Skip to content
Yetadel Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Yetadel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$130kEducation$71kEnvironment$44kHealth$31kScience & Tech$27kInternational$6kFood & Nutrition$5kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $38k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$58k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ENRICHING LIVES THROUGH MUSIC$15,000
CENTRO DEL MAR DE IDIOMAS$13,413
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY$10,000
EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE$5,000
SIGNAL TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION$5,000
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 84% of grant dollars ($295k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 16% that went abroad ($57k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AZ COLLEGE OF NURSING: $20k → 11%UNIV OF AZ FOUNDATION: $4k → 15%UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS: $2k → 8%SIGNAL TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%AMAZON WATCH: $3k → 10%CAMPAIGN FOR FEMALE EDUCATON: $1k → 10%CLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND: $3k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $5k → 17%EXTINCTION REBELLION: $5k → 14%AZ COLLEGE OF NURSING: $11k → 11%UNIV OF AZ FOUNDATION: $4k → 15%UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS: $2k → 8%NAT'L CENTER FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION: $3k → 10%KRONOS: $5k → 10%URBAN JUSTICE CENTER: $1k → 17%SOCIETY FOR SCIENCE: $1k → 14%GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY: $26k → 11%AZ PUBLIC MEDIA - KUAT: $2k → 15%UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS: $2k → 8%NAT'L CENTER FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION: $3k → 10%KRONOS: $5k → 10%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $500 → 17%SOCIETY FOR SCIENCE: $1k → 14%GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY: $26k → 11%AZ PUBLIC MEDIA - KUAT: $2k → 15%UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS: $2k → 8%NAT'L CENTER FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION: $3k → 10%KRONOS: $5k → 10%SOCIETY FOR SCIENCE: $1k → 14%AZ PUBLIC MEDIA - KUAT: $2k → 15%NAT'L CENTER FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION: $3k → 10%KRONOS: $1k → 10%SOCIETY FOR SCIENCE: $1k → 14%INSTITUTE FOR BETTER EDUCATION: $500 → 15%EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE: $10k → 10%KRONOS: $1k → 10%EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE: $5k → 10%WOMENS EARTH ALLIANCE INSTITUTE: $5k → 10%EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE: $5k → 10%EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE: $3k → 10%EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE: $2k → 10%EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE: $1k → 10%EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE: $1k → 10%BERKELEY FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
CA
AZ
TN
DC
GA

Beyond the US: 16% of all-years giving ($57k)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Spain$51k · 5 grants
United Kingdom$5k · 1 grant
Fiji$781 · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$299k · 13 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +92% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
13

Total granted

$299k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+92%
+8%

Still filing today

62%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentScience & TechInternationalArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EL
    Enriching Lives Through Music
    9× · 2017–2025 · $78k · revenue ×26
  • GC
    Grand Canyon University
    2× · 2023–2024 · $52k · revenue +19%
  • Earth Island Institute Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $27k · revenue +271%

Funded once

  • WE
    WOMENS EARTH ALLIANCE INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • BF
    BERKELEY FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • ER
    EXTINCTION REBELLION
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
2
The Breakthrough Institute

The Breakthrough Institute is a research center that identifies and promotes technological solutions to environmental and human development challenges.

Environment
3
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
4
Electronic Privacy Information Center

Epic's mission is to secure the fundamental right to privacy in the digital age for all people through advocacy, research, and litigation.

Civil Rights
5
American Society of Civil Engineers Inc

To provide essential value to our members, their careers, our partners, and the public, asce will: facilitate the advancement of technology; encourage and provide the tools for lifelong learning; promote professionalism and the profession;…

Science & Tech
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
8
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
9
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
10
International Council On Environmental Economics and Development Union
Human Services
11
Ie New York College

(see schedule o)

Education
12
International Life Sciences Institute

Ilsi is a global, nonprofit federation dedicated to generating and advancing emerging science and groundbreaking research to ensure foods are safe, nutritious and sustainable, and that they improve planetary and human health and well-being…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc; the most unlike its peers is Foundational Questions Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRO DEL MAR DE IDIOMAS: $51,013 · OtherCENTRO DEL MAR DE IDIOMASAZ COLLEGE OF NURSING: $31,000 · OtherAZ COLLEGE OF NURSINGKRONOS: $17,000 · OtherKRONOSUNIV OF AZ FOUNDATION: $8,000 · OtherUNIV OF AZ FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherWOMENS EARTH ALLIANCE INSTITUTE: $5,000 · OtherBERKELEY FOOD PANTRY: $5,000 · OtherEXTINCTION REBELLION: $5,000 · OtherElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,766 · Other+5 more: $4,781 · OtherEnriching Lives Through Music: $78,000 · Arts & CultureEnriching Lives Through M…Grand Canyon University: $51,900 · EducationGrand Canyon Univers…Vanderbilt University: $10,000 · EducationVanderbilt Universit…+2 more: $2,000 · EducationEarth Island Institute Inc: $27,000 · EnvironmentEarth Isla…Amazon Watch Inc: $3,000 · EnvironmentAmazon Wat…CLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND: $2,500 · EnvironmentCLIMATE EM…National Center for Science Education: $10,000 · Science & TechSOCIETY FOR SCIENCE & THE PUBLIC: $4,000 · Science & TechTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $8,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,500 · InternationalSIGNAL TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Community ImprovementFOUNDATIONAL QUESTIONS INSTITUTE: $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$142,560Arts & Culture$78,000Education$63,900Environment$32,500Science & Tech$14,000International$13,500Community Improvement$5,000Philanthropy$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEnriching Lives Through Music: $78,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetGrand Canyon University: $51,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $27,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNational Center for Science Education: $10,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetVanderbilt University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR SCIENCE & THE PUBLIC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmazon Watch Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATIONAL QUESTIONS INSTITUTE: $2,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetURBAN JUSTICE CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF ARIZONA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInstitute for Better Education: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase Founda…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY11.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yetadel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yetadel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Yetadel Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Yetadel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Yetadel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home