· Public charity
Wyoming County Community Health Fou
The Wyoming County Community Health Foundation identifies, selects, and invests in programs and Organizations that will improve the health and wellness of people in Wyoming County and surrounding communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $213,332 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $239,334 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $26,002 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $170k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Meshoppen Fire Company | $63,333 |
| Tunkhannock Community Ambulance Ass | $53,333 |
| Kunkle Fire Company | $53,333 |
| Northern Tier Industry and Educatio | $30,000 |
| FWM Emergency Squad Inc | $13,333 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against -15% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $160k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TTTHE TUNKHANNOCK COMMUNITY AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC2× · 2023–2025 · $82k · revenue +78%
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2018–2019 · $50k
- WCWyoming County EMS Consortium2× · 2021–2024 · $22k
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $25k
- CHCHILD HUNGER OUTREACH PARTNERSgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +53%
- NTNORTHERN TIER INDUSTRY & EDUCATIONone grant, 2017 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide Fire Prevention & Protection Services
Volunteer fire department
All volunteer fire department provides fire and rescue services to the surrounding communities.
To provide protection and emergency medical services to residents of north wales borough, lower gwynedd township, upper gwynedd township and surrounding communities.
Provider of Emergency Ambulance Services
The Tidioute Volunteer Fire Department provides both fire and ambulance response services in the area of Tidioute, Pennsylvania.
Provide fire protection and rescue services to the community
The gordon's corner fire company was established for the prtection of life and property, as well as the prevention and extinguishment of fires along with the specializaations in technical rescue for the residents of fire district 1 in the…
To provide fire and emergency services to community
Volunteer fire fighting
Volunteer Fire Company
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meshoppen Volunteer Fire Company and the most unlike its peers is Child Hunger Outreach Partners. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE TUNKHANNOCK COMMUNITY AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds MESHOPPEN VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds Kunkle Fire Company Inc ↗
- Who funds Northern Tier Industry and Education Consortium In ↗
- Who funds WYOMING COUNTY COMMUNITY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds FWM EMERGENCY SQUAD INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD HUNGER OUTREACH PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds TRITON HOSE COMPANY OF TUNKHANNOCK NO 1 ↗
- Who funds RURAL HEALTH CORPORATION OF NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds HANDS OF WYOMING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds FACTORYVILLE FIRE COMPANY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wyoming County United Way Inc · Moses Taylor Foundation Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wyoming County Community Health Fou funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.