Skip to content
Youngbaum Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Youngbaum Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$303k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$84kHealth$63kEducation$50kPhilanthropy$50kAnimals$48kEmployment$38kArts & Culture$35kCommunity Improvement$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $233k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Freedom Forum Inc$50,000
Eckerd Connects$27,500
Brevard Achievement Center Inc$25,000
Hamlin School$25,000
Promise in Brevard$25,000
Boys & Girls Clubs of Central FL$25,000
East Coast Zoological Society of Florida Inc$25,000
Sterne School$25,000
Family Promise of Brevard Inc$25,000
No Penny Opera$10,000
Health First Foundation Inc$10,000
Foolproof Foundation Inc$10,000
Campaign Legal Center$5,000
Children of Shelters$3,000
Compass Family Services$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Eckerd Connects: $28k → 12%Compass Family Services: $3k → 10%Raphael House of San Francisco: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$148k · 3 repeat orgs$278k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
2

Total granted

$148k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-1%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $228k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesEmploymentAnimalsArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BREVARD ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $50k · revenue 0%
  • PI
    PROMISE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $50k · revenue 0%
  • EC
    EAST COAST ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF FLORIDA INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $48k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • BC
    BREVARD CULTURAL ALLIANCE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -31%
  • TB
    THE BREVARD NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT COALITION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hubbard House Inc

Safety, empowerment, and social change for victims of domestic violence and their families. to that end we offer a full compendium of services for victims of domestic violence.

Human Services
2
Space Coast Habitat for Humanity Inc

Space coast habitat for humanity believes that everyone deserves a decent place to live. we bring people together to build homes, communities and hope.

Housing & Shelter
3
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
4
Faces Sf

Our mission is to nurture, teach and empower children and families to transform their lives by providing critical assistance to low-income families with early childhood development, workforce training, school-age enrichment, and family…

Education
5
Housing for Homeless Inc

To increase and provide affordable, accessible, and quality housing solutions and supportive services that promote self-sufficiency and independence for veterans, individuals, and families experiencing housing instability and homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
6
Housing Opportunities Mortgage Assist & Effective Neighborhood Solutions Inc

The mission of h.o.m.e.s. is to provide quality community and economic development, benefiting at risk and disadvantaged residents and neighborhoods in broward county, florida.

Housing & Shelter
7
Brooklyn Bureau of Community Service

Bcs partners with people to overcome obstacles on their pathway toward self-determination (see schedule o).

Human Services
8
Family Promise North Shore Boston Inc

Family promise north shore boston's mission is to prevent and end family homelessness. we promote access to economic opportunity and housing stability through a holistic, family-centered, community-based response.

Human Services
9
Foundation for the Homeless Inc

Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.

—
10
Family Promise of Los Angeles

Family promise of the south bay assists families experiencing housing insecurity with short-term shelter, case management, and navigation with the goal of creating a sustainable solution for their family.

Human Services
11
Family Promise of Greater Roanoke

To empower homeless families with children to achieve sustainable independence through a community based response. building a community where every family has a home, livelihood and the chance to build a better future.

Human Services
12
Family Supportive Housing Inc

Family supportive housing, inc. is committed to the entire family and encourages families to stay intact while addressing their needs for food, shelter, education, and employment. the organization provides shelter, housing opportunities…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Brevard Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Foolproof Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
3/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROMISE INC: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterPROMISE INCFAMILY PROMISE OF BREVARD INC: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE OF BR…HAMILTON FAMILIES: $3,000 · Housing & ShelterBREVARD ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC: $50,000 · EmploymentBREVARD ACHIEVE…THE FOOLPROOF FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EmploymentTHE FOOLPROOF F…THE FREEDOM FORUM INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyTHE FREEDOM F…EAST COAST ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF FLORIDA INC: $48,000 · AnimalsEAST COAST Z…THE HAMLIN SCHOOL: $25,000 · OtherTHE HAMLIN SCHOOLHealth First Foundation Inc: $10,000 · OtherHealth First Foundation IncNO PENNY OPERA: $10,000 · OtherNO PENNY OPERABREVARD CULTURAL ALLIANCE INC: $25,000 · OtherBREVARD CULTURAL ALLIANCE INCTHE BREVARD NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT COALITION INC: $25,000 · OtherTHE BREVARD NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPME…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $25,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL FLOR…THE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC: $5,000 · Other+2 more: $6,000 · OtherECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC: $27,500 · Human ServicesCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $3,000 · Human ServicesRAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesSTERNE SCHOOL: $25,000 · Education
Housing & Shelter$78,000Employment$60,000Philanthropy$50,000Animals$48,000Other$131,000Human Services$33,500Education$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBREVARD ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROMISE INC: $50,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetEAST COAST ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF FLORIDA INC: $48,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC: $27,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HAMLIN SCHOOL: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTERNE SCHOOL: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BREVARD NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT COALITION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOOLPROOF FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetHomeless Prenatal Program Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAMILTON FAMILIES: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Freedom Forum IncCommunity Foundation …Jim and Jonnie Swann …Embraer Foundation IncThe Margaret Heins Fo…Truist Foundation IncMorgan Stanley Global…Raymond James Charita…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…The Blackbaud Giving …American Endowment Fo…
The Freedom Forum IncDC22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Freedom Forum Inc · Community Foundation for Brevard Inc · Jim and Jonnie Swann Corp · Embraer Foundation Inc · The Margaret Heins Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Youngbaum Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Youngbaum Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Brevard Achievement Center Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Eckerd Youth Alternatives Inc: 12% of income from government
  • East Coast Zoological Society of Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Promise Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Youngbaum Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Youngbaum Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Youngbaum’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home