Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ziiz Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Community Improvement$8.5MHealth$345kReligion$330kInternational$260kRecreation & Sports$154kArts & Culture$101kEducation$92kFood & Nutrition$50k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $82
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.7M
$1,690,372
Median grant
1
States reached
$46M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEGACY HERITAGE PROGRAMMING IV LLC - LEGACY HERITAGE ONBOARD PROGRAM$1,690,372
LEGACY HERITAGE INVESTORS I LLC$82
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HEBREW AT THE CENTER INC: $50k → 8%CITY OF HOPE: $70k → 14%CAMP ZEKE: $91k → 17%YAD ELIEZER: $250k → 20%GIFT OF LIFE BONE MARROW FOUNDATION: $23k → 11%SVARA: $98k → 14%CAMP RAMAH IN THE BERKSHIRES: $63k → 7%IKAR: $50k → 14%RELIGIOUS ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENT OF US: $85k → 17%CHICAGO THEATRE GROUP: $50k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $50k → 7%RELIGIOUS ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENT OF US: $84k → 17%ONE FAMILY FUND: $10k → 7%LEGACY HERITAGE PROGRAMMING IV LLC - LEGACY HERITAGE ONBOARD PROGRAM: $2.3M → 17%LEGACY HERITAGE PROGRAMMING IV LLC - LEGACY HERITAGE ONBOARD PROGRAM: $2.0M → 17%LEGACY HERITAGE PROGRAMMING IV LLC - LEGACY HERITAGE ONBOARD PROGRAM: $1.9M → 17%LEGACY HERITAGE PROGRAMMING IV LLC - LEGACY HERITAGE ONBOARD PROGRAM: $1.7M → 17%LEGACY HERITAGE PROGRAMMING IV LLC - LEGACY HERITAGE ONBOARD PROGRAM: $545k → 17%UNITED JEWISH APPEAL: $50k → 17%LEGACY HERITAGE INVESTORS I LLC: $903 → 17%LEGACY HERITAGE INVESTORS I LLC: $82 → 17%LEGACY HERITAGE INVESTORS I LLC: $8 → 17%LEGACY HERITAGE INVESTORS I LLC: $2 → 17%LEGACY HERITAGE INVESTORS I LLC: $1 → 17%PRIZMA CENTER FOR JEWISH DAY SCHOOLS: $5k → 17%DRISHA INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH EDUCATION INC: $32k → 17%DRISHA INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH EDUCATION INC: $5k → 17%ORTHODOX JEWISH CONGREGATIONS OF AMERICA: $14k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.9M · 5 repeat orgs$873k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +72% since the first grant, against +48% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
14

Total granted

$8.9M
$873k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+48%

Still filing today

40%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationReligionYouth DevelopmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    LEGACY HERITAGE PROGRAMMING IV LLC - LEGACY HERITAGE ONBOARD PROGRAM
    5× · 2020–2024 · $8.5M
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF WGH WESTERN GALILEE HOSPITAL NAHARIYA C/O THE LAPIN GROUP
    2× · 2021–2022 · $252k · revenue -39%
  • RZ
    RELIGIOUS ZIONIST YOUTH MOVEMENT OF US
    2× · 2021–2022 · $168k

Funded once

  • YE
    YAD ELIEZER
    one grant, 2021 · $250k
  • S
    SVARAgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $98k · revenue +28%
  • CW
    CZ WELLNESS GROUP INC
    one grant, 2021 · $91k · revenue +7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
2
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
3
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
4
Hitmasrut Inc

Jewish educational programs

Religion
5
American Friends of Torah and Tefilah Ramat Eshkol Inc

To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.

Religion
6
Sherit Isroel
7
The Shalem Foundation

To promote and foster the creation of a zionist intellectual infrastructure for the state of israel, the development of a jewish national culture, and the establishment and promotion of intellectual and economic liberty.

Crime & Legal
8
Behold Israel

To provide accurate reporting on israel and current events based on god's written word and most importantly lead people to the saving knowledge of jesus christ.

Religion
9
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

10
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
11
Camp Ramah in the Poconos

Camp ramah's mission is to create a nurturing, safe, fun-filled, vibrant jewish community that inspires the education, social, cultural, moral, physical, and emotional growth of campers and staff, fostering life-long jewish identity. ramah…

Recreation & Sports
12
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Prizmah Center for Jewish Day Schools Inc and the most unlike its peers is One Family Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LEGACY HERITAGE PROGRAMMING IV LLC - LEGACY HERITAGE ONBOARD PROGRAM — $8,464,445 · OtherLEGACY HERITAGE PROGRAMMING IV LLC - LEGACY HERITAGE ONBOARD PROGRAM+9 more — $702,589 · Other+9 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF WGH WESTERN GALILEE HOSPITAL NAHARIYA C/O THE LAPIN GROUP — $252,000 · InternationalONE FAMILY FUND — $10,000 · InternationalSVARA — $97,500 · ReligionCZ WELLNESS GROUP INC — $91,346 · Youth DevelopmentHEBREW AT THE CENTER INC — $50,000 · EducationPRIZMAH CENTER FOR JEWISH DAY SCHOOLS INC — $5,000 · EducationCHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC — $50,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC — $50,000 · PhilanthropyGIFT OF LIFE MARROW REGISTRY INC — $22,500 · Health
Other$9,167,034International$262,000Religion$97,500Youth Development$91,346Education$55,000Arts & Culture$50,000Philanthropy$50,000Health$22,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF WGH WESTERN GALILEE HOSPITAL NAHARIYA C/O THE LAPIN GROUP — $252,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetSVARA — $97,500 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetCZ WELLNESS GROUP INC — $91,346 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN THE BERKSHIRES INC — $62,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHEBREW AT THE CENTER INC — $50,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetDRISHA INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH EDUCATION INC — $36,901 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetGIFT OF LIFE MARROW REGISTRY INC — $22,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONE FAMILY FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPRIZMAH CENTER FOR JEWISH DAY SCHOOLS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY13.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Covenant Foundation · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · The Harold Grinspoon Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ziiz Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ziiz Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Ziiz Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph