Skip to content

· Private foundation

Woll-Yellin Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
61
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$600k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$843kReligion$671kInternational$268kHealth$206kHuman Services$76kArts & Culture$45kPhilanthropy$39kCivil Rights$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 61 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k56 grants · $148k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+2 grants · $850k
$2,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ISSAC AGREE DOWNTOWN SYNAGOGUE$600,000
REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$250,000
HEBREW DAY SCHOOL OF ANN ARBOR$100,000
THE TIKVAH FUND$12,500
CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBU$5,400
JEWISH FAMILY SVC OF METRO DETROIT$5,000
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE$5,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ANN ARBOR$5,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS ALYN HOSPITAL$3,600
FRIENDS OF IRGUN NECHI ZAHAL$3,600
JEWISH HOSPICE AND CHAPLAINCY$3,600
STAND WITH US$3,600
COLEL CHABAD$3,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $139k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $3k → 9%MICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $3k → 9%MICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $3k → 9%MICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $3k → 9%MICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $3k → 9%MICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $1k → 9%MICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $1k → 9%COMMUNITY LIVING CENTERS INC: $2k → 8%COMMUNITY LIVING CTRS: $2k → 8%COMMUNITY LIVING CENTERS INC: $2k → 8%COMMUNITY LIVING CTRS: $2k → 8%COMMUNITY LIVING CENTERS INC: $1k → 8%COMMUNITY LIVING CENTERS INC: $1k → 8%COMMUNITY LIVING CENTERS INC: $1k → 8%COMMUNITY LIVING CENTERS INC: $1k → 8%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $3k → 8%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $3k → 8%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $3k → 8%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $3k → 8%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $3k → 8%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $2k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 8%JARC: $25k → 8%JARC: $25k → 8%JARC: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 121 repeat orgs$384k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

121 repeat relationships: 54 still active in FY2025, 67 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

121
49

Total granted

$2.9M
$122k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+3%

Still filing today

40%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $262k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HD
    Hebrew Day School of Ann Arbor
    4× · 2022–2025 · $410k · revenue +56%
  • CF
    Central Fund of Israel
    8× · 2018–2025 · $72k · revenue +145%
  • TT
    THE TIKVAH FUND
    8× · 2018–2025 · $41k · revenue +176%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FAM SVC OF METRO DETROIT
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • AJ
    AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DIST COM
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SVC OF METRO DET
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
3
American Friends of Menuchas Asher Csenger Inc

To promote, benefit, and support jewish educational activities in israel

Religion
4
American Friends of Torah and Tefilah Ramat Eshkol Inc

To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.

Religion
5
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
6
Friends of Ir David Inc

To provide assistance to organizations in the old city of jerusalem and the ancient city of david.

International
7
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
8
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
9
American Friends of Mosdos Montreal Inc

To promote and enhance jewish religious observance in canada

Religion
10
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
11
Jewish Electorate Institute

The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…

Civil Rights
12
American Friends of Rabbinical College Netiv Hadaat Inc

To support, benefit, and assist yeshivat netiv hadaat- jerusalem

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Detroit; the most unlike its peers is The Tikvah Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 180 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/62
Grantees still filing
45/62
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ISAAC AGREE DOWNTOWN SYNAGOGUE: $1,076,600 · OtherISAAC AGREE DOWNTOWN SYNAGOGUEHebrew Day School of Ann Arbor: $410,000 · OtherHebrew Day School of Ann ArborREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $250,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN+132 more: $908,765 · Other+132 moreCentral Fund of Israel: $72,300 · InternationalGRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA: $39,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $31,600 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $28,800 · InternationalNE EMAN FOUNDATION USA: $14,400 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $13,600 · InternationalCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $10,600 · International+8 more: $35,520 · InternationalJARC: $65,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $30,000 · Human ServicesHospice of Michigan Inc: $16,000 · Human ServicesMICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $16,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY LIVING CENTERS INC: $12,200 · Human ServicesTHE TIKVAH FUND: $41,100 · EducationHASBARA FELLOWSHIPS INCORPORATED: $17,800 · EducationJEAN AND SAMUEL FRANKEL JEWISH ACADEMY OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $14,600 · EducationHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT: $14,400 · EducationMENACHEM EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $13,050 · Education+3 more: $9,000 · EducationJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $31,000 · PhilanthropyCaravan to Class: $14,600 · PhilanthropyHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ANN ARBOR: $5,000 · PhilanthropyYaldei Shluchei Harebbe Special Needs Organization: $4,800 · PhilanthropyCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER: $3,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH DENTAL CLINIC: $22,500 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $12,800 · HealthFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $8,800 · HealthKIDS KICKING CANCER INC: $8,000 · HealthBRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF MICHIGAN INC: $6,900 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthGILDA'S CLUB METRO DETROIT: $18,000 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC: $15,100 · Arts & CultureTHE DETROIT JEWISH NEWS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $7,200 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY MUSICAL SOCIETY: $4,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,645,365International$245,820Human Services$139,200Education$109,950Philanthropy$63,400Health$60,000Arts & Culture$54,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHebrew Day School of Ann Arbor: $410,000 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $72,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJARC: $65,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TIKVAH FUND: $41,100 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA: $39,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK: $31,800 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $31,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $31,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $28,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH DENTAL CLINIC: $22,500 over 9y, 6.3% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB METRO DETROIT: $18,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetHASBARA FELLOWSHIPS INCORPORATED: $17,800 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF DVI: $17,500 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetHospice of Michigan Inc: $16,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $16,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC: $15,100 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCaravan to Class: $14,600 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetJEAN AND SAMUEL FRANKEL JEWISH ACADEMY OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $14,600 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT: $14,400 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNE EMAN FOUNDATION USA: $14,400 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $13,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMENACHEM EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $13,050 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $12,800 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY LIVING CENTERS INC: $12,200 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $10,600 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DETROIT JEWISH NEWS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCHABAD AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN INC: $9,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetYAD EZRA: $8,800 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $8,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS KICKING CANCER INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKADIMA: $7,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORR SHALOM INC: $7,200 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $7,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF MICHIGAN INC: $6,900 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $5,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC: $5,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYaldei Shluchei Harebbe Special Needs Organization: $4,800 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetENDOWMENT FOR MIDDLE EAST TRUTH: $4,600 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS WESTERN MICHIGAN: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGush Etzion Foundation % Juliette Landesman: $4,320 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC: $4,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN MIKLAT COMMITTEE: $4,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetLeadership Institute: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSING NETWORK INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY: $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetORT AMERICA INC: $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hebrew Day School of Ann Arbor ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds JARC ↗
  • Who funds THE TIKVAH FUND ↗
  • Who funds GRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH DENTAL CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds GILDA'S CLUB METRO DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds HASBARA FELLOWSHIPS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF DVI ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of Michigan Inc ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Caravan to Class ↗
  • Who funds JEAN AND SAMUEL FRANKEL JEWISH ACADEMY OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds NE EMAN FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds MENACHEM EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Jewish FoundationMI31.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Jewish Foundation · The Bruce H and Rosalie N Rosen Family Foundation · David Kahan Family Foundation · The Andrea and Lawrence Wolfe Family Foundation · Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation Corporation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Shari & Alon Friendship Foundation Inc · Jonathan and Beth Lowe Family Foundation · Mickey Shapiro Charitable Trust · Ben N Teitel Charitable Trust · Marjorie and Maxwell Jospey Foundation · The Irving and Ethel Palman Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Woll-Yellin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Woll-Yellin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 180 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Woll-Yellin Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph