Skip to content

· Private foundation

Yvonne H Simard Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$501k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.1MHealth$792kHuman Services$587kEducation$470kInternational$127kEmployment$80kCrime & Legal$78kAnimals$75kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $216k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $220k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUGAR GROVE CHURCH OF CHIRST$70,000
DEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION$50,000
SECOND MILE MISSION$50,000
CHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION$50,000
KINGS CROSSING PRISON MINISTRIES$40,000
SHARE CENTER-TERRELL TEXAS$27,000
THE HARRIS SCHOOL$25,000
CREATIVE DREAMS OUTREACH CENTER$20,000
KINGS CROSSING CHURCH OF CHRIST$20,000
SOUTH TEXAS LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND$15,000
TEXAS STATE AQUARIUM$15,000
ARROW ACADEMY$12,000
RAISE UP FAMILIES$12,000
BUCKNER FOUNDATION-RIO GRANDE CHILDREN'S HOME$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS (TEXAS GULF COAST REGION)$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $503k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MEALS ON WHEELS COLLIN COUNTY: $5k → 5%CENTRAL TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOME: $2k → 10%SUNNY GLENN CHILDRENS HOME: $8k → 23%SUNNY GLENN CHILDRENS HOME: $6k → 23%SECOND MILE MISSION: $50k → 8%SUNNY GLENN CHILDRENS HOME: $6k → 23%SECOND MILE MISSION CENTER: $50k → 8%SUNNY GLENN CHILDRENS HOME: $6k → 23%SECOND MILE MISSION CENTER: $40k → 8%SUNNY GLENN CHILDRENS HOME: $6k → 23%SECOND MILE MISSION CENTER: $40k → 8%SUNNY GLENN CHILDRENS HOME: $6k → 23%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $4k → 27%SECOND MILE MISSION CENTER: $40k → 8%SUNNY GLENN CHILDRENS HOME: $6k → 23%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $4k → 27%SECOND MILE MISSION CENTER: $37k → 8%SUNNY GLENN CHILDRENS HOME: $6k → 23%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $4k → 27%SECOND MILE MISSION CENTER: $35k → 8%BUCKNER FOUNDATION: $4k → 27%SECOND MILE MISSION CENTER: $33k → 8%SECOND MILE MISSION CENTER: $32k → 8%RAISE UP FAMILIES: $12k → 16%RAISE UP FAMILIES: $8k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS-GREATER HOUSTON: $10k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS (TEXAS GULF COAST REGION): $10k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS-GREATER HOUSTON: $5k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS-GREATER HOUSTON: $5k → 16%MISSION OF MERCY INC: $5k → 17%MISSION OF MERCY INC: $5k → 17%MISSION OF MERCY INC: $5k → 17%MISSION OF MERCY: $5k → 17%MISSION OF MERCY INC: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 43 repeat orgs$216k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
15

Total granted

$3.5M
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+24%

Still filing today

58%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $163k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalEducationPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DM
    DEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $392k · revenue +197%
  • SM
    SECOND MILE MISSION CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $357k · revenue +33%
  • TH
    THE HARRIS SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $105k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS HOUSTON
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • TW
    The Way Home Adoption Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue -98%
  • FS
    FREEDOM STORY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Retreat Home for Children

Our mission is to show the love of christ to each and every child and family towhom we serve and beyond. we do this by creating a culture where the needs of children,families, and staff are seen and met in creative and innovative ways.

Crime & Legal
2
Central Texas Christian School Inc

To educate students with the transforming truth of christ, inspiring academic excellence, godly character, and integrity in life pursuits.

—
3
Christian Home of Pecos

Christain Home

Crime & Legal
4
Children's Physician Services of South Texas

Provision of pediatric primary and subspecialty healthcare to patients in corpus christi and surrounding areas of south texas regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
5
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of San Antonio Inc

To provide a safe, caring, and temporary home away from home for the families of children receiving essential medical services in san antonio, texas.

Health
6
Children's Aid Society of West Tx Inc

To provide shelter, supervision, and counseling for children in crisis; to cooperate with other agencies in order to resolve problems related to the welfare of these children; to assist the families of these children in seeking possible…

Human Services
7
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Central Texas Inc

To provide lodging and support services to families with critically ill or injured children.

Health
8
Family Link Treatment Services Inc

A state of texas licensed foster care-adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Health
9
Colleyville Covenant Christian

The mission is to provide a biblically based classical college preparatory education that inspires a passion for excellence a heart of grace and the character of Christ.

