Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas Inc

To put christian values into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.

$305k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$49k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$3.4MYouth Development$60kInternational$49kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kEducation$12k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $74,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $305,176 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $231,176 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$49,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$211M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA of the USA$49,000
YMCA of Greater San Antonio$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $768k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YMCA of the Golden Crescent: $10k → 16%YMCA of Greater Houston: $25k → 16%YMCA of Corpus Christi: $5k → 17%YMCA of Port Arthur: $10k → 19%YMCA Blue Ridge Assembly: $84k → 12%YMCA of the USA: $49k → 14%Sioux YMCA: $3k → 39%Texas Alliance of YMCAs: $520k → 14%YMCA Blue Ridge Assembly: $7k → 12%YMCA of the USA: $28k → 14%YMCA Blue Ridge Assembly: $7k → 12%YMCA of the USA: $5k → 14%YMCA BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY: $7k → 12%YMCA of the USA: $4k → 14%YMCA Blue Ridge Assembly: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 4 repeat orgs$635k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$2.9M
$610k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+20%

Still filing today

100%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $2.6M · revenue +192% · 38% of their budget
  • YB
    YMCA BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $110k · revenue -25%
  • National Council of YMCAs of the USA
    4× · 2017–2025 · $86k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • TA
    Texas Alliance of YMCAs
    one grant, 2023 · $520k · revenue -45% · 63% of their budget
  • YO
    YMCA of Greenville
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • YM
    Young Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -12%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Oklahoma City

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
2
Young Men's Christian Association of Central New Mexico

The mission of the ymca of central new mexico is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build a healthy spirit, mind and body for all. for over 100 years, the ymca of central new mexico has served our community…

3
Young Men's Christian Association of Pierce and Kitsap Counties

The mission of the YMCA is to put Christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all. We are an inclusive organization, serving all people regardless of background, religion, beliefs,…

Human Services
4
Young Men's Christian Association of Brainerd

The mission of the brainerd family ymca is to enhance the lives in the brainerd lakes area by connecting individuals and families with opportunities based on christian values that build a healthy spirit, mind, & body.

Human Services
5
Young Men's Christian Association

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
6
The Young Mens Christian Association of Greater Des Moines

The y's programs focus on improving people's spiritual, intellectual, and physical well-being to support people as they actualize their fullest potential. the ymca serves community members of all abilities, ages, cultural backgrounds,…

7
Young Men's Christian Association of the Virginia Peninsulas

Our mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. our focus is on youth development, healthy living and social responsibility. we help kids succeed, prepare teens…

Human Services
8
Young Men's Christian Association of Austin Minnesota

We work side-by-side with our neighbors to make sure that everyone, regardless of age, income or background, has the opportunity to learn, grow and thrive.

9
The Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Tulsa

See schedule othe mission of the ymca of greater tulsa is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. the ymca of greater tulsa is a powerful association of men, women and…

Human Services
10
Young Mens Christian Assoc of the Treasure Coast Inc

Community can only be achieved when we invest in our kids, our health and our neighbors well-being. financial assistance is available to any person who cannot afford to pay the full price for any ymca program or membership. all ymca…

Human Services
11
Young Men's Christian Association

We build strong kids, strong families, and strong communities with a primary focus on youth activities and programs.

Human Services
12
Young Men's Christian Association of Grant County Inc

The ymca's mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Men's Christian Association of Southeast Texas and the most unlike its peers is Trey Athletes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS FOUNDATION INC — $2,642,857 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS FOUNDATION INC+1 more — $59,604 · Youth DevelopmentTexas Alliance of YMCAs — $520,169 · Human ServicesTexas Alliance of YMCAsYMCA BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY INC — $109,760 · Human ServicesYMCA BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY…National Council of YMCAs of the USA — $85,513 · Human ServicesNational Council of YMCA…+5 more — $52,500 · Human Services+5 moreYMCA of Greenville — $25,100 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO — $25,000 · OtherPARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL — $12,000 · Other
Youth Development$2,702,461Human Services$767,942Other$62,100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS FOUNDATION INC — $2,642,857 over 5y, 38% of budgetTexas Alliance of YMCAs — $520,169 over 1y, 63% of budgetYMCA BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY INC — $109,760 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetNational Council of YMCAs of the USA — $85,513 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTREY ATHLETES — $59,604 over 2y, 19% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL — $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYMCA of the Coastal Bend — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSIOUX YMCA — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Council of YMCAs of the USAIL17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Council of YMCAs of the USA · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph