Skip to content
Yvette & Arthur Eder Charitable Foundation Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Yvette & Arthur Eder Charitable Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$900k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$3.7MHuman Services$2.9MInternational$2.6MReligion$1.8MPhilanthropy$403kRecreation & Sports$250kArts & Culture$83kCivil Rights$75kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $574k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.7M
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LA'ARETZ$900,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$500,000
BELEV ECHAD$280,000
HAIFA FOUNDATION NORTH AMERICA INC$224,000
TEMPLE BETH SHALOM$100,000
CAMP RISING SUN$100,000
MAKE A WISH CONNECTICUT$100,000
CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER$50,000
ST BRIDGET OF SWEDEN PARISH$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%A SHOT FOR LIFE: $500 → 8%CAMP KESEM: $50k → 14%LA'ARETZ: $1.0M → 20%LA'ARETZ: $900k → 20%LA'ARETZ: $36k → 20%BELEV ECHAD: $280k → 17%BELEV ECHAD: $72k → 17%CONNECTICUT HOSPICE INC: $10k → 12%COVE CENTER FOR GRIEVING: $10k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER NEW HAVEN: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
NM
TN
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.6M · 20 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
32

Total granted

$9.6M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
0%

Still filing today

65%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureRecreation & SportsPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • L
    LA-ARETZ
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +612%
  • CR
    Camp Rising Sun Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $917k · revenue +252% · 49% of their budget
  • CC
    CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $705k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • YO
    YMCA OF METRO HARTFORD
    one grant, 2019 · $308k
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $300k · revenue +99%
  • CB
    CAMP BISHOP SLIN CHRISTA
    one grant, 2017 · $190k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
2
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

—
3
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

—
4
Sherit Isroel
—
5
American Friends of Herzog Hospital Inc

The organization was formed to provide financial support to fund services, capital projects, clinical research, and purchase of new equipment for herzog hospital in jerusalem, which is the 3rd largest hospital in jerusalem and is israel's…

Health
6
Ziv Partners Inc

Raise funds in support of ziv medical center, which delivers trauma care, advanced mental health treatment, and inclusive healing to israels most diverse and at-risk communities.

Health
7
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
10
American Friends of Wgh Western Galilee Hospital Nahariya C/O the Lapin Group

Promote and support the galilee medical center by broadening its capability to provide the highest quality of medical care and other services to over 650,000 residents living along israel's northern border.

International
11
Adi Israel Foundation Inc

Aleh Israel Foundation, Inc.(The Foundation)is a Foundation that provides support to rehabilitative centers caring for most severely disabled children in Israel.

International
12
Hand in Hand American Friends of the Center for Jewish-Arab Education in Isra

To promote partnership and coexistence among jewish and arab citizens of israel by providing support for integrated schools and providing funding for and assisting in program development in connection with israeli nonprofits with similar…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Foundation of Greater New Haven Inc; the most unlike its peers is Southington Rotary Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/37
Grantees still filing
20/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAKE A WISH CONNECTICUT: $2,060,000 · OtherMAKE A WISH CONNECTICUTST BRIDGET OF SWEDEN PARISH: $760,000 · OtherST BRIDGET OF SWEDEN PARISHGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC: $700,000 · OtherGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INCHaifa Foundation North America Inc: $324,000 · OtherHaifa Foundation North America IncYMCA OF METRO HARTFORD: $308,461 · OtherCATHEDRAL OF ST JOSEPH: $275,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH SHALOM: $250,000 · OtherCENTRAL SYNAGOGUE: $221,200 · Other+19 more: $888,200 · Other+19 moreCamp Rising Sun Inc: $916,600 · HealthCamp Rising Sun IncCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $705,000 · HealthCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDI…YALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL: $315,000 · HealthYALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITALST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $300,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH…DANCES WITH WOOD INC: $200,000 · HealthDANCES WITH WOOD INCHartford Hospital: $175,000 · HealthHartford Hospital+5 more: $257,000 · Health+5 moreLA-ARETZ: $1,959,400 · Human ServicesLA-ARETZBELEV ECHAD INC: $352,000 · Human ServicesBELEV ECHAD INC+5 more: $75,900 · Human ServicesJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $518,000 · InternationalCENTER FOR ISRAEL EDUCATION INC: $50,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · International+2 more: $36,000 · InternationalTHE GUILFORD ART CENTER INC: $65,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $18,000 · Arts & CultureJEWISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC: $53,200 · ReligionZAKA NORTH INC: $18,000 · ReligionMorgan's Wonderland: $60,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$5,786,861Health$2,868,600Human Services$2,387,300International$654,000Arts & Culture$83,000Religion$71,200Recreation & Sports$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLA-ARETZ: $1,959,400 over 3y, 16% of budgetCamp Rising Sun Inc: $916,600 over 9y, 49% of budgetCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $705,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC: $700,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $518,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBELEV ECHAD INC: $352,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHaifa Foundation North America Inc: $324,000 over 2y, 42% of budgetYALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL: $315,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $300,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANCES WITH WOOD INC: $200,000 over 2y, 49% of budgetHartford Hospital: $175,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $80,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCIRCLE OF CARE FOR FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH CANCER INC: $75,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetTHE GUILFORD ART CENTER INC: $65,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetLIVFREE INC: $62,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetMorgan's Wonderland: $60,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetJEWISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC: $53,200 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCENTER FOR ISRAEL EDUCATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetCamp Kesem National: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetGaylord Hospital INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZAKA NORTH INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GUILFORD FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHE CONNECTICUT HOSPICE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEACH'S NEET FEET: $10,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetThe Cove Center for Grieving Children Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF GREATER NEW HAV: $5,400 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSouthington Rotary Trust: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetA SHOT FOR LIFE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundEder Family Foundatio…The Morris & Sylvia T…The Community Foundat…Equitable Foundation …The Pfizer Foundation…Aetna Foundation IncGe Aerospace Foundati…Vanguard Charitable E…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…
Jewish Communal FundNY14.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Eder Family Foundation Inc · The Morris & Sylvia Trachten Family Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · Equitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yvette & Arthur Eder Charitable Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yvette & Arthur Eder Charitable Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Gaylord Hospital Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Connecticut Children's Medical Center: 5% of income from government
  • The Guilford Art Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Yale New Haven Hospital: 0% of income from government
  • Hartford Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Yvette & Arthur Eder Charitable Foundation Trust?

Find your warmest path to Yvette & Arthur Eder Charitable Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Yvette & Arthur Eder’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home