Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wsm Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$567kRecreation & Sports$236kEducation$165kFood & Nutrition$157kArts & Culture$86kCommunity Improvement$31kHuman Services$5k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $41k
$8,750
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE POWELL COUNTY FOUNDATION$31,375
MISSOULA FOOD BANK$10,000
ALEXANDRIA HOUSE$8,750
KCRW$2,500
NY SHELTER$1,000
Individual grant recipient$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $567k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $503k → 14%ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $37k → 14%ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $17k → 14%ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $9k → 14%ANGEL CITY SPORTS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$928k · 7 repeat orgs$318k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
9

Total granted

$928k
$283k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+26%

Still filing today

71%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    ALEXANDRIA HOUSE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $566k · revenue +12%
  • MF
    MISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER
    4× · 2022–2025 · $45k · revenue +24%
  • SF
    SOULSVILLE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $40k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • ES
    EVERGREEN SKATEPARKS LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $230k
  • TB
    The Bridge School
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +2%
  • AG
    ACTOR'S GANG INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bridge California

Education

Education
2
The Winsor School

Our mission: the winsor school prepares young women to pursue their aspirations and contribute to the world.

Education
3
Masters School

The masters school celebrates active participation, deep understanding, and meaningful connection. a community of diverse individuals, we gather to learn, to strive, to dare, to do - to be a power for good in the world.

—
4
Phillips Exeter Academy

Unite goodness and knowledge and inspire youth from every quarter to lead purposeful lives. [text in quotations is taken from the academy's deed of gift, drafted in 1781] knowledge and goodness "above all, it is expected that the attention…

Education
5
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
6
Hollywood Schoolhouse Inc

Hollywood Schoolhouse knows, values, and encourages fearless curiosity. Through a blended program of innovative academics and structured learning, our diverse community inspires students to be academically strong, artistically proud,…

Education
7
Tulsa School of Arts and Sciences

The mission of tsas middle and high school is to provide students a multi-strand liberal arts education in a safe, supportive, individualized and challenging school environment through a college preparatory curriculum.

Education
8
Ingenuity Prep

Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.

Education
9
Avery Coonley School

The Avery Coonley School elevates high-achieving and gifted learners through immersion in a mutually talented community where intellect, curiosity, and creativity are enhanced by optimal challenge.

—
10
Suffield Academy

Suffield Academy is a coeducational independent secondary school serving a diverse student body of day and boarding students from across the United States and from many foreign counties. The school is grounded in a tradition of academic…

Education
11
The Overlake School

The overlake school champions students and their vast potential through engaging educational experiences in a diverse and inclusive community. students are valued as multifaceted individuals and graduate with a passion for learning, ready…

Education
12
Bridges Academy Inc

Bridges academy is dedicated to understanding and educating gifted and highly gifted students with learning differences (twice-exceptional or 2e students) and fostering a successful academic and social experience for our students and the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Angel City Alliance; the most unlike its peers is Twin Bridges School & Community Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $565,569 · Human ServicesALEXANDRIA HOUSE+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesEVERGREEN SKATEPARKS LLC: $230,000 · OtherEVERGREEN SKATEPARKS LLCDEER LODGE SCHOOLS: $112,190 · OtherDEER LODGE SCHOOLSKCRW MEDIA CENTER: $35,000 · OtherKCRW MEDIA CENTERTHE POWELL COUNTY FOUNDATION: $31,375 · OtherTHE POWELL COUNTY FOUNDATION+7 more: $18,050 · OtherHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $126,300 · EducationHARVARD-WESTLA…The Bridge School: $25,000 · EducationThe Bridge Sch…+1 more: $5,000 · EducationSOULSVILLE FOUNDATION: $40,350 · Arts & CultureACTOR'S GANG INC: $7,656 · Arts & CultureMISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $45,000 · Food & NutritionTwin Bridges School & Community Foundation Inc: $4,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$566,569Other$426,615Education$156,300Arts & Culture$48,006Food & Nutrition$45,000Philanthropy$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $565,569 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $126,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $45,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSOULSVILLE FOUNDATION: $40,350 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetThe Bridge School: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetACTOR'S GANG INC: $7,656 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTwin Bridges School & Community Foundation Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetAngel City Alliance: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALEXANDRIA HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SOULSVILLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Bridge School ↗
  • Who funds ACTOR'S GANG INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Twin Bridges School & Community Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Angel City Alliance ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wsm Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wsm Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wsm’s filings →

    More from the funding graph