Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Wr Winslow Residuary Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$208k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$2.6MHealth$1.8MHuman Services$1.3MReligion$432kYouth Development$137k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$79,078
Median grant
5
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ELIZABETH CITY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION$208,404
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$158,271
UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF MARYLAND OFFICE$138,473
NC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC$79,078
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR BALT$79,078
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF DC$79,078
VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC$79,078
GEORGETOWN UNIV SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$59,395
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$59,395
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$59,395
FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES$52,796
THE SALVATION ARMY$52,796
THE METHODIST HOME OF DC$52,796
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $478k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $46k → 8%FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $46k → 8%FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $46k → 8%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC: $68k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC: $68k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC: $68k → 14%THE METHODIST HOME OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: $46k → 14%THE METHODIST HOME OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: $46k → 14%THE METHODIST HOME OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: $46k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.8M · 19 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
0

Total granted

$5.8M
$0

Still filing today

47%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    4× · 2020–2023 · $547k · revenue +47%
  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $316k · revenue +36%
  • TG
    The George Washington University
    6× · 2020–2025 · $316k · revenue +22%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    University of New Haven

    The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

    Education
    2
    Furman University

    The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

    Education
    3
    University of Virginia Investment Management Company

    The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

    Education
    4
    Marymount University

    Marymount is a nationally ranked comprehensive catholic university, guided by the traditions of the religious of the sacred heart of mary, that emphasizes intellectual curiosity, service to others, and a global perspective. a marymount…

    5
    University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

    Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

    6
    University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

    Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

    7
    Washington College

    Washington college challenges and inspires emerging citizen leaders to discover lives of purpose and passion.core valueswe share these values of our founding patron, george washington: integrity, determination, curiosity, civility,…

    Education
    8
    Columbia College

    Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

    Education
    9
    University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

    University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

    10
    University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

    Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

    Education
    11
    University of Maryland Physicians Pa

    Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

    12
    Harvard Club of Washington Dc

    To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.

    Education

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University and the most unlike its peers is Florence Crittenton Services of Greater Washington. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    10/10
    Grantees still filing
    8/10
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    ELIZABETH CITY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION — $1,108,764 · OtherELIZABETH CITY HEALTH AND REHABILITATIONUNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF MARYLAND OFFICE — $736,696 · OtherUNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF MARYLAND OFFICECHILDRENS HOSPITAL — $295,108 · OtherCHILDRENS HOSPITALTHE SALVATION ARMY — $280,844 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF DC — $215,814 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF DCLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR BALT — $215,814 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR BALTNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY — $204,933 · OtherNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITYJOHNS HOPKINS AT KESWICK — $153,850 · OtherFLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES — $144,088 · OtherTHE METHODIST HOME OF DC — $144,088 · OtherVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC — $420,747 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION IN…GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $315,947 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYThe George Washington University — $315,947 · EducationThe George Washington Unive…NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $215,814 · EducationNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVER…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $213,449 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $546,904 · HealthCHILDREN'S HO…LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR BALTIMORE INC — $204,933 · HealthLITTLE SISTER…LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC — $204,933 · Human ServicesTHE METHODIST HOME OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA — $136,756 · Human ServicesFlorence Crittenton Services of Greater Washington — $136,756 · Human Services
    Other$3,499,999Education$1,481,904Health$751,837Human Services$478,445

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $546,904 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC — $420,747 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $315,947 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University — $315,947 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $215,814 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $213,449 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR BALTIMORE INC — $204,933 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC — $204,933 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE METHODIST HOME OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA — $136,756 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFlorence Crittenton Services of Greater Washington — $136,756 over 3y, 2.5% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    • Who funds VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC
    • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    • Who funds The George Washington University
    • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR BALTIMORE INC
    • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC
    • Who funds THE METHODIST HOME OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
    • Who funds Florence Crittenton Services of Greater Washington

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    National Philanthropic TrustPA9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Wr Winslow Residuary Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
    • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph