· Public charity
Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project
Founded in 1991, the Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project (WRRAP) assists individuals of all ethnicities, sexual orientation, gender identities, socio-economic status, and cultural backgrounds who are financially unable to pay for safe, legal abortions or emergency contraceptives.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 93% of Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k6 grants · $48k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $414k
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Jacob Kalo MD PC dba East Gyn Ctr and Eastland Wmn Ctr (S) | $210,238 |
| Cherry Hill Women's Center | $123,546 |
| Christie Pitney Forward Midwifery (S) | $122,423 |
| Allegheny Reproductive Health Center | $118,962 |
| Philadelphia Women's Center Inc | $108,612 |
| Rachna KaulMaitri Wellness (S) | $102,875 |
| Margaret CarpenterNightingale Medical | $97,496 |
| Columbus Women's Health Organization | $88,790 |
| Robin TuckerMetro Area Advanced Practice Healthcare | $79,044 |
| Razel RemenPills by Post LLC | $73,099 |
| Manisha Kumar dba Ishani Village LLC | $71,632 |
| Delaware County Women's Center | $69,650 |
| Erika BlissEquinox Primary Care PLLC | $53,615 |
| Choix Inc | $50,319 |
| Allentown Women's Center | $36,395 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +105% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
44 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2023, 15 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $236k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMemphis Center For Reproductive Health Inc6× · 2017–2022 · $198k · revenue +24%
- FUFEMHEALTH USA INC6× · 2018–2023 · $120k · revenue +165%
- FWFeminist Womens Health Center Inc6× · 2018–2023 · $102k · revenue +134%
Funded once
- AWAll Women's Healthcare of Columbus Incone grant, 2020 · $75k
- WMWomen's Med Center - Daytonone grant, 2022 · $34k
- WMWomen's Med Group Professional Corporationone grant, 2020 · $31k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission is to enable all marylanders to have access to a wide range of high quality, affordable reproductive health care services. by providing medical services, education, training and advocacy, ppm seeks to help individuals make…
Ppmw provides high-quality, compassionate healthcare, including reproductive care; promote sexual health; and advocate for reproductive rights and health equity for all.
Ppgny is a leading provider of sexual and reproductive health services and information, a fierce advocate, and a committed partner to advance equity and improve health outcomes for all.
The mission of planned parenthood of the columbia willamette (ppcw) is to provide, promote and protect access to quality reproductive and sexual health care in oregon and southwest washington.
Planned Parenthood of Montana empowers all people to make informed decisions and ensures the freedom to manage their own sexuality, and personal health by providing the highest quality confidential healthcare services, education, and…
To provide, promote and protect reproductive and sexual health through health services, education and advocacy.
The mission of planned parenthood of southwest and central florida, inc. is to provide affordable access to comprehensive reproductive healthcare and accurate health information through patient care, education, and advocacy.
Planned parenthood of southern new england provides high-quality health care, education, and advocacy to advance equity and protect the fundamental right to sexual health and reproductive freedom for all.
CHOICES MEDICAL Services provided comprehensive sexual and reproductive healthcare services to over 5,000 patients across 28 states, significantly expanding access to essential reproductive health services.
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health provides comprehensive and complementary health care services in settings that preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of the individual, advocates…
Provide educational and medical treatment options concerning reproductive health related decisions.
Our mission is to provide sexual, reproductive and complementary health services, deliver comprehensive sexuality education, and advocate fiercely for the protection and advancement of health equity and access to care, all with a strong…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Great Plains and the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood Minnesota North Dakota South Dakota. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hopewell Fund · Abortion Care Network · The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc · National Network of Abortion Funds · National Institute for Reproductive Health Inc · Women Donors Network · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Direct Relief · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project?
Find your warmest path to Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.