Skip to content

· Private foundation

Zahn Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$39kFood & Nutrition$33kPublic Safety & Disaster$29kHealth$26kAnimals$24kArts & Culture$19kEnvironment$10kEducation$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$344k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HATFIELD FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION$10,000
TINY SEED PROJECT$5,000
DAKIN PIONEER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY$5,000
NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $5k → 12%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $2k → 12%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $2k → 12%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $2k → 12%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $2k → 12%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $2k → 12%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $2k → 12%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$193k · 13 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$193k
$11k

Still filing today

54%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Public Safety & DisasterAnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DP
    DAKIN PIONEER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +100%
  • NS
    NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +44%
  • THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $14k · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • HH
    HATFIELD HISTORICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • HA
    HATFIELD AMERICAN LEGION POST 344
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE FRANKLIN COUNTY
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Survival Centers Inc

Connect residents of hampshire and franklin counties to food, clothing, healthcare, wellness and community, primarily through volunteer efforts.

Human Services
2
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
3
Humane Society of Yates County

The humane society of yates county exists to promote the welfare of companion and domestic animals through educational programs and initiatives that reduce pet overpopulation, enrich adoptions, and encourage responsible pet ownership.

Animals
4
Danbury Animal Welfare Society

Danbury animal welfare society , inc.(daws) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of animals in our community and beyond. we promote responsible pet guardianship and the humane treatment of animals, and work toward…

Animals
5
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

—
6
Haymarket People's Fund Inc

Haymarket people's fund is an anti-racist and multi-cultural foundation that is committed to strengthening the movement for social justice in new england. through grantmaking, fundraising, and capacity building, we support grassroots…

—
7
Healing Abuse Working for Change Inc

To create social change by taking action against personal and societal patterns of violence and oppression. hawc provides services and support to victims of domestic violence in 23 cities and towns on massachusetts' north shore.

—
8
Humane Society of Greater Dayton

We advance the health, welfare and safety of animals and people.

Animals
9
Hazleton Animal Shelter Association Inc

Provide food shelter and care (including veterinary care) to homeless animals of the greater hazleton area.

Animals
10
Healthy Start Coalition of Hillsborough County Inc

To improve the health and well-being of pregnant women, children and families in hillsborough county

Human Services
11
The Humane Society of Harford County Inc

The humane society of harford county's mission is to promote the humane treatment of homeless, stray and abandoned animals by providing shelter, care, adoptions and community education.

Animals
12
Humane Society of the High Plains

The humane society of the high plains' mission is to foster the humane treatment of animals through education, human-animal relations, shelter, cruelty reporting and animal control.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northampton Survival Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hatfield Firefighters Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN LEGION POST 344: $14,000 · OtherAMERICAN LEGION POST 344THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $14,000 · OtherTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INCHOSPICE OF THE FISHER HOME: $14,000 · OtherHOSPICE OF THE FISHER HOMEIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAFE PASSAGE INC: $14,000 · OtherSAFE PASSAGE INCHATFIELD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $8,000 · OtherHATFIELD EDUCATION FOUNDATIONFRIEND OF HATFIELD COUNCIL ON AGING: $7,000 · OtherFRIEND OF HATFIELD COUNCIL ON AGINGHATFIELD HISTORICAL CENTER: $5,000 · Other+3 more: $6,000 · Other+3 moreHatfield Firefighters Association: $29,000 · Public Safety & DisasterHatfield Firefig…DAKIN PIONEER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $24,000 · AnimalsDAKIN PIONEER…NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER INC: $19,000 · Human ServicesNORTHAMPTO…HATFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $14,000 · Arts & CultureCANCER CONNECTION INC: $12,000 · HealthTINY SEED PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Environment
Other$96,000Public Safety & Disaster$29,000Animals$24,000Human Services$19,000Arts & Culture$14,000Health$12,000Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHatfield Firefighters Association: $29,000 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetDAKIN PIONEER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $24,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER INC: $19,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHATFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $14,000 over 7y, 13% of budgetSAFE PASSAGE INC: $14,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER CONNECTION INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTINY SEED PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hatfield Firefighters Association ↗
  • Who funds DAKIN PIONEER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds HATFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE PASSAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds CANCER CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds TINY SEED PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Easthampton Savings Bank Foundation IncMA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Easthampton Savings Bank Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Western Massachusetts · Florence Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · The Beveridge Family Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Zahn Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Zahn Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Safe Passage Inc: 64% of income from government
  • The Food Bank of Western Massachusetts Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Tiny Seed Project Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Zahn Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph