· Private foundation
Wy Campbell Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k26 grants · $77k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $33k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTHY START | $12,500 |
| CLEVELAND CLINIC INDIAN RIVER FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY & MEDICINE-ROBERT PACKARD CENTER FOR ALS RESEARCH | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| WHOLE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER | $5,000 |
| ANGELMAN SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH & INDIAN RIVER COUNTY | $4,000 |
| UNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOL | $4,000 |
| PUPPIES BEHIND BARS | $4,000 |
| QUAIL VALLEY CHARITIES INC | $3,600 |
| SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION | $3,000 |
| UNITED AGAINST POVERTY OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY | $3,000 |
| DEPRESSION AND BIPOLAR SUPPORT ALLIANCE | $3,000 |
| LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY HUMANE SOCIETY | $3,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IRINDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTHY START COALITION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $63k · revenue +154%
- PBPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +29%
- WFWHOLE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC4× · 2022–2025 · $20k · revenue +80%
Funded once
- AAAmerican Association for Cancer Research Incone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +10%
- MSMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTERone grant, 2023 · $6k
- FHFARBER HEBREW DAY SCHOOL-YESHIVAL AKIVAone grant, 2024 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Enhance the patient and family experience at upper valley medical center by raising community support for programs and services which help build healthy communities.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
To provide guidelines and certification for those hospitals and surgeons who practice surgery.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health Assn in Irc Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Kidney Foundation of Michigan Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTHY START COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC ↗
- Who funds WHOLE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ANGELMAN SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds VETERANS COUNCIL OF INDIAN RIVER CO ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH AND INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds JOHN'S ISLAND COMMUNITY SERVICE LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSN IN IRC INC ↗
- Who funds Senior Resource Association Inc ↗
- Who funds American Association for Cancer Research Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF INDIAN RIVER INC ↗
- Who funds GREAT LAKES BOAT BUILDING SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds QUAIL VALLEY CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds LES CHENEAUX CULINARY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
- Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Indian River Community Foundation Inc · Archie S Wingfield Jr Charitable Trust U/A/D 5/15/1995 · United Way of Indian River County Inc · The John's Island Foundation Inc · John's Island Community Service League Inc · Minotty Family Foundation · Jake Owen Foundation · The Carwill Foundation · The Fairfield Foundation · Quail Valley Charities Inc · The Kahle Foundation Inc · Bernard a Egan Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wy Campbell Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Indian River Land Trust Inc — 0% of income from government
- Whole Family Health Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.