Skip to content
Woman Evolve Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Woman Evolve Inc

The purpose of this corporation is to empower modern women to overcome challenges and limits.

$116k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Youth Development$35kEmployment$30kHuman Services$20kCrime & Legal$15kEducation$15kReligion$10kHealth$10kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $70,100, the rows itemized in this filing. The $115,554 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $45,454 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$230k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TD JAKES FOUNDATION$30,100
HOWARD UNIVERSITY$15,000
GIRLS GOING GLOBAL$15,000
SEVERE SOLUTIONS LLC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%RESTORED HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 14%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MEMPHIS: $10k → 17%DRESS FOR SUCCESS ATLANTA INC: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
NJ
CO
MD
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dahlia Grove

Empower, inspire, encourage and employ women rescued from human trafficking, domestic violence and sexual exploitation as they change their life, regain their independence and enjoy their freedom.

Employment
2
She Is Safe Inc

She Is Safe prevents, rescues and restores women and girls from abuse and exploitation in high risk communities across the globe, equipping them to build lives of freedom and faith for a strong future. We accomplish our work in partnership…

International
3
Girls Hope Rescue Mission

To rescue Kenyan Girls from GBV

Human Services
4
Women Achieving Success
Employment
5
The Bridge 2 Home

The bridge 2 home is a safe and loving home for young girls and young women who were victimized by sex trafficking. at the bridge they can find healing and growth and can experience the love of a perfect heavenly father who pursues them.

Human Services
6
HouseofHopeRefugeofLoveInc

Restoring our youth by turning trauma into triumph for female suvivors of child sex trafficking in Georgia.

Human Services
7
Vision of Hope Ministries Inc

Recognize the worth and sanctity of human life by ministering to young women, children, and families in a christ-centered environment. offer a faith-based residential treatment program for girls age 14-28 struggling with: unplanned…

Health
8
Lighthouse Ministries Inc

Provide a home and care for unwed pregnant girls

Religion
9
Homes of Hope Inc

Homes of Hope is committed to preventing sexual violence. To create a positive future, we empower girls and young women through a comprehensive residential training center. To bring larger change and prevention, Homes of Hope collaborates…

Human Services
10
The Covering House

The covering house is a place of refuge and restoration for girls under the age of 18 who have been sexually exploited or trafficked.

Human Services
11
Lily Haven

At lily haven, our mission is to provide specialized care through a secure home and family-like atmosphere for teen girls who have survived human trafficking.

Health
12
Bloom for Women Inc

To provide sanctuary and a continuum of care to heal, empower, and employ survivors of sex trafficking and exploitation

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alternatives for Girls; the most unlike its peers is The Lullaby House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Young Women's Christian Association of Memphis Tennessee: $10,000 · Human ServicesYoung Women's Christian Associa…WELLSPRINGS VILLAGE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesWELLSPRINGS VILLAGE INCDRESS FOR SUCCESS ATLANTA INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesDRESS FOR SUCCESS ATLANTA INCRestored Hope Ministries Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesRestored Hope Ministries IncA Beautiful Heart Ministries Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesA Beautiful Heart Ministries In…TD JAKES FOUNDATION: $30,100 · EmploymentTD JAKES FOUNDATIONGIRLS GOING GLOBAL: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS GOING GLOBALLADIES OF VIRTUE: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentLADIES OF VIRTUEThe Lullaby House: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe Lullaby HouseMEET HER AT THE GATE: $10,000 · OtherMEET HER AT THE G…POTTERS HOUSE CHURCH OF DENVER INC: $10,000 · OtherPOTTERS HOUSE CHU…MARZ ENTERPRISES: $5,000 · OtherMARZ ENTERPRISES+1 more: $200 · OtherTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · EducationTHE HOWARD UNI…PrettyGirl AcademyLLC: $5,000 · EducationPrettyGirl Aca…CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION: $10,000 · Health
Human Services$45,000Employment$30,100Youth Development$30,000Other$25,200Education$20,000Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTD JAKES FOUNDATION: $30,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGIRLS GOING GLOBAL: $15,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLADIES OF VIRTUE: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetYoung Women's Christian Association of Memphis Tennessee: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWELLSPRINGS VILLAGE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS ATLANTA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetA Beautiful Heart Ministries Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA6.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Woman Evolve Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Woman Evolve Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Woman Evolve Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Woman Evolve Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Woman Evolve’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home