Skip to content

· Private foundation

Zichron Foundation for Special Need

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$106k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$535kYouth Development$106kInternational$31kPhilanthropy$27kHuman Services$6kEducation$5kRecreation & Sports$3kCivil Rights$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $78k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$902k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$19,500
EZRAT ISRAEL$15,318
CHABAD OF LAKEVIEW$12,285
CONG AGUDATH ISRAEL OF BORO PARK$10,800
LUBAVITCH EDUCATIONAL CENTER$10,180
THE ALEPH INSTITUTE$10,000
CHABAD OF CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL$5,400
MDY DAF YOMI$5,000
JEWISH LEARNING CENTER$4,690
PROJECT MOSHIACH AWARENESS INC$4,350
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CTR$1,800
Individual grant recipient$1,800
HAKSHIVA INC$1,800
CHABAD OF KEY WEST INC$1,800
BIKE4CHAI$1,440
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HAKSHIVA INC: $2k → 17%HAKSHIVA INC: $1k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $9k → 11%HAKSHIVA INC: $2k → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $9k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$607k · 17 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
18

Total granted

$607k
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+87%
+145%

Still filing today

29%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +123%
  • CO
    CHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +168%
  • Best Buddies International Inc
    2× · 2020–2022 · $7k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • CJ
    CHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF DORAL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $33k
  • HF
    HEBRON FUND INC
    one grant, 2023 · $27k · revenue +10%
  • LT
    LOMDEI TORAH
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Neveh Zion

To voluntarily assist the house of religious learning known as yeshiva neveh zion in israel

Religion
2
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
3
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
4
Friends of Yeshiva Beer Abraham

Furtherance of jewish education

Religion
5
Friends of Ha'am Ha'yehudi Inc F/K/a American Friends of Haam Hayehuda

Support of ha'am ha'yehudi b'tel aviv

Philanthropy
6
Chassidus in English Inc

Translation of classic chassidic texts and the teachings of the Lubavitcher Rebbes,and the composition of works designed to make Judaism and Chassidism relevant to readers today.

Religion
7
American Friends of Yeshiva High School of Kiryat Arba Inc

Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide educational and social improvement for the children of kiryat arba, israel.

Philanthropy
8
Eimek Hatorah Inc

The origanization supports educational institutions. It also runs an educational institution with a campus in Israel.

International
9
Teach for Israel Inc

- To educate Jews and Christians as to the biblical significance of the Land of Israel through live lectures and over the internet. Teach for Israel seeks to nurture appreciation for the modern state of Israel and its history and to…

International
10
Hadar Hatorah Rabbinical College and Subsidary Machon Chana

Religious education

Education
11
American Friends of Yeshiva Imrei Emes I

Award grants for jewish education

Religion
12
American Friends of Habad of Geneva Inc

To provide support and activities related to educational and religious programs for habad of geneva (affiliated with world-wide chabad (alternate spelling) lubavitch jewish movement.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Yad Eliezer; the most unlike its peers is Hebron Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH LEARNING CENTER INC: $133,984 · OtherJEWISH LEARNING CENTER INCTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $106,290 · OtherTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLEEZRAT ISRAEL INC: $75,158 · OtherEZRAT ISRAEL INCCONG AGUDATH ISRAEL OF BORO PARK: $49,200 · OtherCONG AGUDATH ISRAEL OF BORO PARKCHABAD OF LAKEVIEW INC: $35,085 · OtherCHABAD OF LAKEVIEW INCCHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF DORAL INC: $33,000 · OtherCHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF DORAL INCCHABAD AT THE CIVIC CENTER: $24,400 · OtherCOLEL CHABAD: $21,430 · Other+23 more: $51,705 · Other+23 moreCHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL INC: $59,680 · ReligionCHABAD ON…+1 more: $1,800 · ReligionTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $60,000 · Crime & LegalTHE ALEPH…HEBRON FUND INC: $27,000 · PhilanthropyPROJECT MOSHIACH AWARENESS: $4,350 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $18,360 · Human ServicesHAKSHIVA INC: $4,300 · Human ServicesBest Buddies International Inc: $7,062 · InternationalCentral Fund of Israel: $4,080 · InternationalJewish Culture High School Inc: $5,000 · Education
Other$530,252Religion$61,480Crime & Legal$60,000Philanthropy$31,350Human Services$22,660International$11,142Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $60,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL INC: $59,680 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHEBRON FUND INC: $27,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $18,360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $7,062 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Culture High School Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetPROJECT MOSHIACH AWARENESS: $4,350 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHAKSHIVA INC: $4,300 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Friends of Chabad of Thailand Inc: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF NEVE COLLEGE FOR WOMEN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HEBRON FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER ↗
  • Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Culture High School Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT MOSHIACH AWARENESS ↗
  • Who funds HAKSHIVA INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Chabad of Thailand Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF NEVE COLLEGE FOR WOMEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY20.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Sragowicz Foundation Inc · The Ejnra Foundation · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Zichron Foundation for Special Need funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Zichron Foundation for Special Need. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
  • The Aleph Institute Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Zichron Foundation for Special Need’s filings →

More from the funding graph