Skip to content
Wyoming County Community Health Fou at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Wyoming County Community Health Fou

The Wyoming County Community Health Foundation identifies, selects, and invests in programs and Organizations that will improve the health and wellness of people in Wyoming County and surrounding communities.

$239k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$250kEmployment$65kHealth$64kFood & Nutrition$19kHuman Services$8kYouth Development$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $213,332, the rows itemized in this filing. The $239,334 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $26,002 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $170k
$53,333
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Meshoppen Fire Company$63,333
Tunkhannock Community Ambulance Ass$53,333
Kunkle Fire Company$53,333
Northern Tier Industry and Educatio$30,000
FWM Emergency Squad Inc$13,333
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Hands of Wyoming County: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$167k · 4 repeat orgs$244k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$167k
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
0%

Still filing today

50%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $160k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Public Safety & DisasterHealthFood & NutritionEmploymentHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    THE TUNKHANNOCK COMMUNITY AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $82k · revenue +78%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2018–2019 · $50k
  • WC
    Wyoming County EMS Consortium
    2× · 2021–2024 · $22k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • CH
    CHILD HUNGER OUTREACH PARTNERSgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +53%
  • NT
    NORTHERN TIER INDUSTRY & EDUCATION
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Duncannon Fire Company No 1 Inc

Provide Fire Prevention & Protection Services

—
2
Tunxis Hose Company No 1 Inc

Volunteer fire department

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Penn Volunteer Fire Department

All volunteer fire department provides fire and rescue services to the surrounding communities.

—
4
North Penn Volunteer Fire Company

To provide protection and emergency medical services to residents of north wales borough, lower gwynedd township, upper gwynedd township and surrounding communities.

—
5
Tamaqua Community Ambulance

Provider of Emergency Ambulance Services

Health
6
Tidioute Volunteer Fire Department

The Tidioute Volunteer Fire Department provides both fire and ambulance response services in the area of Tidioute, Pennsylvania.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Wilpen Fire Co of Ligonier Township

Provide fire protection and rescue services to the community

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Gordons Corner Fire Company

The gordon's corner fire company was established for the prtection of life and property, as well as the prevention and extinguishment of fires along with the specializaations in technical rescue for the residents of fire district 1 in the…

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Summerhill Township Volunteer Fire Co

To provide fire and emergency services to community

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Tullytown Fire Company

Volunteer fire fighting

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Taylor Township Volunteer Fire Department
—
12
North Franklin Township Volunteer Fire Company

Volunteer Fire Company

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meshoppen Volunteer Fire Company; the most unlike its peers is Child Hunger Outreach Partners. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE TUNKHANNOCK COMMUNITY AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC: $81,673 · OtherTHE TUNKHANNOCK COMMUNITY AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INCMESHOPPEN VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY: $63,333 · OtherMESHOPPEN VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANYIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWyoming County EMS Consortium: $22,062 · OtherWyoming County EMS ConsortiumNORTHERN TIER INDUSTRY & EDUCATION: $10,000 · OtherTRITON HOSE COMPANY OF TUNKHANNOCK NO 1: $9,998 · Other+1 more: $6,491 · OtherKunkle Fire Company Inc: $53,333 · Public Safety & DisasterKunkle Fire Comp…FACTORYVILLE FIRE COMPANY: $6,000 · Public Safety & DisasterFACTORYVILLE FIR…Northern Tier Industry and Education Consortium In: $30,000 · EmploymentFWM EMERGENCY SQUAD INC: $13,333 · HealthRURAL HEALTH CORPORATION OF NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $7,500 · HealthWYOMING COUNTY COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $13,700 · Community ImprovementCHILD HUNGER OUTREACH PARTNERS: $12,000 · Food & NutritionHANDS OF WYOMING COUNTY: $7,500 · Human Services
Other$268,557Public Safety & Disaster$59,333Employment$30,000Health$20,833Community Improvement$13,700Food & Nutrition$12,000Human Services$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TUNKHANNOCK COMMUNITY AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC: $81,673 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetNorthern Tier Industry and Education Consortium In: $30,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetWYOMING COUNTY COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $13,700 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetFWM EMERGENCY SQUAD INC: $13,333 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetCHILD HUNGER OUTREACH PARTNERS: $12,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTRITON HOSE COMPANY OF TUNKHANNOCK NO 1: $9,998 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetRURAL HEALTH CORPORATION OF NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHANDS OF WYOMING COUNTY: $7,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFACTORYVILLE FIRE COMPANY: $6,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wyoming County United…Moses Taylor Foundati…Tulsa Community Found…Amazonsmile Foundation
Wyoming County United Way IncPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wyoming County United Way Inc · Moses Taylor Foundation Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wyoming County Community Health Fou funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wyoming County Community Health Fou. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wyoming County Community Health Fou’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home