Skip to content

· Private foundation

Woodpile Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$25kAnimals$9kReligion$4kArts & Culture$3kPhilanthropy$500Recreation & Sports$250
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$369k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOTO FOUNDATION$5,000
WEGA ARTS$2,000
VICTORY CHURCH$1,200
OUR PACK ANIMAL RESCUE$500
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE FOX VALLEY REGION INC$500
WAUPACA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$200
ST MARK'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$80
WAUPACA COMMUNITY ARTS BOARD INC$35
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE FOX VALLEY REGION INC: $500 → 7%TOTO FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%TOTO FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%TOTO FOUNDATION: $250 → 11%WEGA ARTS: $2k → 11%FOUNDATIONS FOR LIVING: $25k → 11%VICTORY CHURCH: $3k → 11%WAUPACA FIELD STATION: $2k → 11%VICTORY CHURCH: $1k → 11%CHAIN O' LAKES WATER SKI CLUB INC: $250 → 11%WAUPACA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $200 → 11%CAMP CLEGHORN CHAPEL CORPORATION: $100 → 11%ST MARK'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $80 → 11%ST MARK'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $70 → 11%WAUPACA COMMUNITY ARTS BOARD INC: $35 → 11%OUR PACK ANIMAL RESCUE: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10k · 3 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$10k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-53%
-5%

Still filing today

33%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Arts & CultureAnimalsHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    TOTO FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $6k · revenue -53%
  • VC
    VICTORY CHURCH
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4k
  • SM
    ST MARKS EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    2× · 2023–2024 · $150

Funded once

  • FF
    FOUNDATIONS FOR LIVING INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -23%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $350
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society of Waupaca County Inc

The Humane Society of Waupaca County (HSWC) provides the following services for the citizens of Waupaca County and the surrounding area. HSWC provides shelter, veterinary care, spaying and neutering and adoption services for homeless pets.

Animals
2
Waupaca Area Chamber Foundation Inc

boost community involvement for individuals and businesses.

Human Services
3
Waupaca Public Library Foundation Inc

The Development of Programs to: Focus public attention on library services, facilities and need in the Waupaca area; To promote growth of the Library by developing and administering an active gift and memorial program for the Library.

Education
4
The Wausaukee Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Waupaca Area Food Pantry Inc

To supply food to the under privileged.

Food & Nutrition
6
The Wa Wui Ltd

Provide civic facility for the greater tomahawk wi community

—
7
Waupaca County Natural Resources Foundation Inc

Acquire, protect and enhance lands

Recreation & Sports
8
Poor Farm Exhibitions and Press Incorporated

The Poor Farm Exhibitions And Press Incorporated facilitates and presents artist's projects and year-long exhibitions at the former Waupaca County Poor Farm built in 1876 in Little Wolf, WI.

Arts & Culture
9
Wabeno Area Players
Arts & Culture
10
Whitetails Unlimited Washington Cou Chapter 9362

To support safety & disabled hunter programs in washington cty, wisconsin

—
11
Center for the Visual Arts

Center for the visual arts (cva) in downtown wausau enhances the vitality and vibrancy of the community, offering art classes, gallery space for exhibits, and community programs. not for profit art centers like the cva, provide exhibit…

Arts & Culture
12
Whitewater Valley Railroad Association Inc

The whitewater valley railroad is a heritage railroad dedicated to the preservation and presentation of branch line railroading.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chain O' Lakes Water Ski Club Inc; the most unlike its peers is Foundations for Living Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOUNDATIONS FOR LIVING INC: $25,090 · Housing & ShelterFOUNDATIONS FOR LIVING INCTOTO FOUNDATION INC: $6,350 · AnimalsTOTO FOUNDATION IN…OUR PACK ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $500 · AnimalsOUR PACK ANIMAL RE…VICTORY CHURCH: $3,900 · OtherVICTORY CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $1,835 · OtherIndividual grant …Individual grant recipient: $350 · OtherIndividual grant …+2 more: $250 · OtherWEYAUWEGA ARTS ORGANIZATION INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureWAUPACA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $200 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $35 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE FOX VALLEY REGION INC: $500 · PhilanthropyCHAIN O' LAKES WATER SKI CLUB INC: $250 · Youth Development
Housing & Shelter$25,090Animals$6,850Other$6,335Arts & Culture$2,235Philanthropy$500Youth Development$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOUNDATIONS FOR LIVING INC: $25,090 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetTOTO FOUNDATION INC: $6,350 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetWEYAUWEGA ARTS ORGANIZATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetOUR PACK ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE FOX VALLEY REGION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAIN O' LAKES WATER SKI CLUB INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWAUPACA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWAUPACA COMMUNITY ARTS BOARD INC: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region IncWI19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Woodpile Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Woodpile Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Woodpile Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Woodpile Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Woodpile’s filings →

    More from the funding graph