Skip to content
Worthington Regional Health Care Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Worthington Regional Health Care Foundation Inc

The corporation is formed exclusively for charitable and educational purposes, and in connection therewith, exclusively for the health, wellness and education of the residents of worthington and surrounding communities.

$575k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$131k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$833kFood & Nutrition$489kPublic Benefit$440kHealth$256kArts & Culture$230kRecreation & Sports$199kReligion$88kEducation$82kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $548,758, the rows itemized in this filing. The $575,008 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $26,250 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $361k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA$131,209
WAYBA$100,000
MANNA FOOD PANTRY$80,000
EVERY MEAL$50,000
PROJECT TURNABOUT$40,000
PROJECT MORNINGSTAR$30,000
RAYS UNLIMITED$30,000
WORTHINGTON CHRISTIAN CHURCH$20,729
WORTHINGTON UNITED INC$15,000
SOUTHWEST MN EMS CORP$14,270
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES$10,000
CITY OF WORTHINGTON$10,000
REBUILDING TOGETHER$10,000
ISD 511$7,550
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $823k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YMCA: $131k → 11%YMCA: $122k → 11%YMCA: $121k → 11%YMCA: $108k → 11%YMCA: $107k → 11%YMCA: $103k → 11%YMCA: $101k → 11%LOVE INC: $20k → 11%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 12 repeat orgs$367k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
14

Total granted

$2.4M
$233k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+31%

Still filing today

67%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $134k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WORTHINGTON INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $793k · revenue +4%
  • MF
    MANNA FOOD PANTRY INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $309k · revenue +2% · 50% of their budget
  • EM
    EVERY MEAL
    3× · 2022–2024 · $150k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF ROUND LAKE
    one grant, 2021 · $46k
  • FL
    FIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $45k
  • LI
    LOVE INC OF WORTHINGTON
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayzata-Plymouth Meals on Wheels

Providing Low Cost Lunches to shut-ins in the community.

—
2
West Central Initiative

Serving to improve west central minnesota through funding, programs, and technical assistance. vision of a vibrant, inclusive, and sustainable world starts here in west central minnesota.

Philanthropy
3
Midwest Challenge Inc

Sharing the gospel while providing hope and transformation.

Health
4
Wacosa

To provide individuals with disabilities the opportunity to work and live in their community.

—
5
Working Partnerships Inc

To promote the well being of working minnesotans in minneapolis and the west metro region through charitable and educational activities.

Employment
6
Winona Area Chamber of Commerce

To promote business development and tourism in winona minnesota and the surrounding area

—
7
Royal Promise

Answering the physical and spiritual needs of the most vulnerable, through care and advocacy, to make disciples of the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Philanthropy
8
Minnesota Recovery Connection

Minnesota Recovery Connection's mission is to strengthen the recovery community through peer-to-peer support, public education and advocacy.

Human Services
9
Wayland Mennonite Home

Caring for others as you would have them care for you.

Human Services
10
Northwest Minnesota Arts Council

Support and enhance the development of the arts in northwestern minnesota. facilitate and encourage the creation and appreciation of the arts.

Arts & Culture
11
Walk-in Counseling Center Inc

We provide free, anonymous mental health counseling to anyone with an urgent need and few resources, all by clinically trained volunteer counselors, team consultants and by receptionists.

Health
12
Walker Adult Day Services

Walker Adult Day Services promotes healthy aging with the focus to improve and enhance overall wellness. Through a system of supportive services in one location the program conveniently assists people experiencing isolation due to physical…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Love Inc of Worthington; the most unlike its peers is Keagans Cause Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF WORTHINGTON: $399,151 · OtherCITY OF WORTHINGTONNobles County Historical Society: $210,114 · OtherNobles County Historical SocietySANFORD: $163,800 · OtherSANFORDWORTHINGTON CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $66,846 · OtherWORTHINGTON CHRISTIAN CHURCHCITY OF ROUND LAKE: $46,346 · OtherISD 511: $45,725 · OtherFIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH: $45,000 · Other+12 more: $137,829 · Other+12 moreYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WORTHINGTON INC: $793,152 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION …+2 more: $30,000 · Human ServicesMANNA FOOD PANTRY INC: $308,947 · Food & NutritionMANNA FOOD PANTRY I…EVERY MEAL: $150,000 · Food & NutritionEVERY MEALWORTHINGTON AREA YOUTH BASEBALL ASSOCIATION: $145,524 · Recreation & SportsREVERENCE FOR LIFE AND CONCERN FOR PEOPLE INC: $40,000 · HealthRAYS UNLIMITED: $30,000 · HealthPROJECT MORNING STAR: $30,000 · HealthSOUTHWEST MINNESOTA EMS CORP: $14,270 · HealthOUR LADY OF GUADALUPE FREE CLINIC: $12,000 · HealthWORTHINGTON UNITED INC: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF THE AUDITORIUM INC: $20,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,114,811Human Services$823,152Food & Nutrition$458,947Recreation & Sports$145,524Health$126,270Youth Development$30,000Arts & Culture$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WORTHINGTON INC: $793,152 over 7y, 12% of budgetMANNA FOOD PANTRY INC: $308,947 over 5y, 50% of budgetNobles County Historical Society: $210,114 over 2y, 28% of budgetEVERY MEAL: $150,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetWORTHINGTON AREA YOUTH BASEBALL ASSOCIATION: $145,524 over 3y, 94% of budgetREVERENCE FOR LIFE AND CONCERN FOR PEOPLE INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWORTHINGTON UNITED INC: $30,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetRAYS UNLIMITED: $30,000 over 1y, 64% of budgetWORTHINGTON HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC: $23,210 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetLOVE INC OF WORTHINGTON: $20,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetNOBLES COUNTY DAC: $15,350 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST MINNESOTA EMS CORP: $14,270 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetOUR LADY OF GUADALUPE FREE CLINIC: $12,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetA C E OF SOUTHWEST MINNESOTA: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRebuilding Together - Twin Cities: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMINNESOTA WEST FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSouthwestern MN Opportunity Council: $9,101 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Southwest Initiative …United Way of Nobles …Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Southwest Initiative FoundationMN29× affinity12 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Southwest Initiative Foundation · United Way of Nobles County · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Worthington Regional Health Care Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Worthington Regional Health Care Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Worthington Regional Health Care’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home