Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wr Winslow Residuary Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$208k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$2.6MHealth$1.8MHuman Services$1.3MReligion$432kYouth Development$137k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$79,078
Median grant
5
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ELIZABETH CITY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION$208,404
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$158,271
UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF MARYLAND OFFICE$138,473
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR BALT$79,078
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF DC$79,078
NC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC$79,078
VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC$79,078
GEORGETOWN UNIV SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$59,395
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$59,395
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$59,395
THE METHODIST HOME OF DC$52,796
THE SALVATION ARMY$52,796
FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES$52,796
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $478k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $46k → 8%FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $46k → 8%FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $46k → 8%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC: $68k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC: $68k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC: $68k → 14%THE METHODIST HOME OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: $46k → 14%THE METHODIST HOME OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: $46k → 14%THE METHODIST HOME OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: $46k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.8M · 19 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
0

Total granted

$5.8M
$0

Still filing today

47%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    4× · 2020–2023 · $547k · revenue +47%
  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $316k · revenue +36%
  • TG
    The George Washington University
    6× · 2020–2025 · $316k · revenue +22%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    University of New Haven

    The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

    Education
    2
    Furman University

    The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

    Education
    3
    University of Virginia Investment Management Company

    The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

    Education
    4
    Marymount University

    Marymount is a nationally ranked comprehensive catholic university, guided by the traditions of the religious of the sacred heart of mary, that emphasizes intellectual curiosity, service to others, and a global perspective. a marymount…

    —
    5
    University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

    Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

    —
    6
    University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

    Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

    —
    7
    Washington College

    Washington college challenges and inspires emerging citizen leaders to discover lives of purpose and passion.core valueswe share these values of our founding patron, george washington: integrity, determination, curiosity, civility,…

    Education
    8
    Columbia College

    Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

    Education
    9
    University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

    University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

    —
    10
    University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

    Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

    Education
    11
    University of Maryland Physicians Pa

    Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

    —
    12
    Harvard Club of Washington Dc

    To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.

    Education
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University; the most unlike its peers is Florence Crittenton Services of Greater Washington. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    10/10
    Grantees still filing
    8/10
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    ELIZABETH CITY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION: $1,108,764 · OtherELIZABETH CITY HEALTH AND REHABILITATIONUNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF MARYLAND OFFICE: $736,696 · OtherUNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF MARYLAND OFFICECHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $295,108 · OtherCHILDRENS HOSPITALTHE SALVATION ARMY: $280,844 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF DC: $215,814 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF DCLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR BALT: $215,814 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR BALTNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $204,933 · OtherNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITYJOHNS HOPKINS AT KESWICK: $153,850 · OtherFLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES: $144,088 · OtherTHE METHODIST HOME OF DC: $144,088 · OtherVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $420,747 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION IN…GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $315,947 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYThe George Washington University: $315,947 · EducationThe George Washington Unive…NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $215,814 · EducationNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVER…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $213,449 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $546,904 · HealthCHILDREN'S HO…LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR BALTIMORE INC: $204,933 · HealthLITTLE SISTER…LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $204,933 · Human ServicesTHE METHODIST HOME OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: $136,756 · Human ServicesFlorence Crittenton Services of Greater Washington: $136,756 · Human Services
    Other$3,499,999Education$1,481,904Health$751,837Human Services$478,445

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $546,904 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $420,747 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $315,947 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $315,947 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $215,814 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $213,449 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR BALTIMORE INC: $204,933 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $204,933 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE METHODIST HOME OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: $136,756 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFlorence Crittenton Services of Greater Washington: $136,756 over 3y, 2.5% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
    • Who funds VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
    • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
    • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
    • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR BALTIMORE INC ↗
    • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC ↗
    • Who funds THE METHODIST HOME OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ↗
    • Who funds Florence Crittenton Services of Greater Washington ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    National Philanthropic TrustPA9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Wr Winslow Residuary Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wr Winslow Residuary Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
    • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wr Winslow Residuary’s filings →

    More from the funding graph