Skip to content

· Private foundation

Yudelson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$497kEmployment$33kHealth$28kArts & Culture$16kAnimals$11kReligion$8kCommunity Improvement$3kMembership Benefit$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,048
Median grant
1
States reached
$1
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL CATS LIVES MATTER INC$5,048
CAT PROTECTION COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%PEDIATRIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $400 → 10%HUDSON STAGE COMPANY: $3k → 9%THE NEW YORK JETS FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%CENTRAL YESHIVA BETH JOSEPH: $5k → 20%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $500 → 14%DANCE MARATHON AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $1k → 14%THE GREENWICH TOWN PARTY: $3k → 9%BRIDGET CHERIE ARTIST SCHOLARS: $1k → 14%GALLOWAY SCHOOL FUND: $250 → 13%GIVING TREE THRIFT LLC: $33k → 14%ALPHA SIGMA FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $100 → 14%CAROL'S CRUSADE FOR A CURE FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%SMILE: $5k → 12%INTERSTITIAL CYSTITIS ASSOCIATION: $600 → 6%CHABAD OF ARMONK CHAPPAQUA & PLEASANTVILLE: $2k → 9%ST MARTIN'S EPISCOPAL FUND: $250 → 17%GREENWICH UNITED WAY: $375 → 9%GIVING TREE THRIFT LLC: $162k → 13%CAROL'S CRUSADE FOR A CURE: $500 → 7%SMILE: $5k → 12%JACOB BURNS FILM CENTER: $350 → 9%CHABAD OF GREENWICH: $360 → 9%GIVING TREE THRIFT LLC: $150k → 13%HUDSON STAGE CO: $18k → 9%GIVING TREE THRIFT LLC: $135k → 13%HUDSON STAGE CO: $10k → 9%GIVING TREE THRIFT LLC: $50k → 13%HUDSON STAGE CO: $5k → 9%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $200 → 13%CORPORATE ANGEL NETWORK: $4k → 9%CORPORATE ANGEL NETWORK: $790 → 9%COMMUNITY HOUSING INNOVATIONS: $300 → 9%CAT PROTECTION COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER: $3k → 9%CAT PROTECTION COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER: $3k → 9%ALL CATS LIVES MATTER INC: $5k → 9%NEUBERGER MUSEUM OF ART: $5k → 9%NEUBERGER MUSEUM OF ART: $5k → 9%NEUBERGER MUSEUM OF ART PURCHASE COLLEGE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IN
NJ
CT
CA
VA
DE
TN
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$592k · 6 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
23

Total granted

$592k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-26%
+36%

Still filing today

17%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GT
    GIVING TREE THRIFT LLC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $529k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2017–2020 · $33k
  • S
    SMILE
    2× · 2017–2021 · $10k

Funded once

  • CL
    CONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +74%
  • CY
    CENTRAL YESHIVA BETH JOSEPH
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • GT
    GREENWICH TOWN PARTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +58%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Northwell Health Cancer Institute Inc

Northwell health cancer institute is part of northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
3
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
4
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
5
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
6
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
7
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
8
American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network Inc

Driven by a vision to end cancer as we know it for everyone, the american cancer society cancer action network, inc. (acs can) advocates for evidence-based public policies to reduce the cancer burden by engaging advocates across the…

Health
9
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
10
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
11
Cancer Research Institute Inc

See schedule ocri is a nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing cancer immunotherapy through scientific discovery and global collaboration. since 1953, cri has funded research that deepens understanding of the immune system and its…

Health
12
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Cancer Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is New York Jets Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GIVING TREE THRIFT LLC: $529,248 · OtherGIVING TREE THRIFT LLCIndividual grant recipient: $33,280 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+21 more: $51,993 · Other+21 moreCONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthCORPORATE ANGEL NETWORK INC: $4,290 · Health+3 more: $800 · HealthGREENWICH TOWN PARTY INC: $3,290 · Community ImprovementJACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC: $350 · Arts & Culture
Other$614,521Health$15,090Community Improvement$3,290Arts & Culture$350

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCORPORATE ANGEL NETWORK INC: $4,290 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGREENWICH TOWN PARTY INC: $3,290 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUDSON STAGE COMPANY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetInterstitial Cystitis Association of America Inc: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEDIATRIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREENWICH INC: $375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSING INNOVATIONS INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATE ANGEL NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENWICH TOWN PARTY INC ↗
  • Who funds HUDSON STAGE COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK JETS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Interstitial Cystitis Association of America Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds PEDIATRIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREENWICH INC ↗
  • Who funds JACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOUSING INNOVATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yudelson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yudelson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Yudelson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph