Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Zembrodt Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$745k
Granted FY2025still arriving
44
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$310k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Religion$2.6MHealth$593kHuman Services$489kEducation$400kArts & Culture$59kFood & Nutrition$35kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kYouth Development$29kOther$0
02FY2025 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $101k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $284k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $310k
$7,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST CATHERINE MISSION FUND$310,000
THE POINT ARC OF NKY$50,000
ST AGNES CHURCH$30,500
COVINGTON CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$30,000
MADONNA HOUSE OF NO KY INC$25,000
ST BARBARA CHURCH$20,000
NOTRE DAME ACADEMY$20,000
DIOCESAN CATHOLIC CHILDRENS HOME$18,000
CARE NET PREGNANCY SVC N KY$15,000
ONE QUEST HEALTHCHILDREN'S HOME OF NKY$15,000
THE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION$10,000
HAIG POINT FOUNDATION$10,000
NEWPORT CENTRAL CATHOLIC HS$10,000
BLESSED SACRAMENT SCHOOL$10,000
CONGREGATION OF DIVINE PROVIDENCE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $5k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $5k → 8%Family Research Council: $5k → 14%Family Research Council: $5k → 14%Family Research Council: $5k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
KY
VA
SC
DC
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.2M · 58 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against -5% for the ones you funded once.

58 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

58
3

Total granted

$4.2M
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
-5%

Still filing today

28%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalArts & CultureHuman ServicesReligionCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NP
    NEW PERCEPTIONS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +21%
  • DC
    DIOCESAN CATHOLIC CHILDREN'S HOME INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $54k · revenue +6%
  • SE
    St Elizabeth Medical Center Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $40k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • SA
    ST ANTHONY CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -5%
  • BH
    Bethany House Svc Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Calvary Hospital Inc

The mission of calvary hospital is to care for the medical, emotional and spiritual needs of our adult patients with advanced cancer and other life-limiting illnesses. it is the only fully accredited acute care hospital in the u.s. devoted…

Health
2
Mercy Medical Center Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities

3
Nursing Sisters Home Care Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
4
Methodist Health Inc

Methodist health provides quality healthcare services with a compassionate and caring spirit to persons, families and communities of the tri-state. at methodist health, our values are based on our commitment to quality. we define quality…

Health
5
Catholic Health Care System

The catholic health care system ("chcs or the "system") is a health care delivery system composed of hospitals, nursing homes, managed care plans and other entities that deliver and provide for the delivery of health care services (the…

6
St Charles Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

7
Life St Mary

We, trinity health pace and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.life st. mary is a member of trinity health pace and trinity health.

Health
8
St Charles Hospital Corp

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
9
Good Shepherd Hospice Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

10
Archcare Community Services Inc

The organization's mission is to provide a community resource for information regarding available social and health care services; to provide community and pastoral services, as well as transitional and supportive housing, for the frail…

11
Good Shepherd Hospice

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

12
Apostolic Christian Lifepoints Inc

Provide facilities and care for the developmentally disabled

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Haig Point Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChild and Family ServicesCancer Support OrganizationsFaith-Based Senior LivingPregnancy Support ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Developmental Disabilities …Community Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 60 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr18%9%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr14%23%35–55yr18%50%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr18%5%10–20yr16%9%20–35yr14%17%35–55yr18%64%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
12%
2,432/20,293

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST CATHERINE MISSION FUND — $930,000 · OtherST CATHERINE MISSION FUNDSt Catherine Church Missions — $930,000 · OtherSt Catherine Church MissionsThe Point ARC of NKY — $260,000 · OtherThe Point ARC of NKYSt Agnes Church — $196,500 · OtherMadonna House of No KY — $150,000 · OtherSt Barbara Church — $140,000 · Other+46 more — $1,344,500 · Other+46 moreSt Elizabeth Medical Center Inc — $40,000 · HealthRedwood School & Rehabilitation Inc — $35,000 · HealthST CHARLES CARE CENTER INC — $30,000 · HealthTHE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · HealthCARMEL MANOR INC — $15,000 · HealthThe Karen Wellington Memorial Foundation — $15,000 · Health+1 more — $5,000 · HealthFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $35,000 · InternationalMUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES INC — $30,000 · InternationalHUMAN LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC — $15,000 · InternationalAMERICAN VALUES — $30,000 · Arts & CultureFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL — $30,000 · Human ServicesHAIG POINT FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · PhilanthropyETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC — $18,000 · ReligionASSURANCE FOR LIFE INC — $15,000 · Civil Rights
Other$3,951,000Health$160,000International$80,000Arts & Culture$30,000Human Services$30,000Philanthropy$30,000Religion$18,000Civil Rights$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEW PERCEPTIONS INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetDIOCESAN CATHOLIC CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $54,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSt Elizabeth Medical Center Inc — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRedwood School & Rehabilitation Inc — $35,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN VALUES — $30,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST CHARLES CARE CENTER INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHAIG POINT FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC — $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCARMEL MANOR INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC — $15,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Karen Wellington Memorial Foundation — $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetASSURANCE FOR LIFE INC — $15,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW PERCEPTIONS INC
  • Who funds DIOCESAN CATHOLIC CHILDREN'S HOME INC
  • Who funds St Elizabeth Medical Center Inc
  • Who funds Redwood School & Rehabilitation Inc
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC
  • Who funds MUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN VALUES
  • Who funds FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL
  • Who funds ST CHARLES CARE CENTER INC
  • Who funds HAIG POINT FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC
  • Who funds THE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC
  • Who funds CARMEL MANOR INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Johnson Charitable Gift FundOH23.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · The Butler Foundation · George and Mary Jo Budig Family Foundati Foundation C/O George J Budig · St Elizabeth Medical Center Inc · Horizon Community Funds of Northern Kentucky · Duke Energy Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Robert a & Marian K Kennedy Charitable Trust · The Fischer Family Foundation 2008 · Sutphin Family Foundation Ica · Marge & Charles J Schott Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Zembrodt Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Zembrodt Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Zembrodt Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph