Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Young Living Foundation

The organization works to protect and empower the world's young through championing education, developing enterprise, and ending exploitation.

$3.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$7.1MInternational$2.6MEducation$2.1MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.3MHealth$680kRecreation & Sports$300kFood & Nutrition$292kEnvironment$176kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $171,050 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,516,541 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,345,491 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $106k
$40,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$8.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Foundation Escalara$56,050
Wine to Water$50,000
Givv Hub$40,000
Seed Programs Inc$15,000
SOLA$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $8.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FREE YEZIDI FOUNDATION USA: $150k → 17%HOPEFUL HANDBAGS GLOBAL: $10k → 6%RELEASESARA: $21k → 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TECHO PARA MI: $50k → 15%FOSTER KIDS KC: $11k → 15%HOPE FOR JUSTICE: $3.9M → 14%MITCHELL AREA SAFEHOUSE: $20k → 14%HOPE FOR JUSTICE: $1.7M → 14%HOPE FOR JUSTICE: $1.4M → 14%Hope for Justice: $1.1M → 14%HOPE FOR JUSTICE: $30k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
OH
NJ
RI
UT
CO
MO
AZ
TN
NC
DC
HI
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $3.3M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South America$3.1M · 96% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Operations

South Asia$64k · 2% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: Operations · Support · Service Trip

North America (Canada and Mexico)$56k · 2% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: Support

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$20k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Disaster relief

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 14 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
33

Total granted

$13M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+16%

Still filing today

93%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    Hope for Justice Inc
    5× · 2019–2023 · $8.1M · revenue +81% · 87% of their budget
  • RC
    ROOTS CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL
    4× · 2020–2023 · $870k · revenue +54%
  • SH
    SOLE HOPE INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $820k · revenue +30% · 31% of their budget

Funded once

  • HO
    HEART OF AMERICA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $412k · revenue +28%
  • GF
    Goals for Girls Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $300k · revenue +16%
  • SO
    SCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP-AFGHANISTAN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue +73%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Joy International

JOY International is dedicated to the prevention of child trafficking and to the freedom, healing, and empowerment of trafficked children, teens, and young adults worldwide.

Human Services
2
Zoe Empowers

Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…

International
3
Empowering Lives International

Empowering Lives International (ELI) ignites world changers. We equip families and orphans to crush poverty, embrace Christ, and share their transformation with others through their God-honoring income, their deepening relationship with…

Religion
4
Girls Hope Rescue Mission

To rescue Kenyan Girls from GBV

Human Services
5
Mukti International

Mukti is a Sanskrit word that means "freedom from oppression and exploitation". Our goal is to see women and children find pathways to freedom. We partner with organizations around Asia that are on the frontlines helping to rescue and…

Crime & Legal
6
Too Young to Wed Inc

TYTWs mission is to disrupt cycles of violence and exclusion, elevating girls as they embrace their power and lead change in their communities and beyond.

Arts & Culture
7
Sower of Seeds International Ministries

SOS provides assistance to poor and marginalized people in the USA & other countries. SOS feeds the hungry, drills water wells, contributes to schools and operates an orphanage. SOS also rescues and rehabilitates victims of sex trafficking.

Religion
8
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
9
Assist International Inc

Assist international partners with changemakers around the world to provide solutions that save lives and build resilient communities. we accomplish our mission with actionable projects that make a lasting and sustainable impact on the…

International
10
Hope for the Fatherless

HFTF serves orphaned and vulnerable children in Ethiopia, and its mission is to see every child thriving in a loving family. HFTF accomplishes this through five primary initiatives: in-country adoption training and placement, family…

International
11
Hands of Hope African Outreach

Hands of Hope African Outreach empowers vulnerable women and children in East Africa by partnering with small community-based organizations We support locally led initiatives that provide vocational training access to education healthcare…

Philanthropy
12
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Roger Williams University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-12 SchoolsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Domestic Violence ServicesFaith-Based Social ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity Food PantriesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…School District FoundationsCommunity FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 18. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%4%<5yr14%24%5–10yr17%33%10–20yr13%20%20–35yr11%7%35–55yr24%11%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr14%7%5–10yr17%24%10–20yr13%65%20–35yr11%2%35–55yr24%2%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/48
the rest of the field
13%
4,628/36,352

