Skip to content

· Private foundation

Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$580k
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$231k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

93% of Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Paypal Charitable Giving Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $580k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’17
6
’18
12
’19
0
’20
5
’21
4
’22
5
’23
2
’24
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$2.2MPhilanthropy$483kEducation$73kFood & Nutrition$10kArts & Culture$4k
02FY2023 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k3 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $551k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEGED SHOMAYIM$231,000
KEREN TIFERETH YISROEL FOUNDATION$171,030
KOLLEL ZICHRON YESHAYA$148,500
CONGREGATION MEOR HATEFILLAH$25,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
YESHIVA GEDOLA OF PATTERSON$1,600
YESHIVAS RADIN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 64% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MEGED SHOMAYIM: $280k → 14%MOSDOS RABBAINU NACHUM MESHADYK: $500 → 20%PAYPAL GIVING FUND: $247k → 14%YESHIVAH EMEK HATORAH: $5k → 6%KOLLEL ZICHRON YESHAYA: $176k → 11%YESHIVA GEDOLA OF PATTERSON: $2k → 12%MEGED SHOMAYIM: $233k → 14%KEREN CHAIM: $1k → 20%PAYPAL GIVING FUND: $236k → 14%KEREN TIFERETH YISROEL FOUNDATION: $171k → 11%MEGED SHOMAYIM: $231k → 14%KOLLEL ZICHRON YESHAYA: $149k → 11%MEGED SHOMAYIM: $228k → 14%KOLLEL ZICHRON YESHAYA: $109k → 11%MEGED SHOMAYIM: $128k → 14%DARKAI SHMUEL INC: $55k → 11%MEGED SHOMAYIM: $105k → 14%KOLLEL ZICHRON YESHAYA: $54k → 11%MEGED SHOMAYIM: $500 → 14%BAIS MEDRASH NACHLAS YAAKOV: $50k → 11%BAIS MEDRASH GEVOHA OF AMERICA: $25k → 11%CONGREGATION MEOR HATEFILLAH: $25k → 11%BAIS MEDRASH GEVOHA OF AMERICA: $25k → 11%CONG ZICHRON PINCHOS: $18k → 11%CONG TIFERES YAKOV: $10k → 11%KOLLEL ZICHRON YESHAYA: $10k → 11%BAYOM HASHISHI - KEREN ZICHRON YAEL: $10k → 11%YESHIVAS RADIN: $10k → 11%LAKEWOOD CHEDER: $6k → 11%YESHIVA GEDOLAH TIFERES TZVI: $5k → 11%KOLLEL ZICHRON YESHAYA: $5k → 11%YESHIVAS BRISK: $5k → 11%YESHIVAS BRISK: $5k → 11%BAIS TOVA: $5k → 11%YESHIVA GEDOLAH TIFERES TZVI: $5k → 11%KUPAS YOM TOV INC: $5k → 11%KUPAS YOM TOV INC: $4k → 11%CONGREGATION ZICHRON PINCHOS: $4k → 11%KEREN TIFERETH YISROEL FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%BAIS HALEVI: $3k → 11%YESHIVAS RADIN: $3k → 11%CONGREGATION OHEL YITZCHOK: $3k → 11%CONGREGATION BMG BROMBERG: $2k → 11%TOMCHEI SHABBOS OF LAKEWOOD: $1k → 11%YESHIVAS RADIN: $1k → 11%YESHIVA NEFESH HACHAIM: $1k → 11%YESHIVA EITZ CHAIM: $1k → 11%KEREN TIFERETH YISROEL FOUNDATION: $975 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 14 repeat orgs$250k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +351% since the first grant, against +49% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2023, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
89

Total granted

$2.0M
$212k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+351%
+49%

Still filing today

21%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionFood & NutritionPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MEGED SHOMAYIM
    7× · 2018–2025 · $1.2M · revenue -75%
  • KZ
    KOLLEL ZICHRON YESHAYA
    6× · 2018–2024 · $502k
  • KT
    KEREN TIFERETH YISROEL FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $176k · revenue +489% · 96% of their budget

Funded once

  • DS
    DARKEI SHMUEL INC
    one grant, 2021 · $55k · revenue -18% · 55% of their budget
  • BM
    BAIS MEDRASH NACHLAS YAAKOV
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • EP
    ELIYOHU PINCUS
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
2
Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
3
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
4
Yeshivat Or Hachaim of Lakewood Inc

Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.

Education
5
Yeshiva Toras Chaim Inc

The organization operates a religious/parochial high school and college in lakewood, nj.

Unclassified
6
Mesivta Keren Orah

To conduct and maintain a religious school in accordance with the tenets, traditions and precepts of the orthodox jewish faith.

Education
7
Yeshiva Bais Mordechai of Teaneck

To provide religious Jewish education.

Education
8
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
9
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
10
Meiras Bais Yaakov Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for high school girls.

Education
11
Yeshivas Toras Zev Inc

The purpose of this organization is to support indigent torah scholars and their families by providing stipends and additional funds at jewish holiday times.

Religion
12
Meoros Bais Yaakov Inc

Operation of a parochial grade school in lakewood, new jersey.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tomchei Shabbos D'lakewood Inc; the most unlike its peers is Keren Tifereth Yisroel Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEGED SHOMAYIM: $1,205,080 · EducationMEGED SHOMAYIM+3 more: $11,000 · EducationKOLLEL ZICHRON YESHAYA: $501,500 · OtherKOLLEL ZICHRON YESHAYABAIS MEDRASH NACHLAS YAAKOV: $50,000 · OtherBAIS MEDRASH NACHLAS YAAKOVBAIS MEDRASH GEVOHA OF AMERICA: $50,000 · OtherBAIS MEDRASH GEVOHA OF AMERICA+94 more: $188,515 · Other+94 morePAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $482,935 · PhilanthropyPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FU…KEREN TIFERETH YISROEL FOUNDATION INC: $175,655 · PhilanthropyKEREN TIFERETH YISROEL FOUN…DARKEI SHMUEL INC: $55,000 · ReligionKUPAS YOM TOV INC: $8,500 · Religion+1 more: $500 · ReligionTOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TORAH BTZFAT INC: $250 · International
Education$1,216,080Other$790,015Philanthropy$658,590Religion$64,000Food & Nutrition$1,000International$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEGED SHOMAYIM: $1,205,080 over 7y, 11% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $482,935 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN TIFERETH YISROEL FOUNDATION INC: $175,655 over 4y, 96% of budgetDARKEI SHMUEL INC: $55,000 over 1y, 55% of budgetKUPAS YOM TOV INC: $8,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS TOVA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONG OROS BAIS YAAKOV OF LAKEWOOD: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMosdos Rabbainu Nachum Meshadyk: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TORAH BTZFAT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEGED SHOMAYIM ↗
  • Who funds PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND ↗
  • Who funds KEREN TIFERETH YISROEL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DARKEI SHMUEL INC ↗
  • Who funds KUPAS YOM TOV INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds BAIS TOVA INC ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY27.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · Jdh Foundation · The Sorala Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Keren Tifereth Yisroel Foundation Inc · Goldner Family Charity Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Bais Tova Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 108 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Zichron Chaim Avraham’s filings →

More from the funding graph