· Private foundation
Ww and Anne Jones Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k17 grants · $75k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $113k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $27,500 |
| CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $20,000 |
| ARKANSAS FOOD BANK | $15,000 |
| CJ COHN | $10,000 |
| SALINE COUNTY BOYS AND | $10,000 |
| FIRST UNITED METHODIST | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| ARKANSAS REPERTORY THEATER | $10,000 |
| SALINE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING | $7,500 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY-SALINE CO | $7,500 |
| UNIV OF ARK FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
| AFS USA | $5,000 |
| CIVITAN SERVICE CENTER | $5,000 |
| HENDRIX COLLEGE | $5,000 |
| ROYAL PLAYERS | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFARKANSAS FOODBANK9× · 2017–2025 · $118k · revenue +106%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +122%
- RPROYAL PLAYERS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $47k · revenue +70%
Funded once
- AVARKANSAS VALUES INCone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -8%
THE FOOD DEPOTone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +17%- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Renewing the land of opportunity by simplifying government and solving generational problems for the next generation.
True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.
Advocate for educational professionals and unite our members and the state to fulfill the promise of public education to prepare every student to succeed in a diverse and interdependent world.
Ar public policy panel is a statewide organization dedicated to achieving social and economic justice by organizing citizen groups around the state, educating and supporting them to be more effective and powerful, and linking them with one…
The food bank of northeast arkansas provides hunger relief to people in need in twelve counties in northeast arkansas by raising awareness, securing resources, and distributing food through a network of non-profit agencies and programs.
Arkansas community foundation engages people, connects resources and inspires solutions to build community.
Advocating for the development and implementation of data-driven public policy that improves child well-being in arkansas, with a focus on economic security, education, health, early childhood, child welfare, juvenile justice, and racial…
The purpose of the arkansas humanities council is to promote understanding, appreciation, and use of the humanities in arkansas. to achieve its purpose, the council awards grants through a competitive application process to nonprofit…
To provide legal assistance & housing counseling to the underprivileged citizens of north arkansas.
Promote profession of pharmacy in the state of arkansas.
To promote excellence in health care through evaluation and education
Producing journalism that matters to Arkansans.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arkansas Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Royal Players Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARKANSAS FOODBANK ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS REPERTORY THEATRE ↗
- Who funds AFS-USA INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ROYAL PLAYERS INC ↗
- Who funds HENDRIX COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CAMP ALDERSGATE INC ↗
- Who funds METHODIST FAMILY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds GERARD'S HOUSE ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS VALUES INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Opera Theatre of Saint Louis ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS VALUES INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
- Who funds Arkansas United ↗
- Who funds OPERA AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL ARKANSAS RESCUE EFFORT FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Windgate Charitable Foundation Inc · Rebsamen Fund · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And · Heart of Arkansas United Way · Riggs Benevolent Fund · John R & Judy W Fletcher Family Foundation · Clarence E Anthony Charitable Trust · Brown Foundation · Arvest Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ww and Anne Jones Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.