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/45
Grantees still filing
29/45
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Hope for Justice Inc — $8,088,483 · Human ServicesHope for Justice Inc+6 more — $261,272 · Human ServicesSegner Ministries Inc Healing Faith Uganda — $1,093,110 · InternationalSegner Ministries Inc He…SOLE HOPE INC — $820,014 · InternationalSOLE HOPE INCFOUNDATION ESCALERA INC — $410,550 · InternationalFOUNDATION ESCALERA INCInternational Rescue Committee INC — $225,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Com…FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC — $210,424 · InternationalFEED MY STARVING CHILDRE…SEED PROGRAMS INC — $165,000 · InternationalWHOLIVES INC — $126,000 · International+4 more — $233,605 · International+4 moreGIVV HUB — $538,917 · Community ImprovementHEART OF AMERICA FOUNDATION — $412,490 · Community Improvement+1 more — $21,525 · Community ImprovementROOTS CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL — $870,000 · Education+3 more — $30,100 · EducationSCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP-AFGHANISTAN INC — $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $61,400 · OtherZULOO HUMANITARIAN OUTREACH — $60,000 · OtherICONNECT OUTREACH INC — $53,000 · OtherPREVENT CHILD ABUSE UTAH — $50,000 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH — $50,000 · OtherVETERANS PATH INC — $40,609 · OtherALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC — $100,000 · OtherMothers Without Borders — $45,000 · OtherWine to Water — $50,000 · Other+12 more — $205,184 · OtherGoals for Girls Inc — $300,000 · Recreation & SportsYUWA INC — $110,000 · Youth DevelopmentNURTURING NATIONS — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentKEN GARFF FOR GOOD — $20,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$8,349,755International$3,283,703Community Improvement$972,932Education$900,100Other$915,193Recreation & Sports$300,000Youth Development$180,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHope for Justice Inc — $8,088,483 over 5y, 87% of budgetSegner Ministries Inc Healing Faith Uganda — $1,093,110 over 2y, 86% of budgetROOTS CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL — $870,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetSOLE HOPE INC — $820,014 over 4y, 31% of budgetGIVV HUB — $538,917 over 5y, 97% of budgetHEART OF AMERICA FOUNDATION — $412,490 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetFOUNDATION ESCALERA INC — $410,550 over 5y, 19% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $225,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC — $210,424 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP-AFGHANISTAN INC — $200,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSEED PROGRAMS INC — $165,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetFREE YEZIDI FOUNDATION USA INCORPORATED — $150,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetWHOLIVES INC — $126,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetYUWA INC — $110,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetENGAGE NOW AFRICA INC — $105,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetICONNECT OUTREACH INC — $53,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetNURTURING NATIONS — $50,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetWine to Water — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican Friends of Un Techo Para Mi Pais Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetPREVENT CHILD ABUSE UTAH — $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMothers Without Borders — $45,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetVETERANS PATH INC — $40,609 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetHOPE WORLDWIDE UTAH — $40,004 over 1y, 17% of budgetGRANGOU — $27,855 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetFAR AWAY FRIENDS INC — $21,525 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetMITCHELL AREA SAFEHOUSE INC — $20,170 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetRESILIENT RETREAT INC — $20,002 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGARDEN GATE RANCH INC — $20,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetKEN GARFF FOR GOOD — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JUSTICE REFORM — $20,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetKENYA KEYS — $15,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFOSTER KIDS KC — $10,550 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWigs For Kids Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetROGER WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPEFULL HANDBAGS GLOBAL INC — $9,912 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetGranite Education Foundation — $5,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy Found…doTERRA Healing Hands…RLC Family FoundationPROG Holdings Foundat…Larry H Miller and Ga…The Community Foundat…American Express Foun…American Endowment Fo…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Silicon Valley Commun…AbbVie FoundationPaypal Charitable Giv…
Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation · RLC Family Foundation · PROG Holdings Foundation Inc · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · American Express Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Young Living Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Resilient Retreat Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines