Skip to content
YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas Inc

To put christian values into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.

$305k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$49k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$3.4MYouth Development$60kInternational$49kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kEducation$12k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $74,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $305,176 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $231,176 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$49,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$211M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA of the USA$49,000
YMCA of Greater San Antonio$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $768k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YMCA of the Golden Crescent: $10k → 16%YMCA of Greater Houston: $25k → 16%YMCA of Corpus Christi: $5k → 17%YMCA of Port Arthur: $10k → 19%YMCA Blue Ridge Assembly: $84k → 12%YMCA of the USA: $49k → 14%Sioux YMCA: $3k → 39%Texas Alliance of YMCAs: $520k → 14%YMCA Blue Ridge Assembly: $7k → 12%YMCA of the USA: $28k → 14%YMCA Blue Ridge Assembly: $7k → 12%YMCA of the USA: $5k → 14%YMCA Blue Ridge Assembly: $7k → 12%YMCA of the USA: $4k → 14%YMCA BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 4 repeat orgs$635k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$2.9M
$610k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+20%

Still filing today

100%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $2.6M · revenue +192% · 38% of their budget
  • YB
    YMCA BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $110k · revenue -25%
  • National Council of YMCAs of the USA
    4× · 2017–2025 · $86k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • TA
    Texas Alliance of YMCAs
    one grant, 2023 · $520k · revenue -45% · 63% of their budget
  • YO
    YMCA of Greenville
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • YM
    Young Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Oklahoma City

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
2
Young Men's Christian Association of Pierce and Kitsap Counties

The mission of the YMCA is to put Christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all. We are an inclusive organization, serving all people regardless of background, religion, beliefs,…

Human Services
3
Young Men's Christian Association of Central New Mexico

The mission of the ymca of central new mexico is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build a healthy spirit, mind and body for all. for over 100 years, the ymca of central new mexico has served our community…

—
4
Young Men's Christian Association of Brainerd

The mission of the brainerd family ymca is to enhance the lives in the brainerd lakes area by connecting individuals and families with opportunities based on christian values that build a healthy spirit, mind, & body.

Human Services
5
Young Men's Christian Association of the Virginia Peninsulas

Our mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. our focus is on youth development, healthy living and social responsibility. we help kids succeed, prepare teens…

Human Services
6
The Young Mens Christian Association of Greater Des Moines

The y's programs focus on improving people's spiritual, intellectual, and physical well-being to support people as they actualize their fullest potential. the ymca serves community members of all abilities, ages, cultural backgrounds,…

—
7
Young Mens Christian Assoc of the Treasure Coast Inc

Community can only be achieved when we invest in our kids, our health and our neighbors well-being. financial assistance is available to any person who cannot afford to pay the full price for any ymca program or membership. all ymca…

Human Services
8
Lake County Young Men's Christian Association

The mission of the lake county ymca is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
9
The Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Tulsa

See schedule othe mission of the ymca of greater tulsa is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. the ymca of greater tulsa is a powerful association of men, women and…

Human Services
10
Ymca of San Diego County

The ymca of san diego county is a nonprofit with a mission to nurture a healthy spirit, mind, and body so all can thrive while honoring our faith-based heritage.

Human Services
11
Young Men's Christian Association of Grant County Inc

The ymca's mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
12
Cleveland County Family Young Men's Christian Association Inc

The mission of the ymca is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. the y mission is also to advance our cause of strengthening community through youth development,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Men's Christian Association of Southeast Texas; the most unlike its peers is Trey Athletes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS FOUNDATION INC: $2,642,857 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $59,604 · Youth DevelopmentTexas Alliance of YMCAs: $520,169 · Human ServicesTexas Alliance of YMCAsYMCA BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY INC: $109,760 · Human ServicesYMCA BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY…National Council of YMCAs of the USA: $85,513 · Human ServicesNational Council of YMCA…+5 more: $52,500 · Human Services+5 moreYMCA of Greenville: $25,100 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO: $25,000 · OtherPARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $12,000 · Other
Youth Development$2,702,461Human Services$767,942Other$62,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS FOUNDATION INC: $2,642,857 over 5y, 38% of budgetTexas Alliance of YMCAs: $520,169 over 1y, 63% of budgetYMCA BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY INC: $109,760 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetNational Council of YMCAs of the USA: $85,513 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTREY ATHLETES: $59,604 over 2y, 19% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYMCA of the Coastal Bend: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSIOUX YMCA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Council of Y…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Council of YMCAs of the USAIL17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Council of YMCAs of the USA · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home