· Public charity
World Missions Today
See Schedule O for a descripton of the organizations mission.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $288,752 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,430,601 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,141,849 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k6 grants · $126k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $163k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Leadership Development | $113,015 |
| Academia Discipulos de Cristo | $50,000 |
| Top of the Hill | $40,000 |
| Missionary Ventures | $21,000 |
| Augustian Prep | $20,000 |
| Christian Motorcycle | $19,737 |
| Agape Interdenom | $15,000 |
| Last Door Ministry | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 15% of grant dollars ($619k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 85% that went abroad ($3.4M) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Beyond the US — 85% of all-years giving ($3.4M)
2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $178k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CSCOLEGIO SAN GABRIEL INC6× · 2019–2024 · $373k · revenue +43%
- WSWASHBURN SCHOOL INC5× · 2019–2023 · $290k · revenue +44%
- TKTHE KINGDOM CHRISTIAN ACADEMY CORP4× · 2021–2024 · $224k · revenue +30%
Funded once
- CDCOLEGIO DE LA INMACULADA CONCEPCIONone grant, 2019 · $75k · revenue -28%
- RAReach A Villagegraduatedone grant, 2019 · $38k · revenue +174%
- FWFAMILY WORSHIP CENTER INCone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Education, Humanitarian, Community outreach and evangelism ministry. Provide Orphan Care, Train Youth in Career Paths, Train Pastors and Others in Bible School, Prison Ministry, Provide Elementary School for about 300 Children
Pastor training
North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…
Education
Provide classroom instruction and educational services to K-12 students
None
Guided by Christian faith, St. Therese Academy guides students with Montessori, Catechesis of the Good Shepherd and classical principles to live out the gospel message, achieve academic excellence, and joyfulluy lead by faith, virtue and…
Rooted Ministries endeavors to train, equip, and empower people to a greater, Christ-centered destiny in Gulu, Uganda, and Orange County, California. Rooted Ministries Nursery and Primary School, and Rooted Ministries Secondary Academy…
Originally we had a childrens home in nicaragua, but with recent changes from the government, we have converted both of the houses to be used for housing groups that come to nicaragua on mission trips from the usa.
Enhance children education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Kingdom Christian Academy Corp and the most unlike its peers is Top of the Hill Girls Junior and Senior School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COLEGIO SAN GABRIEL INC ↗
- Who funds WASHBURN SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE KINGDOM CHRISTIAN ACADEMY CORP ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds COLEGIO DE LA INMACULADA CONCEPCION ↗
- Who funds ST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds TOP OF THE HILL GIRLS JUNIOR AND SENIOR SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Reach A Village ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN MOTORCYCLISTS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Nathaniel's Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds LAST DOOR MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds MULTIPLICATION NETWORK MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds REACH OUT ORPHANAGE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization World Missions Today funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to World Missions Today?
Find your warmest path to World Missions Today through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.