· Private foundation
Wood & Marie Hannah Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k11 grants · $54k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $153k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HILDEGARD HOUSE | $50,000 |
| CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE | $27,000 |
| PASSIONIST EARTH & SPIRIT CENTER | $15,000 |
| FOOD LITERACY PROJECT AT OXMOOR FARM INC | $15,000 |
| KENTUCKY HUMANITIES COUNCIL | $13,060 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF KENTUCKY | $12,500 |
| WELLSPRING INC | $10,000 |
| YMCA OF GREATER LOUISVILLE | $10,000 |
| CARRIAGE HOUSE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES | $10,000 |
| ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE | $10,000 |
| LIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER | $10,000 |
| FAMILY COMMUNITY CLINIC | $10,000 |
| AWAKE MINISTRIES | $10,000 |
| OPERATION OPEN ARMS | $9,000 |
| SPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF KENTUCKY | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $241k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
44 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
KENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE4× · 2020–2025 · $95k · revenue +33%- CPCABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC6× · 2020–2025 · $81k · revenue +68%
- ALALICE LLOYD COLLEGE4× · 2020–2025 · $40k · revenue +78%
Funded once
- APAMERICAN PRINTING HOUSE FOR THE BLIND INCone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
- HHHARBOR HOUSE OF LOUISVILLE INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +151%
- BBLACKACREone grant, 2022 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Goodwill's mission is to help people with disabilities or other disadvantages achieve and maintain employment to gain a better quality of life.
To provide families in western kentucky with education, advocacy and treatment that prevents child abuse, encourages family stability, promotes healthy relationships, enhances well-being and cultivates safe, nurturing families.
To improve the quality of life for all kentuckians through research, education and advocacy on important policy issues facing the commonwealth.
Day spring provides a path forward for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities through services that cultivate hope, belonging, and community.we envision every person being valued and having a path forward regardless of…
Children's advocacy centers of kentucky, inc. seeks to build relationships at the state and national levels by collaborating with partners which will benefit the work of kentucky child advocacy centers.
Louisville collegiate school inspires academic excellence, extraordinary character and global citizenship.
To increase access to the courts and high-quality legal representation for people with low and moderate incomes living in kentucky through innovative partnerships with the judiciary, the civil legal aid programs, private bar, law schools,…
To eliminate barriers, achieve economic security and empower families by partnering with other service providers.
Empowering people with disabilities to live independent lives in the community.
Endeavor Louisville is leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement in Kentucky, Indiana and Ohio, catalyzing long-term economic growth by selecting, mentoring, and supporting the best high-impact entrepreneurs in our region.…
Thrive by 5 louisville is making early learning a top priority for louisville, breaking down barriers for the future of our children and city.
Shape public policy and practice to improve the well-being of kentucky's at-risk children and families through advocacy, leadership, collaboration, and education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cabbage Patch Settlement House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Operation Open Arms Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PRINTING HOUSE FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds Hildegard House Incorporated ↗
- Who funds Cerebral Palsy KIDS Center Inc ↗
- Who funds ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Kentucky Humanities Council Inc ↗
- Who funds PASSIONIST EARTH & SPIRIT CENTER IN ↗
- Who funds the Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Louisville Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC ↗
- Who funds HARBOR HOUSE OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds WATERFRONT BOTANICAL GARDENS INC ↗
- Who funds Family Community Clinic Inc ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF KENTUCKIANA INC ↗
- Who funds WELLSPRING INC ↗
- Who funds The Food Literacy Project at Oxmoor Farm Inc ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS KENTUCKY INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF THE RIVER REGION ↗
- Who funds THE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC ↗
- Who funds TEACH KENTUCKY INC ↗
- Who funds ST JOHN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY & CHILDREN'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF KENTUCKIANA INC ↗
- Who funds Love City Inc ↗
- Who funds Down Syndrome of Louisville Inc ↗
- Who funds USPIRITUS INC (BELLEWOOD & BROOKLAWN) ↗
- Who funds OPERATION OPEN ARMS INC ↗
- Who funds PAWS WITH PURPOSE INC ↗
- Who funds SOS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds TALBOT HOUSE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Gheens Foundation Inc · Cralle Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · Kosair Charities Committee Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · V V Cooke Foundation Corporation · Republic Bank Foundation Inc · The Whas Crusade for Children Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wood & Marie Hannah Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Wood & Marie Hannah Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Wood & Marie Hannah Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.