Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Wrm Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Housing & Shelter$150kEnvironment$113kEducation$35kFood & Nutrition$35kHuman Services$35kHealth$25kRecreation & Sports$24kCrime & Legal$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOWNTIME EMERGENCY SERVICE CENTER$25,000
LANE COUNTY DIAPER BANK$25,000
RAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK$20,000
HOOD RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT$20,000
FRIENDS OF COLUMBIA RIVER GORGE$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%LANE COUNTY DIAPER BANK: $25k → 15%LANE COUNTY DIAPER BANK: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$348k · 8 repeat orgs$142k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$348k
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+108%

Still filing today

63%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CASA FAMILIA INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $60k · revenue +334%
  • DE
    Downtown Emergency Service Center
    3× · 2021–2023 · $55k · revenue +63%
  • Friends of the Columbia Gorge
    2× · 2018–2020 · $30k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • IO
    INTERVENTIONAL ORTHOBIOLOGICS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -26%
  • UP
    UNDERWOOD PARKS AND RECREATION
    one grant, 2020 · $23k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Intermountain End-Stage Renal Disease Network Inc

The mission/vision of Intermountain Quality Innovations (ImQI) is to advance the improvement of healthcare quality provided to people with acute and chronic conditions, including ESRD, through clinical & logistical support,…

2
Innovative Housing Inc

Develop, preserve and operate affordable housing for low and moderate- income households and provde services to residents to maintain housing stability, improve quality of life and break the cycle of poverty.

Housing & Shelter
3
Idaho Foodbank Warehouse

To help feed, educate and advocate for Idaho's hungry through collaborative partnerships to develop efficient solutions that strengthen individuals, families, and communities.

Food & Nutrition
4
House Our Neighbors

House Our Neighbors envisions a future where all people can afford to live and thrive in vibrant, cohesive, and climate resilient communities. To achieve this, we develop, advocate, and mobilize for policy to realize social housing for the…

5
Disability Rights Washington

Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.

Human Services
6
Disability Rights Idaho Inc

The organization protects, promotes and advances the legal and human rights of individuals with disabilities, through quality legal, individual, and system advocacy.

7
Fair Housing Council of Oregon

FHCO is a statewide civil rights organization whose mission is to end illegal housing discrimination and promote equal access to housing choice through education and enforcement of fair housing law.

Unclassified
8
LArche Portland

At l'arche portland people with and without developmental disabilities create home and build community together. we nurture long-term mutual relationships that reveal the gifts of people with developmental disabilities. in doing so we…

Human Services
9
The Immigrant and Refugee Community Organization

The immigrant and refugee community organization (irco) is a community based nonprofit organization established to welcome, serve and empower refugees, immigrants, and people across cultures and generations to reach their full potential.…

10
Idaho Health Data Exchange Inc

IHDE exists to create and maintain a collaborative statewide effort to improve the coordination and quality of healthcare through the use of a health information exchange and health information technology.

Health
11
Office of Rural and Farmworker Housing

Improving the lives of farmworkers and low-income individuals in rural communities through affordable housing, advocacy, building financial assets and other innovative solutions.

Housing & Shelter
12
Northwest Fair Housing Alliance

The mission of the Northwest Fair Housing Alliance is to eliminate housing discrimination and to ensure equal housing opportunity for the people of Washington State through education, counseling and advocacy.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Low Income Housing Institute and the most unlike its peers is Casa Familia Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FRIENDS OF COLUMBIA RIVER GORGE — $75,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF COLUMBIA RIVER GORGEHOOD RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT — $35,000 · OtherHOOD RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICTRAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK — $35,000 · OtherRAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANKFriends of the Columbia Gorge — $30,000 · OtherFriends of the Columbia GorgeDOWNTIME EMERGENCY SERVICE CENTER — $25,000 · OtherDOWNTIME EMERGENCY SERVICE CENTERUNDERWOOD PARKS AND RECREATION — $23,335 · OtherUNDERWOOD PARKS AND RECREATIONSKAMANIA COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT ASS — $22,877 · OtherSKAMANIA COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherLOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTE — $10,000 · Other+2 more — $8,500 · OtherDowntown Emergency Service Center — $55,000 · HealthDowntown Emergency…INTERVENTIONAL ORTHOBIOLOGICS FOUNDATION — $25,000 · HealthINTERVENTIONAL ORT…CASA FAMILIA INC — $60,000 · Housing & ShelterCASA FAMILIA …Lane County Diaper Bank — $35,000 · Human ServicesLane Count…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,000 · Human ServicesAmerican N…Transponder — $10,000 · Civil Rights
Other$294,712Health$80,000Housing & Shelter$60,000Human Services$45,000Civil Rights$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCASA FAMILIA INC — $60,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetDowntown Emergency Service Center — $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLane County Diaper Bank — $35,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetRAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK — $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFriends of the Columbia Gorge — $30,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetINTERVENTIONAL ORTHOBIOLOGICS FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTransponder — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CASA FAMILIA INC
  • Who funds Downtown Emergency Service Center
  • Who funds Lane County Diaper Bank
  • Who funds RAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Friends of the Columbia Gorge
  • Who funds INTERVENTIONAL ORTHOBIOLOGICS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds Transponder
  • Who funds LOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL12× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wrm Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 58%
  • Transponder58% of income from government
  • Casa Familia Inc53% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wrm Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Wrm Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph