Skip to content

· Private foundation

Women in Recovery Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.9M
Granted FY2022
13
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$562k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Health$1.2MReligion$735kHuman Services$645kEducation$24kEmployment$17kHousing & Shelter$5kYouth Development$5k
02FY2022 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $99k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $783k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
$54,558
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Womens Step House of Orange County$561,656
Awakening Recovery$462,540
Sisters of St Joseph of Orange$231,270
Orange Catholic Foundation$231,270
First Step House of Orange County Inc$115,635
First Presbyterian Church of Orange$100,000
St Andrew Catholic Church$54,558
St John of God Retirement & Care Center$50,000
Nativity Catholic Church$32,000
Church of the Blessed Sacrament$25,000
Catarinas Club$25,000
Hospitaller Foundation$17,300
Boys and Girls Club of the South Coast$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $588k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Catarinas Club: $25k → 10%Womens Step House of Orange County: $562k → 10%Women's Step House of Orange County: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 5 repeat orgs$973k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +224% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
10

Total granted

$1.7M
$141k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+224%
0%

Still filing today

60%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $832k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    Casa Serena
    2× · 2019–2020 · $578k · revenue +91%
  • WS
    WOMEN'S STEP HOUSE OF ORANGE COUNTY
    4× · 2019–2022 · $565k · revenue +224%
  • AR
    AWAKENING RECOVERY INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $466k · revenue +317%

Funded once

  • BO
    Brother of St John of God Health
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • ST
    St Therese Carmelite School
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • HO
    Hospitaller Order of St John of God
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Olive Tree Sober Living
—
2
California Womens Recovery Inc

Provide lodging, meals & safe haven for women

Health
3
Alano House

To provide a safe and healthy environment for the alcoholic/addict and their families to find recovery and outpatient addiction treatment services

—
4
The Affinity House

Sober living for women

Health
5
Serenity House Inc

Alcoholic rehabilitation program 100-200 residents.

Health
6
Puente House Foundation

The Puente House Foundation provides assitance to men and women who need structured residential living environment in their recovery from substance abuse.

Human Services
7
Beauty for Ashes Women's Home Inc

Drug addiction rehabilitation program

Health
8
Costa House Inc

House recoveryig addicts

Human Services
9
Hope Ridge Recovery Inc

Provide safe haven for recovering women

Health
10
Womens Recovery ServicesA Unique Place

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction for women in a safe residential setting, allowing them and their young children to live together while learning the life skills necessary to become strong, responsible contributors in their…

—
11
First Step Recovery House Inc

To provide shelter for persons recovering from drug or alcohol additions

Health
12
Southern California Alcohol and Drug Programs Inc

Substance abuse prevention, treatment, education, and co-occurring disorders that follow or originate to the same

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women's Step House of Orange County; the most unlike its peers is House of Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Casa Serena: $578,000 · HealthCasa SerenaAWAKENING RECOVERY INC: $466,040 · HealthAWAKENING RECOVERY INCST JOHN OF GOD RETIREMENT AND CARE CENTER: $50,000 · Health+2 more: $12,000 · HealthORANGE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION: $231,270 · OtherORANGE CATHOLIC FOUNDATIONSISTERS OF SAINT JOSEPH OF ORANGE A CORP: $231,270 · OtherSISTERS OF SAINT JOSEPH OF ORANGE A CORPFIRST STEP HOUSE OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $115,635 · OtherFIRST STEP HOUSE OF ORANGE COUNTY INCFirst Presbyterian Church of Orange: $100,000 · OtherFirst Presbyterian Church of OrangeSt Andrew Catholic Church: $64,558 · OtherSt Andrew Catholic ChurchBrother of St John of God Health: $50,000 · Other+12 more: $172,084 · Other+12 moreWOMEN'S STEP HOUSE OF ORANGE COUNTY: $565,056 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S STEP HOUSE OF ORA…CATERINAS CLUB: $25,000 · Human Services
Health$1,106,040Other$964,817Human Services$590,056

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCasa Serena: $578,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetWOMEN'S STEP HOUSE OF ORANGE COUNTY: $565,056 over 4y, 19% of budgetAWAKENING RECOVERY INC: $466,040 over 2y, 19% of budgetFIRST STEP HOUSE OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $115,635 over 1y, 49% of budgetST JOHN OF GOD RETIREMENT AND CARE CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCATERINAS CLUB: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE VILLA CENTER INC: $7,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSOCIAL MODEL RECOVERY SYSTEMS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF HOPE: $5,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SOUTH COAST AREA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Casa Serena ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S STEP HOUSE OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds AWAKENING RECOVERY INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST STEP HOUSE OF ORANGE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN OF GOD RETIREMENT AND CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CATERINAS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds THE VILLA CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL MODEL RECOVERY SYSTEMS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SOUTH COAST AREA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · McMillen Family Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Women in Recovery Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Women in Recovery Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Women in Recovery Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Women in Recovery Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Women in Recovery’s filings →

    More from the funding graph