Skip to content

· Private foundation

Yu and Wei Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$171k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$139k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Science & Tech$509kEducation$422kArts & Culture$108kEnvironment$15kHealth$10kSocial Science$6kReligion$1kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $27k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $139k
$11,533
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Peking Forest Univ Education Foundation$138,889
Peking University$15,374
Individual grant recipient$11,533
Peach Foundation$4,800
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 81% of grant dollars ($895k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 19% that went abroad ($211k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Austin Chen Tsai Foundation: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 19% of all-years giving ($211k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
China$210k · 10 grants
Canada$1k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of Yu and Wei Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Yu and Wei Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 19% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$731k · 7 repeat orgs$296k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
15

Total granted

$731k
$141k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-33%
0%

Still filing today

71%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $155k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentRecreation & SportsInternationalCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE RAY WU MEMORIAL FUND INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $508k · revenue -67% · 75% of their budget
  • SU
    Stanford University - REAP
    2× · 2020–2023 · $90k
  • TP
    THE PEACH FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $62k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • RW
    Ray Wu Memorial Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $68k
  • BC
    Biolnnovation Cultural Development Co
    one grant, 2023 · $35k
  • FU
    FUDAN UNIVERSITY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Foundation of America (Sjtufa)
Education
2
Fudan Fuzhong Overseas Foundationinc

Fudan Fuzhong Overseas Foundation, Inc. ("FFOF") was established by five alumni from Fudan Fuzhong, the high school affiliated with Fudan University in Shanghai, China. Fudan University is one of the leading institutes of higher education…

Education
3
University of Science and Technology of China Alumni Foundation

Promote the excellence of members of USTC and helping the students with finacial needs. Promote the academic and cultural exchange between USTC and researchers and students in USA Raising donations from alumni and elsewhere. Present…

International
4
University of California Berkeley Foundation

The university of california berkeley foundation's mission is to advance the interest and promote the welfare of the university of california, berkeley (the "university"), to develop and increase the facilities of the university and to…

Education
5
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
6
Taiwanese United Fund
Arts & Culture
7
Tmt International Observatory Llc

Tmt international observatory (tio) was founded by the members listed below exclusively to further charitable, educational and scientific purposes and, within such limits, to advance scientific knowledge and education through the study,…

Science & Tech
8
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
9
Chinese Bioscience Association

The chinese bioscience association functions as a net work among professional from biotech / pharmaceutical industry and the academic fields such as people in stanford university, and students from colleges, universities and seniors in…

Science & Tech
10
Uc Chinese Alumni Foundation
—
11
University of California San Francisco Foundation

Organization's mission ====================== the university of california, san francisco(ucsf) is among the world's leading universities dedicated to advancing health worldwide through biomedical research, graduate-level education in the…

Education
12
The David and Lucile Packard Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tahoe Fund; the most unlike its peers is The Austin Chen Tsai Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE RAY WU MEMORIAL FUND INC: $508,290 · EducationTHE RAY WU MEMORIAL FUND INCTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $80,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITYTHE PEACH FOUNDATION: $62,353 · EducationTHE PEACH FOUNDATION+1 more: $10,000 · EducationPeking Forest Univ Education Foundation: $138,889 · OtherPeking Forest Univ Education FoundationStanford University - REAP: $90,000 · OtherStanford University - REAPRay Wu Memorial Foundation: $68,242 · OtherRay Wu Memorial FoundationBiolnnovation Cultural Development Co: $35,000 · OtherBiolnnovation Cultural Development CoIndividual grant recipient: $30,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPeking University: $15,374 · Other+10 more: $21,807 · Other+10 moreFANGCAO READING CIRCLE: $24,257 · InternationalTAHOE FUND: $15,000 · EnvironmentTHE BAYHELIX GROUP: $4,091 · Community ImprovementTHE AUSTIN CHEN TSAI FOUNDATION: $1,100 · Human ServicesTahoe Rim Trail Association: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsKQED INC: $840 · Arts & Culture
Education$660,643Other$399,512International$24,257Environment$15,000Community Improvement$4,091Human Services$1,100Recreation & Sports$1,000Arts & Culture$840

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE RAY WU MEMORIAL FUND INC: $508,290 over 6y, 75% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $80,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PEACH FOUNDATION: $62,353 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetFANGCAO READING CIRCLE: $24,257 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetTAHOE FUND: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFUDAN UNIVERSITY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BAYHELIX GROUP: $4,091 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetTHE AUSTIN CHEN TSAI FOUNDATION: $1,100 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF PLANT BIOLOGISTS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTahoe Rim Trail Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKQED INC: $840 over 7y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE RAY WU MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE PEACH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FANGCAO READING CIRCLE ↗
  • Who funds TAHOE FUND ↗
  • Who funds FUDAN UNIVERSITY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BAYHELIX GROUP ↗
  • Who funds THE AUSTIN CHEN TSAI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PLANT BIOLOGISTS ↗
  • Who funds Tahoe Rim Trail Association ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yu and Wei Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yu and Wei Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • American Society of Plant Biologists: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Yu and Wei Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Yu and Wei Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Yu and Wei’s filings →

More from the funding graph