Loading…
· Public charity
WOMAN'S RELIEF ASSOCIATION INC
Support of need women & children
$48k
Granted FY2024
6
Grants
2
Communities
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0174% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Human Services$140kEducation$94kFood & Nutrition$44kHealth$5kOther$101k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
—
2019
—
2020
—
2021
miamilearning
2022
—
2023
—
2024
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 6 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$8,083
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
- SLOW FOOD USA INC$9,583
- COCONUT GROVE CARES$8,500
- ST ROSE OF LIMA CATHOLIC SCHOOL$8,083
- PASS IT ON MINISTRIES$7,000
- CHILDREN'S RESOURCE & EDUCATION$6,000
- CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER$5,167
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$355k · 7 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else
7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
7
4
Total granted
$355k
$29k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+1%
+29%
Still filing today
71%
75%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
EducationHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CRCHILDREN'S RESOURCES7× · 2017–2024 · $48k · revenue +1%
- SFSLOW FOOD USA INC5× · 2019–2024 · $44k · revenue +35%
- CBCHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER5× · 2018–2024 · $41k · revenue +83%
Funded once
- SMST MARY CATHEDRAL SCHOOLone grant, 2017 · $9k
- MCMARIAN CENTER SCHOOLSone grant, 2018 · $9k · revenue +19%
- BMBREAKTHROUGH MIAMIgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Miami Christian School Inc
Private christian school k-5-12
Education
2
Torah Academy of Boca Raton Inc
Private school encompassing a preschool servicing ages 2-5 as well as elementary school grades 1 -5 and middle school grades 6, 7, and 8. state standard curriculum is followed.
Education
3
Centro Mater Child Care Services
Child care services to economically disadvantaged children.
—
4
Childnet Inc
Childnet is an organization devoted to the development of community-based services and support.
Human Services
5
Florida Keys Childrens Shelter Inc
Provide shelter for children.
Human Services
6
South Florida Autism Center Inc
South Florida Autism Center is committed to serving the entire demographic of individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) residing in South Florida with opportunities that address all their needs on one campus offering early…
Human Services
7
Children's Case Management Organization
Families first of palm beach county's mission is empowering families of all histories and challenges to grow strong in every way. strong empowered families create healthy, resilient homes and communities for generations to come.
Environment
8
Episcopal Children's Services Inc
To create opportunities so children we serve can achieve full potential.
Human Services
9
The Downtown Miami Charter School Inc
A public charter school serving students from kindergarten through sixth grade in miami-dade county.
Education
10
Miami Country Day School Inc
Miami country day school's mission is to educate children from junior kindergarten through 12th grade.
Education
11
Sunshine After School Child Care Inc
Sunshine is a not-for-profit child care provider that has been providing superior school-age child care programs in Broward County since 1992.
Human Services
12
Community Roots Charter School
Children are taught to see the connections between their formal education and the world.
Education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals South Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pass It On Ministries of So Fl. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Human Services$139,565Other$101,441Education$94,417Food & Nutrition$43,577Health$5,200
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL17.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Miami Foundation Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · United Way Miami Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation WOMAN'S RELIEF ASSOCIATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Easter Seals South Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PASS IT ON MINISTRIES.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~100 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 4 filed years.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 650060244 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on PASS IT ON MINISTRIES, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 100 months of cash on hand.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 51% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Woman's Relief Association Inc?
Find your warmest path to Woman's Relief Association Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines