Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Woman Evolve Inc

The purpose of this corporation is to empower modern women to overcome challenges and limits.

$116k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Youth Development$35kEmployment$30kHuman Services$20kCrime & Legal$15kEducation$15kReligion$10kHealth$10kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $70,100 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $115,554 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $45,454 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$230k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TD JAKES FOUNDATION$30,100
HOWARD UNIVERSITY$15,000
GIRLS GOING GLOBAL$15,000
SEVERE SOLUTIONS LLC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%RESTORED HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 14%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MEMPHIS: $10k → 17%DRESS FOR SUCCESS ATLANTA INC: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
NJ
CO
MD
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wings of Refuge

Wings of refuge is a long-term restoration home for female adults who have survived commercial sexual exploitation and/or trafficking. we provide a safe, christ centered atmosphere of healing and restoration for each participant.

Human Services
2
She Is Safe Inc

She Is Safe prevents, rescues and restores women and girls from abuse and exploitation in high risk communities across the globe, equipping them to build lives of freedom and faith for a strong future. We accomplish our work in partnership…

International
3
Girls Hope Rescue Mission

To rescue Kenyan Girls from GBV

Human Services
4
Dahlia Grove

Empower, inspire, encourage and employ women rescued from human trafficking, domestic violence and sexual exploitation as they change their life, regain their independence and enjoy their freedom.

Employment
5
Lighthouse Ministries Inc

Provide a home and care for unwed pregnant girls

Religion
6
The Bridge 2 Home

The bridge 2 home is a safe and loving home for young girls and young women who were victimized by sex trafficking. at the bridge they can find healing and growth and can experience the love of a perfect heavenly father who pursues them.

Human Services
7
HouseofHopeRefugeofLoveInc

Restoring our youth by turning trauma into triumph for female suvivors of child sex trafficking in Georgia.

Human Services
8
Vision of Hope Ministries Inc

Recognize the worth and sanctity of human life by ministering to young women, children, and families in a christ-centered environment. offer a faith-based residential treatment program for girls age 14-28 struggling with: unplanned…

Health
9
Wise Choices for Girls

Wise Choices For Girls has developed upwardly mobile leaders who began as young girls in elementary and middle school and have continued through high school, college and graduate school.

Education
10
Homes of Hope Inc

Homes of Hope is committed to preventing sexual violence. To create a positive future, we empower girls and young women through a comprehensive residential training center. To bring larger change and prevention, Homes of Hope collaborates…

Human Services
11
Sojourn House Inc

Sojourn House exists to defend, restore, and liberate women who have been trafficked or exploited.

Human Services
12
Hope Rising Arizona

Beauty from ashes ranch is faith-based, 501(c) nonprofit organization. it serves girls from 18-24 years old who have suffered from trauma associated with sex trafficking and exploitation, by creating a daily environment of safety and trust…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alternatives for Girls and the most unlike its peers is The Lullaby House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WELLSPRINGS VILLAGE INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesWELLSPRINGS VILLAGE INCDRESS FOR SUCCESS ATLANTA INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesDRESS FOR SUCCESS ATLANTA INCYoung Women's Christian Association of Memphis Tennessee — $10,000 · Human ServicesYoung Women's Christian Associa…Restored Hope Ministries Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesRestored Hope Ministries IncA Beautiful Heart Ministries Inc — $5,000 · Human ServicesA Beautiful Heart Ministries In…TD JAKES FOUNDATION — $30,100 · EmploymentTD JAKES FOUNDATIONGIRLS GOING GLOBAL — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS GOING GLOBALLADIES OF VIRTUE — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentLADIES OF VIRTUEThe Lullaby House — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe Lullaby HouseMEET HER AT THE GATE — $10,000 · OtherMEET HER AT THE G…POTTERS HOUSE CHURCH OF DENVER INC — $10,000 · OtherPOTTERS HOUSE CHU…MARZ ENTERPRISES — $5,000 · OtherMARZ ENTERPRISES+1 more — $200 · OtherTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $15,000 · EducationTHE HOWARD UNI…PrettyGirl AcademyLLC — $5,000 · EducationPrettyGirl Aca…CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION — $10,000 · Health
Human Services$45,000Employment$30,100Youth Development$30,000Other$25,200Education$20,000Health$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTD JAKES FOUNDATION — $30,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGIRLS GOING GLOBAL — $15,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWELLSPRINGS VILLAGE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLADIES OF VIRTUE — $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS ATLANTA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetYoung Women's Christian Association of Memphis Tennessee — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetA Beautiful Heart Ministries Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA6.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Woman Evolve Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Woman Evolve Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Woman Evolve Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph