Skip to content
Woman's Relief Association Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Woman's Relief Association Inc

Support of needy women and children

$48k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$136kHuman Services$119kFood & Nutrition$104kReligion$19kHealth$5k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $44,333, the rows itemized in this filing. The $48,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,667 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$8,083
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SLOW FOOD USA INC$9,583
COCONUT GROVE CARES$8,500
ST ROSE OF LIMA CATHOLIC SCHOOL$8,083
PASS IT ON MINISTRIES$7,000
CHILDREN'S RESOURCE & EDUCATION$6,000
CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER$5,167
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%COCONUT GROVE CARES: $10k → 15%COCONUT GROVE CARES: $10k → 15%COCONUT GROVE CARES: $10k → 15%COCONUT GROVE CARES: $9k → 15%COCONUT GROVE CARES: $8k → 15%COCONUT GROVE CARES: $8k → 15%COCONUT GROVE CARES: $7k → 15%COCONUT GROVE CARES: $7k → 15%MARIAN CENTER SCHOOLS: $9k → 15%PASS IT ON MINISTRIES: $9k → 15%PASS IT ON MINISTRIES: $9k → 15%PASS IT ON MINISTRIES: $8k → 15%PASS IT ON MINISTRIES: $8k → 15%PASS IT ON MINISTRIES: $7k → 15%PASS IT ON MINISTRIES: $7k → 15%PASS IT ON MINISTRIES: $7k → 15%PASS IT ON MINISTRIES: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$355k · 7 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$355k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-14%
+37%

Still filing today

71%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SR
    ST ROSE OF LIMA CATHOLIC PARISH IN MIAMI SHORES INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $73k
  • CG
    COCONUT GROVE CARES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +3%
  • PI
    PASS IT ON MINISTRIES OF SO FL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $61k · revenue -78% · 51% of their budget

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MARY CATHEDRAL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $9k
  • MC
    MARIAN CENTER SCHOOL AND SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $9k · revenue +37%
  • BM
    BREAKTHROUGH MIAMI INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +97%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hearing & Speech Center of Florida Inc

The organization was incorporated in 1937 and reincorporated in 1961 to provide diagnosis and treatment for individuals of all ages with speech, language and hearing disabilities through its centers in South Florida needing speech,…

Health
2
Children's Diagnostic & Treatment Center Inc

To promote the optimal health and wellbeing of children and youth with special health care needs by providing family centered, comprehensive prevention, intervention and treatment services within a medical home environment. our vision is…

Health
3
Sunshine After School Child Care Inc

Sunshine is a not-for-profit child care provider that has been providing superior school-age child care programs in Broward County since 1992.

Human Services
4
United Cerebral Palsy of South Florida Charter Schools Inc

Provide educational and support services to developmentally disabled children and adolescents ages birth to 22 years of age; be a community resource for children and adolescents with developmental disabilities; and provide daycare, after…

Education
5
Centro Mater Child Care Services Inc

Child care services to economically disadvantaged children.

—
6
The Renaissance Learning Center Inc
Education
7
The Florida Center for Early Childhood Inc

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services
8
Coral Reef Montessori Academy Charter School Inc

At Coral Reef Montessori Academy Charter School, we nurture each child through Montessori pedagogy that encourages a lifelong love of learning, builds confidence and independence, and cultivates responsible global citizens.

Education
9
Renaissance Learning Academy Inc
Education
10
Feeding South Florida Inc

Feeding south florida's mission is to end hunger in south florida by providing immediate access to nutritious food, leading hunger and poverty advocacy efforts, and transforming lives through innovative programming and education.

Food & Nutrition
11
Sunrise School of Miami Inc

We operate a pre-k through 8th grade private school using the waldorf school methodology. our educational model embraces the whole child and includes academics, physical education, wellness, music, art, cooking, and agricultural education.

Education
12
Child Guidance Center Inc

The center provides counseling services for the treatment and prevention of behavioral health issues and related problems to children, adolescents, and their families.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals South Florida Inc; the most unlike its peers is Slow Food Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COCONUT GROVE CARES INC: $69,724 · Human ServicesCOCONUT GROVE CARES INCPASS IT ON MINISTRIES OF SO FL: $60,841 · Human ServicesPASS IT ON MINISTRIES OF SO FLMARIAN CENTER SCHOOL AND SERVICES INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesMARIAN CENTER SCHOOL AND SERVICES INCST ROSE OF LIMA CATHOLIC PARISH IN MIAMI SHORES INC: $72,778 · OtherST ROSE OF LIMA CATHOLIC PARI…MIAMI SHORES: $19,496 · OtherMIAMI SHORESST MARY CATHEDRAL SCHOOL: $9,167 · OtherST MARY CATHEDRAL SCHOOLCHILDRENS RESOURCE FUND INC: $48,117 · EducationCHILDRENS RESOURCE FUND INCCHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER INC: $40,675 · EducationCHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENT…BREAKTHROUGH MIAMI INC: $5,625 · EducationBREAKTHROUGH MIAMI INCSLOW FOOD USA INC: $43,577 · Food & NutritionSLOW FOOD US…EASTER SEALS SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $5,200 · Health
Human Services$139,565Other$101,441Education$94,417Food & Nutrition$43,577Health$5,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOCONUT GROVE CARES INC: $69,724 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetPASS IT ON MINISTRIES OF SO FL: $60,841 over 8y, 51% of budgetCHILDRENS RESOURCE FUND INC: $48,117 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetSLOW FOOD USA INC: $43,577 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER INC: $40,675 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetMARIAN CENTER SCHOOL AND SERVICES INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH MIAMI INC: $5,625 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEASTER SEALS SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $5,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COCONUT GROVE CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds PASS IT ON MINISTRIES OF SO FL ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS RESOURCE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SLOW FOOD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MARIAN CENTER SCHOOL AND SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH MIAMI INC ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitabl…The Miami Foundation …The Batchelor Foundat…United Way Miami IncThe Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL17.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Miami Foundation Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · United Way Miami Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Woman's Relief Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Woman's Relief Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Easter Seals South Florida Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Woman's Relief Association Inc?

Find your warmest path to Woman's Relief Association Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Woman's Relief Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home