Skip to content

California · Public charity

Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project

Founded in 1991, the Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project (WRRAP) assists individuals of all ethnicities, sexual orientation, gender identities, socio-economic status, and cultural backgrounds who are financially unable to pay for safe, legal abortions or emergency contraceptives.

$1.8M
Granted FY2023
39
Grants FY2023
39
Organizations funded FY2023
26%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2023
$28,680
Largest grant, FY2023
$210,238
Organizations funded a year
18 to 39
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
15
Total assets, FY2023
$9.5M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 26% of the organizations Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project funded were first-time grantees, receiving 13% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $236k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202339$1.8M26%
FY202237$1.0M59%
FY202123$491k22%
FY202018$405k28%
FY201920$402k30%
FY201825$484k44%
FY201725$414kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$4.9MHuman Services$122k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
WV
VA
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Philadelphia Women's Center$331,3547n/a
Columbus Women's Health Organization$317,8226n/a
Cherry Hill Womens Center$296,4017n/a
Jacob Kalo MD PC dba East Gyn Ctr and Eastland Wmn Ctr (S)$265,4802n/a
Allegheny Reproductive Health Center$237,4815n/a
Christie Pitney Forward Midwifery (S)$202,3692n/a
Memphis Center For Reproductive Health Inc$197,92561%
Heritage Clinic For Women$182,0395n/a
Atlanta Women's Medical Center Inc$173,2327n/a
Rachna KaulMaitri Wellness (S)$152,5352n/a
Show all 63 grantees
All grantees of Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Philadelphia Women's Center$331,3547n/a
Columbus Women's Health Organization$317,8226n/a
Cherry Hill Womens Center$296,4017n/a
Jacob Kalo MD PC dba East Gyn Ctr and Eastland Wmn Ctr (S)$265,4802n/a
Allegheny Reproductive Health Center$237,4815n/a
Christie Pitney Forward Midwifery (S)$202,3692n/a
Memphis Center For Reproductive Health Inc$197,92561%
Heritage Clinic For Women$182,0395n/a
Atlanta Women's Medical Center Inc$173,2327n/a
Rachna KaulMaitri Wellness (S)$152,5352n/a
Dr Michael BenjaminBSSI$129,5104n/a
Margaret CarpenterNightingale Medical$122,6612n/a
Femhealth USA Inc$119,85960%
Robin TuckerMetro Area Advanced Practice Healthcare$118,5322n/a
Razel RemenPills by Post LLC$117,6562n/a
Women's Med Group Professional Corporation$104,8344n/a
Feminist Womens Health Center Inc$102,34561%
Summit Medical Associates PC$99,0045n/a
Knoxville Center for Reproductive Health$95,6436n/a
Delaware County Women's Center Inc$87,0602n/a
Allentown Womens Center$81,2955n/a
Access Health Care Center$75,3054n/a
Erika BlissEquinox Primary Care PLLC$72,3652n/a
Manisha Kumar dba Ishani Village LLC$71,6321n/a
Planned Parenthood Great Plains$60,35830%
Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains Inc$58,53121%
University of NC Chapel HillUNC Maternal Fetal Medicine$52,8682n/a
Choix Inc$50,3191n/a
A Woman's Choice of Jacksonville Inc$45,5302n/a
Garden State Gynecology$38,8102n/a
Parkmed NYC$30,7902n/a
Planned Parenthood Association of Utah$30,77040%
The Hope Clinic for Women Ltd - IL$29,4022n/a
Hope Medical Group for Women$28,4153n/a
Igh Pllc$28,0142n/a
Southwestern Women's Options$27,4023n/a
Women's Health Center of West Virginia Inc$25,52521%
A Woman's Choice of Raleigh Inc$25,4552n/a
Access Health Group Ltd$22,8502n/a
Remy Coeytaux MD PC$22,5211n/a
Austin Women's Health Center$21,3492n/a
Preterm Cleveland Inc$21,34020%
DuPont Clinic$20,5001n/a
Dr David Wiebe MD PC$20,1941n/a
A Woman's Choice of Greensboro Inc$18,2852n/a
Family Planning Associates Medical Group Ltd$13,7501n/a
Women's Heath Care Centerdelta Clinic of Baton Rouge$12,0501n/a
Katharine V Morrison dba Buffalo Womens Services$11,4201n/a
A Woman's Choice of Charlotte$9,4401n/a
Eden Surgical Management$9,4001n/a
Access Health Center$8,8101n/a
Planned Parenthood Minnesota North Dakota South Dakota$8,45410%
Planned Parenthood North Central States$8,29710%
The Hope Clinic for Women Ltd$7,8841n/a
Family Planning Associates Medical Group$7,4001n/a
Equity Clinic SC$6,7601n/a
Boulder Abortion Clinic$6,7251n/a
All Women's Health Center of Gainesville Inc$6,4401n/a
Full Circle Health Center$6,1981n/a
Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood Great Rivers$5,73710%
Houston Women's Clinic$5,4801n/a
Whole Woman's Health Alliance$5,35010%
Kristina ShepherdLilith Care LLC (S)$5,0901n/a

Plus 21 recipients with no EIN on record ($451k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMemphis Center For Reproductive Health Inc: $197,925 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetFemhealth USA Inc: $119,859 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFeminist Womens Health Center Inc: $102,345 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Great Plains: $60,358 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetComprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains Inc: $58,531 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Association of Utah: $30,770 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWomen's Health Center of West Virginia Inc: $25,525 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPreterm Cleveland Inc: $21,340 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Minnesota North Dakota South Dakota: $8,454 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood North Central States: $8,297 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetReproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood Great Rivers: $5,737 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWhole Woman's Health Alliance: $5,350 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hopewell FundDC59.5× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hopewell Fund · Abortion Care Network · The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc · National Network of Abortion Funds · National Institute for Reproductive Health Inc · Women Donors Network · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Direct Relief · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project?

Find your warmest path to Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project

How much does Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project give?
Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project reported 39 grants totaling $1,840,089 in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 18 and 39 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2023, its largest causes are Health (98%), Human Services (2%).
Who are Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2023: Philadelphia Women's Center ($331k), Columbus Women's Health Organization ($318k), Cherry Hill Womens Center ($296k).
Does Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 26% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Hopewell Fund, Abortion Care Network, The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation.
Where is Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project based?
Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $2.7M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project’s filings →

More from the funding graph