Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wright Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$34k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$195kHealth$33kReligion$32kEducation$31kYouth Development$15kEnvironment$14kPublic Benefit$4kCommunity Improvement$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,800
Median grant
2
States reached
$828k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLAYHOUSE SQUARE FOUNDATION$10,000
CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART$10,000
CREEKSIDE ELEMENTARY$3,000
THE CHURCH AT RANCHO BERNARDO$3,000
FIELDSTONE FARM THERAPEUTIC CENTER$2,800
CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY$2,000
AVENUE CHURCH$1,800
UNIVERSITY SCHOOL$700
BLUECOATS INC$700
CLEVELAND BOTANICAL GARDENS$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $650) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $650 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$317k · 25 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
11

Total granted

$317k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+19%

Still filing today

44%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +71%
  • PS
    Playhouse Square Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +35%
  • CM
    CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $19k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • UP
    USD PRESIDENT'S CLUB
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO - BUSINESS
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • PU
    POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Phillips Exeter Academy

Unite goodness and knowledge and inspire youth from every quarter to lead purposeful lives. [text in quotations is taken from the academy's deed of gift, drafted in 1781] knowledge and goodness "above all, it is expected that the attention…

Education
2
The Winsor School

Our mission: the winsor school prepares young women to pursue their aspirations and contribute to the world.

Education
3
Springside Chestnut Hill Academy

See schedule owe are an inclusive community on a mission to inspire unbounded curiosity and independent thought in every one of our students. in a unique educational environment that extends well beyond campus, we nurture students'…

Education
4
Masters School

The masters school celebrates active participation, deep understanding, and meaningful connection. a community of diverse individuals, we gather to learn, to strive, to dare, to do - to be a power for good in the world.

—
5
Hillsdale College

Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…

Education
6
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
7
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
8
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
9
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
10
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
11
Pomona College

Throughout its history, pomona college has educated men and women of exceptional promise. we gather individuals, regardless of financial circumstances, into a small residential community that is strongly rooted in southern california yet…

Education
12
The Oaks School

In an atmosphere of mutual respect and responsibility, the oaks school prepares students to meet the world with the combined wisdom of an intelligent mind, a skilled hand, and a compassionate heart.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Ignites Northeastern Ohio Inc; the most unlike its peers is Abraxas High School Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART: $80,000 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ARTPlayhouse Square Foundation: $80,000 · Arts & CulturePlayhouse Square FoundationCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $19,000 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORYThe Musical Arts Association: $8,700 · Arts & CultureFIELDSTONE FARM THERAPEUTIC CENTER: $24,800 · OtherFIELDSTONE FARM THERAPEUTIC CENTERTHE CHURCH AT RANCHO BERNARDO: $12,500 · OtherTHE CHURCH AT RANCHO BERNARDOHOPE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $7,500 · OtherHOPE UNITED METHODIST CHURCHWASHINGTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $7,000 · OtherWASHINGTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAVENUE CHURCH: $6,300 · OtherAVENUE CHURCHPOWAY HIGH SCHOOL: $6,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY SCHOOL - TOWER SOCIETY: $6,000 · OtherCLEVELAND BOTANICAL GARDENS: $5,800 · OtherUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND: $5,750 · OtherST BARTHOLOMEW EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,550 · OtherBLUECOATS INC: $4,000 · Other+11 more: $18,300 · Other+11 moreUNIVERSITY SCHOOL: $14,200 · EducationHATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL: $1,900 · EducationHAWKEN SCHOOL: $1,500 · EducationPROCTOR ACADEMY: $1,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationCLEVELAND BOTANICAL GARDEN: $8,500 · EnvironmentBLUECOATS INC: $2,100 · Crime & LegalALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,500 · HealthTHE VINCENT CLUB INC: $500 · HealthBOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION FKA BOCA WEST COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $650 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$187,700Other$113,500Education$19,100Environment$8,500Crime & Legal$2,100Health$2,000Human Services$650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART: $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPlayhouse Square Foundation: $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $19,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY SCHOOL: $14,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Musical Arts Association: $8,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND BOTANICAL GARDEN: $8,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPTA CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS TEACHERS & STUDENTS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetBLUECOATS INC: $2,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL: $1,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWKEN SCHOOL: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROCTOR ACADEMY: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION FKA BOCA WEST COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VINCENT CLUB INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGE SNOW SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds Playhouse Square Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds The Musical Arts Association ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds PTA CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS TEACHERS & STUDENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUECOATS INC ↗
  • Who funds HATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HAWKEN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PROCTOR ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds BOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION FKA BOCA WEST COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ABRAXAS HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE VINCENT CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IGNITES NORTHEASTERN OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE SNOW SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wright Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wright Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Wright Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Wright Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wright’s filings →

    More from the funding graph