Skip to content

· Private foundation

You Got This Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2019
27
Grants FY2019
6
States reached
$8k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

59% of You Got This Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Jewish Federation Of Southern Arizona, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 8 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year You Got This Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 24 organizations, $41k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’17
12
’18
24
’19
2
’20
3
’21
4
’22
3
’23
2
’24
8
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$148kHealth$62kReligion$30kFood & Nutrition$28kArts & Culture$6kEnvironment$3kAnimals$3kPublic Benefit$3kOther$0
02FY2019 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
6
States reached
$94k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$7,500
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA$6,000
ROSE PETAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC$5,000
VISION CHURCH$3,500
CONGREGATION OR CHADESH$3,500
IZI AZI FOUNDATION$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$2,518
NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY$1,500
GOSPEL RESCUE MISSION$1,000
IRONWOOD TREE EXPERIENCE$1,000
TUCSON CANCER CONQUERORS$1,000
ARIZONA ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION$1,000
FOLDED FLAG FOUNDATION INC$1,000
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC$500
CASA DE LOS NINOS INC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GABRIEL'S ANGELS: $200 → 11%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $500 → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $500 → 15%ANGEL CHARITY FOR CHILDREN INC: $300 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MA
NV
PA
CA
AZ
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of You Got This Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

You Got This Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$121k · 16 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +115% since the first grant, against +47% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2019, 3 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
6

Total granted

$121k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+115%
+47%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FELICIA'S FARM FKA IZI AZI FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2025 · $27k · revenue +30%
  • AF
    ARIZONA FOUNDATION FOR CANCER
    5× · 2019–2025 · $10k · revenue +549%
  • TC
    TUCSON CANCER CONQUERORS INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $9k · revenue +115%

Funded once

  • MA
    MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • TP
    The Primavera Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue +47%
  • BC
    BLAIR CHARITY GROUP
    one grant, 2018 · $300
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health
2
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
3
Arizona Cancer Foundation for Children Inc

Arizona Cancer Foundation for Children provides social, emotional, and financial support to families managing the health and well-being of a loved one with pediatric cancer.

Public Benefit
4
Yavapai Big Brothers Big Sisters Foundation
—
5
La Paloma Family Services Inc

We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.

—
6
Arizona Healthiest State Foundation
—
7
The Dons of Arizona
Education
8
Foster 360

Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.

Human Services
9
Impact of Southern Arizona

Impact of southern arizona is a private non-profit volunteer based organization which empowers southern arizonans with the resources required to pursue a stabilized and enhanced quality of life.

Community Improvement
10
Alisas Angels Foundation

To inspire tomorrow's leaders by providing scholarships that support and empower students giving back to their communities.

Education
11
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
12
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa De Los Ninos; the most unlike its peers is Beyond a Mentor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $144,800 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $25,200 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYVISION CHURCH: $14,500 · OtherVISION CHURCHCONGREGATION OR CHADASH: $8,000 · OtherCONGREGATION OR CHADASHNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $7,550 · OtherNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INCUTMD ANDERSON: $6,036 · OtherUTMD ANDERSONTUCSON TORAH CENTER: $5,018 · OtherTUCSON TORAH CENTERROSE PETAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · OtherROSE PETAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · Other+22 more: $15,500 · Other+22 moreFELICIA'S FARM FKA IZI AZI FOUNDATION: $26,800 · Food & NutritionFELICIA'S …Community Food Bank Inc: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $100 · Food & NutritionARIZONA FOUNDATION FOR CANCER: $10,000 · HealthTUCSON CANCER CONQUERORS INC: $9,400 · Health+4 more: $700 · HealthYOUTH OUTDOOR EXPERIENCE: $2,800 · EnvironmentTHE FOLDED FLAG FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Public BenefitYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $1,000 · Human ServicesAngel Charity for Children Inc: $300 · Human ServicesGABRIELS ANGELS INC: $200 · Human Services
Philanthropy$145,800Other$89,804Food & Nutrition$27,900Health$20,100Environment$2,800Public Benefit$2,500Human Services$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $144,800 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetFELICIA'S FARM FKA IZI AZI FOUNDATION: $26,800 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetARIZONA FOUNDATION FOR CANCER: $10,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetTUCSON CANCER CONQUERORS INC: $9,400 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $7,550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH OUTDOOR EXPERIENCE: $2,800 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FOLDED FLAG FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTucson Conquistadores Inc: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWINERS & DINERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Primavera Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA DE LOS NINOS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAngel Charity for Children Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBag It: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCasas Adobes Rotary Club Foundation: $200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGABRIELS ANGELS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBeyond A Mentor: $200 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INCORPORATED: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEADS OF COURAGE INC DBA CENTER FOR ARTS IN NURSING: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE MEALS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HAVEN: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds FELICIA'S FARM FKA IZI AZI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA FOUNDATION FOR CANCER ↗
  • Who funds TUCSON CANCER CONQUERORS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH OUTDOOR EXPERIENCE ↗
  • Who funds THE FOLDED FLAG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Tucson Conquistadores Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH ON THEIR OWN ↗
  • Who funds WINERS & DINERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Primavera Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CASA DE LOS NINOS ↗
  • Who funds Angel Charity for Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds Bag It ↗
  • Who funds FOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Casas Adobes Rotary Club Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GABRIELS ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds Beyond A Mentor ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ37.6× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Fred & Christine Armstrong Foundation · Ashton Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · The Roy H Rogers Foundation Trust · Lapan Memorial Sunshine Foundation Inc · AWH FOUNDATION co ROBERT W GILLETT · Ginny L Clements Charitable Trust · Frederick Gardner Cottrell Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization You Got This Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from You Got This Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on You Got This’ filings →

    More from the funding graph