· Private foundation
Yes Ben Dovid Foundation Inc
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k2 grants · $7k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $76k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONGREGATION BNEI KEDOSHIM | $75,600 |
| CONGREGATION BETH MEDROSH OF MONSEY | $17,900 |
| YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL OF CLEVELAND | $3,300 |
| KOLLEL MORASHA KEHILAS YAAKOV | $3,300 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
67 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2020, 63 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- CCCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION3× · 2017–2019 · $60k · revenue +34%
- TATHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC2× · 2018–2019 · $46k · revenue +53%
- YOYESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC2× · 2017–2019 · $7k · revenue +157%
Funded once
- M1MISCELLANEOUS 1000one grant, 2017 · $324k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $185k
- MHMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $120k · revenue +37%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
Religious Teaching
Religious School
Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students
Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…
Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.
To conduct and maintain a religious school in accordance with the tenets, traditions and precepts of the orthodox jewish faith.
Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith
Provide a building for a religious school.
To provide religious Jewish education.
How this is measured
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 329 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donors Fund Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · The Fishoff Family Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · The Sorala Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Yes Ben Dovid Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yes Ben Dovid Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc: 28% of income from government
- Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh Inc: 9% of income from government
- Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc: 5% of income from government
- The Special Children Center: 5% of income from government
- Tashbar of Lakewood Inc: 4% of income from government
- Yeshiva Gedolah Keren Hatorah Inc: 1% of income from government
- Mesorah Heritage Foundation: 1% of income from government
- The Aleph Institute Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Yes Ben Dovid’s filings →