· Private foundation
Woodpile Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TOTO FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| WEGA ARTS | $2,000 |
| VICTORY CHURCH | $1,200 |
| OUR PACK ANIMAL RESCUE | $500 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE FOX VALLEY REGION INC | $500 |
| WAUPACA HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $200 |
| ST MARK'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $80 |
| WAUPACA COMMUNITY ARTS BOARD INC | $35 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TFTOTO FOUNDATION INC3× · 2022–2024 · $6k · revenue -53%
- VCVICTORY CHURCH2× · 2023–2024 · $4k
- SMST MARKS EPISCOPAL CHURCH2× · 2023–2024 · $150
Funded once
- FFFOUNDATIONS FOR LIVING INCone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -23%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $2k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $350
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Humane Society of Waupaca County (HSWC) provides the following services for the citizens of Waupaca County and the surrounding area. HSWC provides shelter, veterinary care, spaying and neutering and adoption services for homeless pets.
boost community involvement for individuals and businesses.
The Development of Programs to: Focus public attention on library services, facilities and need in the Waupaca area; To promote growth of the Library by developing and administering an active gift and memorial program for the Library.
To supply food to the under privileged.
Provide civic facility for the greater tomahawk wi community
Acquire, protect and enhance lands
The Poor Farm Exhibitions And Press Incorporated facilitates and presents artist's projects and year-long exhibitions at the former Waupaca County Poor Farm built in 1876 in Little Wolf, WI.
To support safety & disabled hunter programs in washington cty, wisconsin
Center for the visual arts (cva) in downtown wausau enhances the vitality and vibrancy of the community, offering art classes, gallery space for exhibits, and community programs. not for profit art centers like the cva, provide exhibit…
The whitewater valley railroad is a heritage railroad dedicated to the preservation and presentation of branch line railroading.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chain O' Lakes Water Ski Club Inc and the most unlike its peers is Foundations for Living Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FOUNDATIONS FOR LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds TOTO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WEYAUWEGA ARTS ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds OUR PACK ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE FOX VALLEY REGION INC ↗
- Who funds CHAIN O' LAKES WATER SKI CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds WAUPACA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds WAUPACA COMMUNITY ARTS BOARD INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Woodpile Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Woodpile Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Woodpile Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.