Education
10
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
11
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
12
Texas Baptist Children's Home Inc

Texas baptist children's home embraces children and families in need in order to empower and equip them for a promising future.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Corpus Christi Metro Ministriesinc; the most unlike its peers is The Prosthetic Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
24/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SUGAR GROVE CHURCH OF CHRIST: $510,000 · OtherSUGAR GROVE CHURCH OF CHRISTKINGS CROSSING CHURCH OF CHRIST: $462,000 · OtherKINGS CROSSING CHURCH OF CHRISTCHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $252,000 · OtherCHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATIONCHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDA: $170,000 · OtherCHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDASHARE CENTER: $159,000 · OtherSHARE CENTERTEXAS STATE AQUARIUM: $75,000 · Other+33 more: $539,000 · Other+33 moreSECOND MILE MISSION CENTER: $357,000 · Human ServicesSECOND MILE MISSI…Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc: $50,000 · Human ServicesSunny Glen Childr…MISSION OF MERCY INC: $37,000 · Human ServicesMISSION OF MERCY …American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $30,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National…RAISEUP FAMILIES: $20,000 · Human Services+7 more: $65,458 · Human Services+7 moreDEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $392,000 · PhilanthropyDEL MAR COLLE…CORPUS CHRISTI EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $36,000 · PhilanthropyCORPUS CHRIST…Driscoll Children's Hospital: $97,000 · HealthSOUTH TEXAS LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $80,000 · HealthCORPUS CHRISTI PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $53,000 · HealthTHE SUNSHINE KIDS FOUNDATION: $22,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES GREATER HOUSTON INC: $10,000 · HealthTHE HARRIS SCHOOL INC: $105,000 · EducationMEADOWS PLACE PRESCHOOL: $10,000 · EducationEDUCATING CHILDRENS FUTURE COMMUNITY CENTER: $10,000 · EducationLILIAS PLACE INC: $105,000 · InternationalGlobal Samaritan Resources Inc: $4,000 · International+1 more: $3,000 · InternationalLifeline Chaplaincy Inc: $33,500 · ReligionMISSION COALITION: $12,000 · Religion
Other$2,167,000Human Services$559,458Philanthropy$428,000Health$262,000Education$125,000International$112,000Religion$45,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $392,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetSECOND MILE MISSION CENTER: $357,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetLILIAS PLACE INC: $105,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetTHE HARRIS SCHOOL INC: $105,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetDriscoll Children's Hospital: $97,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $80,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $53,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetSunny Glen Children's Home Inc: $50,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMISSION OF MERCY INC: $37,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $36,000 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetLifeline Chaplaincy Inc: $33,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE COASTAL BEND: $29,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCREATIVE DREAMS OUTREACH CENTER INC: $28,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetTHE SUNSHINE KIDS FOUNDATION: $22,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI HOPE HOUSE INC: $20,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetRAISEUP FAMILIES: $20,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI METRO MINISTRIESINC: $17,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI POLICE FOUNDATION: $16,458 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetBUCKNER FOUNDATION INC: $14,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION COALITION: $12,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTENNIS SUCCESS INC: $11,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetMEADOWS PLACE PRESCHOOL: $10,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetEDUCATING CHILDRENS FUTURE COMMUNITY CENTER: $10,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetThe Way Home Adoption Inc: $8,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS COLLIN COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE COASTAL BEND INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWEST SIDE HELPING HAND: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGlobal Samaritan Resources Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYOUTH EQUIPPED TO SUCCEED: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Freedom Story: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM I: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PROSTHETIC FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND MILE MISSION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LILIAS PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HARRIS SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Driscoll Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH TEXAS LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds CORPUS CHRISTI PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds MISSION OF MERCY INC ↗
  • Who funds CORPUS CHRISTI EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Lifeline Chaplaincy Inc ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE COASTAL BEND ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVE DREAMS OUTREACH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SUNSHINE KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CORPUS CHRISTI HOPE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds RAISEUP FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds CORPUS CHRISTI METRO MINISTRIESINC ↗
  • Who funds CORPUS CHRISTI POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BUCKNER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION COALITION ↗
  • Who funds TENNIS SUCCESS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ed Rachal FoundationTX38.4× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ed Rachal Foundation · Behmann Brothers Foundation · The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · Allen Lovelace Moore and Blanche Davis Moore Foundation · Susser Family Foundation · Earl C Sams Foundation Inc · Coastal Bend Community Foundation · Dr and Mrs Hugh a Kennedy Foundation · Laverne & Thomas Howell Foundation · Devary Durrill Foundation Inc · United Way of the Coastal Bend Inc · James R Dougherty Jr Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yvonne H Simard Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yvonne H Simard Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Yvonne H Simard Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Yvonne H Simard Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Yvonne H Simard’s filings →

    More from the funding graph