KOKOMO RESCUE MISSION: $200 → 15%KOKOMO RESCUE MISSION: $100 → 15%KOKOMO RESCUE MISSION: $100 → 15%HELPING HAND: $250 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
MI
IN
CO
VA
NC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$246k · 33 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
18

Total granted

$246k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+119%

Still filing today

33%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionInternationalPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $6k · revenue +134%
  • CC
    Carroll County Food Pantry Inc
    4× · 2018–2025 · $3k · revenue +73%
  • LA
    LOVE AT WORK INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $2k · revenue +310% · 55% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $17k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • SC
    Shepherd Community Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $650 · revenue +119%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Services Love Inc of Greater Lansing

Christian Services serves as a resource center and clearinghouse matching resources of over 200 Lansing, MI area churches to needs from local indigent people. Coordination of Thanksgiving food baskets, clothes closets, and transitional…

Human Services
2
Christian Care

Provide meals, clothing, counseling, referrals, spiritual guidance and shelter to anyone in need without charge

Housing & Shelter
3
Grace Resource Center Inc

To provide food, shelter, clothing, medical assistance and other immediate need to the thousands of needy and homeless people living in our area.

Housing & Shelter
4
Christian Community Response Team

Catholic Community Response Team provides direct support and referral services to those in crisis needing emergency assistance to meet their basic needs. We do it in a manner inspired by the Gospel of Jesus. Our focus is to keep families…

Human Services
5
Christian Care Center Inc

Transformed lives leading to stronger families and real life in Christ

Human Services
6
Faithbytheword Incorporated

As Christs followers, we have the Holy Spirit residing within us, which means we have His power to fulfill this command. We cant save anyone, but its our responsibility to tell people about the God who can. How will they believe unless…

Human Services
7
Community for Christ Outreach

Religious Orginazation

Housing & Shelter
8
Kiowa Creek Community Church Nonprofit Corporation

Religious organization. Church and foodbank. Our church is a small church established in 1907. We have a foodbank serving Elbert County residents that has been in operation for over 30 years.

Religion
9
Gods Love Inc
10
Love Inc (in the Name of Christ) of Charlottesville and Albemarle

We mobilize local churches to transform lives and communities in the name of christ by lovingly serving people in need in their communities.

11
Mooresville Area Christian Mission Inc

The Christian Mission provides food, clothing, shelter, substance use support, and life skills to bring individuals from crisis to stability.

Human Services
12
House of Refuge Faith Based
Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kokomo Rescue Mission Inc and the most unlike its peers is Love At Work Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%24%10–20yr14%10%20–35yr13%43%35–55yr23%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%85%10–20yr14%1%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr23%4%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
10%
4,324/41,972

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FLORA YOUTH BASEBALL — $102,000 · OtherFLORA YOUTH BASEBALLBRINGHURST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $44,250 · OtherBRINGHURST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHBRINGHURST COMMUNITY CHURCH — $30,815 · OtherBRINGHURST COMMUNITY CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $16,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCARROLL COUNTY COMM CENTER — $8,920 · Other+41 more — $55,679 · Other+41 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $6,160 · ReligionBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP — $1,500 · ReligionCHRISTIAN CHILDRENS FUND — $3,149 · InternationalKOKOMO RESCUE MISSION INC — $1,200 · Human ServicesShepherd Community Inc — $650 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $300 · Human ServicesThe Helping Hand Inc — $250 · Human ServicesLOVE AT WORK INC — $1,710 · PhilanthropyFLORA COMMUNITY CLUB INC — $1,090 · Community ImprovementCARROLL COUNTY COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$258,264Religion$7,660International$3,149Human Services$2,400Philanthropy$1,710Community Improvement$1,090Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $6,160 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN CHILDRENS FUND — $3,149 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetCarroll County Food Pantry Inc — $3,018 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetLOVE AT WORK INC — $1,710 over 3y, 55% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP — $1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKOKOMO RESCUE MISSION INC — $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPURDUE CHRISTIAN CAMPUS HOUSE INC — $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIRIO RESOURCES INC — $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLORA COMMUNITY CLUB INC — $1,090 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLUCILLE RAINES RESIDENCE INC — $700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetShepherd Community Inc — $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc — $400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Helping Hand Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION INC — $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN CHILDRENS FUND
  • Who funds Carroll County Food Pantry Inc
  • Who funds LOVE AT WORK INC
  • Who funds BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP
  • Who funds KOKOMO RESCUE MISSION INC
  • Who funds PURDUE CHRISTIAN CAMPUS HOUSE INC
  • Who funds LIRIO RESOURCES INC
  • Who funds FLORA COMMUNITY CLUB INC
  • Who funds CARROLL COUNTY COMMUNITY CENTER INC
  • Who funds LUCILLE RAINES RESIDENCE INC
  • Who funds Shepherd Community Inc
  • Who funds Little Traverse Conservancy Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Zinn Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Zinn Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Zinn Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph