Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wrm Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$150kEnvironment$113kEducation$35kFood & Nutrition$35kHuman Services$35kHealth$25kRecreation & Sports$24kCrime & Legal$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $100k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LANE COUNTY DIAPER BANK$25,000
DOWNTIME EMERGENCY SERVICE CENTER$25,000
FRIENDS OF COLUMBIA RIVER GORGE$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
FOOD FOR LANE COUNTY$10,000
RAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK$10,000
HOOD RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%LANE COUNTY DIAPER BANK: $25k → 15%LANE COUNTY DIAPER BANK: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$323k · 8 repeat orgs$167k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$323k
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+108%

Still filing today

63%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CASA FAMILIA INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $60k · revenue +334%
  • DE
    Downtown Emergency Service Center
    3× · 2021–2023 · $55k · revenue +63%
  • Friends of the Columbia Gorge
    2× · 2018–2020 · $30k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • IO
    INTERVENTIONAL ORTHOBIOLOGICS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -26%
  • UP
    UNDERWOOD PARKS AND RECREATION
    one grant, 2020 · $23k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
2
Idaho Foodbank Warehouse

To help feed, educate and advocate for Idaho's hungry through collaborative partnerships to develop efficient solutions that strengthen individuals, families, and communities.

Food & Nutrition
3
Flathead Food Bank Inc

The Flathead Food Bank strives to elimnate hunger in the Flathead Valley through collaborative partnerships creating effective solutions to connect and strengthen individuals, families and the community through access to healthy nutritious…

Food & Nutrition
4
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
5
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
6
Food Lifeline

Food lifeline's mission is to feed people experiencing hunger today while working to end hunger tomorrow.

Food & Nutrition
7
Intermountain End-Stage Renal Disease Network Inc

The mission/vision of Intermountain Quality Innovations (ImQI) is to advance the improvement of healthcare quality provided to people with acute and chronic conditions, including ESRD, through clinical & logistical support,…

—
8
Innovative Housing Inc

Develop, preserve and operate affordable housing for low and moderate- income households and provde services to residents to maintain housing stability, improve quality of life and break the cycle of poverty.

Housing & Shelter
9
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
10
West Seattle Food Bank

West Seattle Food Bank strengthens the community through the power of neighbors helping neighbors, working to ensure all in our community have access to the essential necessities of living.

Food & Nutrition
11
Feeding Washington

Create a strong and effective statewide infrastructure that efficiently leverages resources to expand capacity in Washington State's Feeding America network.

Food & Nutrition
12
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for Lane County; the most unlike its peers is Casa Familia Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF COLUMBIA RIVER GORGE: $75,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF COLUMBIA RIVER GORGEFriends of the Columbia Gorge: $30,000 · OtherFriends of the Columbia GorgeRAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK: $25,000 · OtherRAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANKDOWNTIME EMERGENCY SERVICE CENTER: $25,000 · OtherDOWNTIME EMERGENCY SERVICE CENTERUNDERWOOD PARKS AND RECREATION: $23,335 · OtherUNDERWOOD PARKS AND RECREATIONSKAMANIA COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT ASS: $22,877 · OtherSKAMANIA COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOOD RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT: $20,000 · OtherHOOD RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICTIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherLOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTE: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherFOOD FOR LANE COUNTY: $10,000 · Other+2 more: $8,500 · OtherDowntown Emergency Service Center: $55,000 · HealthDowntown Emergency…INTERVENTIONAL ORTHOBIOLOGICS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthINTERVENTIONAL ORT…CASA FAMILIA INC: $60,000 · Housing & ShelterCASA FAMILIA …Lane County Diaper Bank: $35,000 · Human ServicesLane Count…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 · Human ServicesAmerican N…Transponder: $10,000 · Civil Rights
Other$294,712Health$80,000Housing & Shelter$60,000Human Services$45,000Civil Rights$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCASA FAMILIA INC: $60,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetDowntown Emergency Service Center: $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLane County Diaper Bank: $35,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetFriends of the Columbia Gorge: $30,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetINTERVENTIONAL ORTHOBIOLOGICS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetRAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK: $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTransponder: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR LANE COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CASA FAMILIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Downtown Emergency Service Center ↗
  • Who funds Lane County Diaper Bank ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Columbia Gorge ↗
  • Who funds INTERVENTIONAL ORTHOBIOLOGICS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds LOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Transponder ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR LANE COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL12× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wrm Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wrm Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 58%
  • Transponder: 58% of income from government
  • Casa Familia Inc: 53% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wrm Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Wrm Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wrm Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph