Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis.

$853k
Granted FY2022
4
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182022.

International$177kHealth$108kCivil Rights$74k
02FY2022 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $62,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $853,354 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $790,854 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST$25,000
UC HASTINGS FOUNDATION$25,000
ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT$6,250
CHURCH WORLD SERVICE$6,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT: $6k → 17%PROMUNDO: $773 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $130k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$63k · 48% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH · GLOBAL CAMPAIGN

South Asia$36k · 28% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: GLOBAL CAMPAIGN

South America$31k · 24% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: SOCIAL INCLUSION

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Association for Unhcr

USA for UNHCR protects and supports refugees by mobilizing resources, elevating awareness, and driving action through a network of engaged supporters.

International
2
Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area

As one of the most enduring civil rights institutions on the West Coast, we work to dismantle systems of oppression and racism, and build an equitable and just society.

3
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
4
Center for Justice and International Law

To contribute to the full enjoyment of human rights in the americas through effective use of the tools of the inter-american system and international human rights law

Crime & Legal
5
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
6
Justice Without Borders

To create transnational access to legal assistance for victims of labour exploitation and human trafficking so that they can seek rightful compensation, even after returning home.

International
7
The Advocates for Human Rights

To promote and protect human rights in the United States and around the world.

International
8
Equality Now Inc

To achieve legal and systematic change that addresses violence and discrimination against women and girls around the world.

International
9
Unitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc

UUSC advances human rights and social justice around the world, partnering with those who confront unjust power structures and mobilizing to challenge oppressive policies. Our work is grounded in the belief that all people have inherent…

International
10
Shift Project Ltd

At Shift, we have one purpose: to transform how business gets done in order to ensure respect for peoples lives and dignity. We believe that the best way to advance our mission is by working directly with Businesses to help shape their…

International
11
Global Witness

Our goal is a more sustainable, just and equal planet. we want forests and biodiversity to thrive, fossil fuels to stay in the ground and corporations to prioritize the interests of people and the planet.

International
12
International Refugee Assistance Project Inc

Irap is a global legal aid and advocacy organization working to create a world where refugees and all people seeking safety are empowered to claim their right to freedom of movement and a path to lasting refuge. everyone should have a safe…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Human Rights First and the most unlike its peers is Church World Service Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Save The Children Federation Inc — $131,986 · InternationalSave The Children Federation IncCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $45,172 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INCHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST — $25,000 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS FIRSTLATIN AMERICA WORKING GROUP EDUCATION FUND — $11,862 · InternationalLATIN AMERICA WORKING GROUP EDUCATION FUND+1 more — $6,250 · InternationalJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $107,612 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYUC LAW SF FOUNDATION — $25,000 · EducationUC LAW SF FOUNDATIONASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT INC — $6,250 · Human ServicesEQUIMUNDO CENTER FOR MASCULINITIES AND SOCIAL JUS — $773 · Human Services
International$220,270Education$132,612Human Services$7,023

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $131,986 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $107,612 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $45,172 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUC LAW SF FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLATIN AMERICA WORKING GROUP EDUCATION FUND — $11,862 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT INC — $6,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC — $6,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUIMUNDO CENTER FOR MASCULINITIES AND SOCIAL JUS — $773 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Women's Refugee Commission Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $130k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph