Skip to content

New Jersey · Private foundation

Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$580k
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
7
Organizations funded FY2023
43%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

93% of Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Paypal Charitable Giving Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $580k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’17
6
’18
12
’19
0
’20
5
’21
4
’22
5
’23
2
’24
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2023
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2023
$231,000
Organizations funded a year
3 to 62
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
2
Total assets, FY2023
$1.3M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 43% of the organizations Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 5% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationReligionPhilanthropyFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20237$580k43%
FY20227$473k29%
FY20215$402k40%
FY20203$6100%
FY201924$301k71%
FY201819$241k100%
FY201762$62kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$2.2MPhilanthropy$483kEducation$73kFood & Nutrition$10kArts & Culture$4k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Meged Shomayim$1,205,080711%
Kollel Zichron Yeshaya$501,5006n/a
Keren Tifereth Yisroel Foundation Inc$175,655496%
Darkei Shmuel Inc$55,000155%
Congregation Meor Hatefillah$25,0001n/a
Yeshivath Radin$14,0003n/a
Yeshiva Gedolah Tiferes Tzvi Inc$10,0002n/a
Kupas Yom Tov Inc$8,50020%
Lakewood Cheder School Inc$5,50010%
Bais Tova Inc$5,00010%
Show all 17 grantees
All grantees of Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Meged Shomayim$1,205,080711%
Kollel Zichron Yeshaya$501,5006n/a
Keren Tifereth Yisroel Foundation Inc$175,655496%
Darkei Shmuel Inc$55,000155%
Congregation Meor Hatefillah$25,0001n/a
Yeshivath Radin$14,0003n/a
Yeshiva Gedolah Tiferes Tzvi Inc$10,0002n/a
Kupas Yom Tov Inc$8,50020%
Lakewood Cheder School Inc$5,50010%
Bais Tova Inc$5,00010%
Yeshivas Emek Hatorah Inc$5,0001n/a
Yeshiva Eitz Chaim Inc$1,5002n/a
Tomchei Shabbos D'Lakewood Inc$1,00010%
Cong Oros Bais Yaakov of Lakewood$50010%
Mosdos Rabbainu Nachum Meshadyk$50010%
Yeshiva Toras Menachem$5001n/a
American Friends of Torah Btzfat Inc$25010%

Plus 90 recipients with no EIN on record ($233k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 2 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 10 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMeged Shomayim: $1,205,080 over 7y, 11% of budgetKeren Tifereth Yisroel Foundation Inc: $175,655 over 4y, 96% of budgetDarkei Shmuel Inc: $55,000 over 1y, 55% of budgetKupas Yom Tov Inc: $8,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLakewood Cheder School Inc: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBais Tova Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTomchei Shabbos D'Lakewood Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCong Oros Bais Yaakov of Lakewood: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMosdos Rabbainu Nachum Meshadyk: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Torah Btzfat Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 10.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY27.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · Jdh Foundation · The Sorala Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Keren Tifereth Yisroel Foundation Inc · Goldner Family Charity Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation with peer funders

About Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation

How much does Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation give?
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation reported 7 grants totaling $580,130 in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 62 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (79%), Philanthropy (18%), Education (3%).
Who are Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Meged Shomayim ($1.2M), Kollel Zichron Yeshaya ($502k), Keren Tifereth Yisroel Foundation Inc ($176k).
Does Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 43% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Ojc Fund, Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation, Donors Fund Inc.
Where is Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation based?
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation is based in NJ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 108 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Zichron Chaim Avraham’s filings →

More from the funding graph