Loading…
· Public charity
WORKFORCE INVESTMENT COUNCIL OF
Clackamas workforce partnership serves youth, adult, and dislocated workers through its partnerships with private industry and workforce development providers.
$3.6M
Granted FY2023
5
Grants
1
Communities
$2.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 97% of WORKFORCE INVESTMENT COUNCIL OF’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
—
2020
experiencenorthwestsupportssocial determinantsdeterminants health
2021
—
2022
—
2023
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 5 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- $50k–250k2 grants · $393k
- $250k+3 grants · $3.0M
$309,291
Median grant
1
States reached
$955k
Total assets
Largest grants
- CLACKAMAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,962,703
- IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORG$739,210
- CLACKAMAS EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRIC$309,291
- CLACKAMAS COUNTY CHILDREN FAMILY$249,099
- ANTFARM YOUTH SERVICES$143,568
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 9%. 48% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$15M · 6 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +251% since the first grant, against +124% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
6
10
Total granted
$15M
$59k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+251%
+124%
Still filing today
67%
90%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORG6× · 2018–2023 · $1.9M · revenue +139%- NFNORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES4× · 2018–2021 · $584k · revenue +251%
- OMOREGON MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PTNP6× · 2018–2023 · $352k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- DDEVNWgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +814%
MENTAL HEALTH ASSOC OF OREGONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +717%
FOLKTIME INCone grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue -19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Clackamas Service Center
Clackamas service center is an inclusive, "one-stop" community center for individuals and families seeking food relief and resources for improved health, dignity, and stability.
Human Services
2
Oregon Casa Network
To lead oregon's casa programs to provide a strong voice for every abused and neglected child statewide.
Human Services
3
Beyond These Walls
Beyond These Walls supports LGBTQ people impacted by incarceration in Oregon and Washington by providing direct service housing and advocacy.
Civil Rights
4
Oregon Child Abuse Solutions
To ensure children and youth in oregon have access to high quality, comprehensive services and resources to address child abuse.
Crime & Legal
5
Northwest Counseling Service Inc
Housing Counseling Services
Housing & Shelter
6
Morrison Child and Family Services
A leader in providing behavioral health services in oregon and beyond.
Health
7
Priority Oregon
To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.
—
8
Every Child Central Oregon
Mobilizing the community to uplift children and families impacted by foster care in Oregon.
Human Services
9
LArche Portland
At l'arche portland people with and without developmental disabilities create home and build community together. we nurture long-term mutual relationships that reveal the gifts of people with developmental disabilities. in doing so we…
Human Services
10
Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council
The Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council is a local nonprofit organization that strives to enhance and restore habitat for fish and wildlife our community and for future generations. Our Board of Directors consists of seven members with…
Environment
11
Oregon Agricultural Trust
Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.
Environment
12
Northeast Oregon Network
To promote Eastern Oregon health by reducing personal and regional barriers for residents.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health & Addiction Association of and the most unlike its peers is Clackamas Women's Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$15,146,834Community Improvement$351,890Human Services$23,090Crime & Legal$12,000Health$6,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORG ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds OREGON MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PTNP ↗
- Who funds ANTFARM YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds DEVNW ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSOC OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds FOLKTIME INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES ↗
- Who funds PARROTT CREEK CHILD AND FAMILY SERV ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ESTACADA COMMUNITY CENTE ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES TO CHANGE ↗
- Who funds THE INN HOME FOR BOYS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Oregon Community FoundationOR23.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Careoregon Inc · Providence Health & Services - Oregon · Meyer Memorial Trust · Juan Young Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Wheeler Foundation · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation WORKFORCE INVESTMENT COUNCIL OF funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Oregon Manufacturing Extension — 83% of income from government
- Northwest Family Services — 35% of income from government
- Antfarm Inc — 29% of income from government
- Parrott Creek Child and Family Services — 20% of income from government
- Corvallis Neighborhood Housing Services — 11% of income from government
- The Immigrant and Refugee Community — 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: NORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.5× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 930841022 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on NORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Workforce Investment Council Of?
Find your warmest path to Workforce Investment Council Of through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines